Whose Land Is It? Palestine Or Israel? Exposing the Promises and Betrayals of the Past



In the arid lands where the whispers of ancient prophets still echo through the windswept deserts and time-worn stones, a tumultuous tapestry of conflict has been woven, thread by bloody thread. Welcome to the embattled realms of Israel, a land revered as hallowed ground by billions, yet also a tumultuous theater of ceaseless strife and heart-wrenching warfare. From the gritty struggles of the 1947 to 1949 Palestine war, ensnaring figures like David Ben-Gurion and King Abdullah I, to the formidable shadows cast by the titans of conflict such as Gamal Abdel Nasser during the fraught days of the Six-Day War in 1967.

Can you hear the cannons roar across the Sinai Peninsula? Can you feel the shifting sands under the weight of armored divisions clashing in the sweltering heat? “In Israel, in order to be a realist, you must believe in miracles,” said David Ben-Gurion. A saying that ripples through the tumultuous tides of Israel’s conflicted history, mirroring the incessant quest for peace amid a symphony of swords and sorrows.

Absorbing the powerful words of Mahatma Gandhi: “An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind.” How do these echoes of non-violence ripple through the tumultuous oceans of historical clashes and contentions?

Join us, as we traverse the chronicles of Israel’s battle-scarred past, navigating through the haze of warfare and the echoes of tumultuous conflicts, to unveil the human stories shrouded beneath the shadows of swords and the tempests of history. Welcome to the diary of Julius Caesar.

The Echoes of Balfour. The Legacy of a Century-Old Promise in Modern Conflicts.

In the crucible of World War I, a potent proclamation emerged that would resonate through the corridors of history, leaving an indelible imprint on the tapestry of Middle Eastern geopolitics—the Balfour Declaration. Crafted on November 2, 1917, by Arthur James Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary, this cryptic yet momentous document articulated the British government’s support for establishing a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine. The historical theatre was set against the backdrop of the Ottoman Empire’s declining prowess, and the strategic calculus of British imperial interests, intertwining the threads of diplomacy, war, and Zionist aspirations.

Navigating through the complexities of the declaration reveals a convergence of motivations. Britain, engaged in the labyrinth of global conflict, sought to secure wartime alliances and post-war spheres of influence, leveraging the declaration as a strategic chess piece. In this geopolitical chessboard, prominent personalities were instrumental. Chaim Weizmann, a notable Zionist leader and chemist, cultivated significant influence within British political echelons, contributing a nuanced dynamism to the evolution of the declaration.

Numbers and statistics unveil the demographical transformation that Palestine underwent. In the embryonic stages of the Balfour Declaration in 1917, Jewish inhabitants constituted about 10% of Palestine’s population. Fast-forwarding through the corridors of time, by the onset of World War II, Jewish inhabitants had burgeoned to approximately 30%, reflecting the tangible impacts of the migration currents facilitated by the declaration.

An intricate mosaic of international agreements and promises characterized this epoch. The Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916, a secret arrangement between Britain and France, carved spheres of influence in the Middle East, sowing the seeds of conflicting promises with the Arab custodians of the lands. These interwoven pledges cultivated an environment ripe for future contentions and contestations.

00:00 A Brief History
1:45 The Echoes of Balfour
5:11 Chronicles of Independence and Nakba 1947-1949
9:10 The Unfolding Tapestry of the 1956 Suez Crisis
12:55 The Reshaping of the Middle East in the Six-Day War of 1967
16:33 Chronicles of the War of Attrition 1967-1970
20:12 Unpacking the Yom Kippur War’s Echoes of Surprise and Struggle
23:48 A Symphony of Valor in Uganda’s Theater
27:15 Lebanon 1982
30:47 Unveiling the First Intifada
34:46 The Odyssey of the Oslo Accords
38:28 Unraveling the Second Intifada
41:37 The Canvas of Conflict and Change in Lebanon
45:15 Navigating Peaceful Avenues in the Israeli-Palestinian Tapestry

source

17 thoughts on “Whose Land Is It? Palestine Or Israel? Exposing the Promises and Betrayals of the Past”

  1. Israel is the two state solution. Israel allows both to live in harmony, while jews are forced out of every Arab nation.

