What Happened to The Eastern Bloc After Soviet Collapse? | Animated History



Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC, Android and iOS:
💥 https://con.onelink.me/kZW6/TheArmchairHistorian
Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days!

Sign up for Armchair History TV today! https://armchairhistory.tv/
Promo code: ARMCHAIRHISTORY for 50% OFF
Merchandise available at https://store.armchairhistory.tv/

Check out the new Armchair History TV Mobile App too!
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/armchair-history-tv/id1514643375
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=tv.uscreen.armchairhistorytv

Discord: https://discord.gg/zY5jzKp
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ArmchairHist

Sources:
Armour, Ian D. A History of Eastern Europe 1918 to the Present: Modernisation, Ideology and Nationality. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021.
“Belarus Protests One Year on: Lukashenko in Command and Striking Back” Translated by John Shelton, Deutsche Welle, 8 Aug. 2021, https://www.dw.com/en/belarus-protests-one-year-on-lukashenko-in-command-and-striking-back/a-58793285.
Bideleux, Robert and Ian Jeffries. A History of Eastern Europe: Crisis and Change, Edition 2. London: Routledge, 2020.

Kandelaki, Giorgi. “Georgia’s Rose Revolution: A Participant’s Perspective.” United States Institute of Peace, 2006. https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/sr167.pdf.

Medvedev, Roy A. Post-Soviet Russia: A Journey Through the Yeltsin