    This is purely an Arab hatred issue nothing more.

    The entire cognitive identity of the Palestinian is hatred of jews and Israel, we need to quit play like they're not fascist ideological morons.

    Reply
  2. The Holly land – they put holes in each other's children – disgusting. Israel is entitled to the southern side only when you go back over 2,000 years from what I've read. Babies and 3/4 year old children are not Hamas. I'm in Australia and most Australians believe Israel has over stepped the mark to say the least.. Images of the dead and wounded children aren't doing Netenayuh and Israel any favours for their image. Cant you lot over there just go to the football, or something like normal people ?

    Reply
  3. There's something wrong with the people in the Northern Hemisphere that they have to all have guns,weapons, rockets, missiles. Maybe Australia can send them 50,000 kangaroos so they got something else to kill besides each other's children. Can't they find a hobby or play sport or go fishing or do something positive and constructive?

    Reply
  4. The Holly land because they put holes in each other's children- disgusting. I'm in Australia and most Australians think Israel has way over stepped the mark to say the least. Images of of deceased,maimed and wounded Infants and children are not showing Netenayuh and Israel in a good light at all to put it nicely.

    Reply
  5. Should've gone further back in history. Back when God our Creator promised the land of Canaan now Israel to the Jews. It was only because of a Roman emperor Hadrian that the word Palestine came about as an insult to the Hebrews. Long before there ever was "Palestine", Israel was already established by God Himself. The trouble comes when people ignore this fact and focus on recent history. Even then, the Jews aquired their land legally by purchasing them off from the Arabs who willingly sold the arid desert to the Jews. Now that it's prosperous because of God's blessings and the hardwork of the Jews, the arabs want to claim it back by saying it's "occupied" territory. How just is that?

    Reply
  6. A history of the 'PALESTINIAN STATE':

    1. Before Israel, there was a British mandate, not a Palestinian state

    2. Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state.

    3. Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state.

    4. Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid Arab-Kurdish Empire, not a Palestinian state.

    5. Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Frankish and Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state.

    6. Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there was the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state.

    7. Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state.

    8. Before the Byzantine Empire, there were the Sassanids, not a Palestinian state.

    9. Before the Sassanid Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state.

    10. Before the Byzantine Empire, there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state.

    11. Before the Roman Empire, there was the Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state.

    12. Before the Hasmonean state, there was the Seleucid, not a Palestinian state.

    13. Before the Seleucid empire, there was the empire of Alexander the Great, not a Palestinian state.

    14. Before the empire of Alexander the Great, there was the Persian empire, not a Palestinian state.

    15. Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state.

    16. Before the Babylonian Empire, there were the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, not a Palestinian state.

    17. Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state.

    18. Before the kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state.

    19. Before the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, there was an agglomeration of independent Canaanite city-kingdoms, not a Palestinian state.

    20. Actually, in this piece of land there has been everything, EXCEPT A PALESTINIAN STATE.

    courtesy of If9341

    Reply
  7. I say it belongs to the Jews, it's the birthplace of the Jewish people. Here their spiritual, religious and national identity was formed.
    Here they achieved independence and created a culture of national and universal significance.

    What would the muslims do if Mekka, Saoedi-Arabië was invaded by another religious groep?

    Jerusalem, Israel is for the Jews as what Mekka, Saoedi-Arabië is for Muslims, a holy place and heritage of their religious faith!!!

    So when you ask who should rule Israel, I say with 100% confidence, it should be the Jews!!!

    Muslims already have a place in this world, they have multiple counties..
    Let the jews have their place in this world as well!!!

    Reply

Leave a Comment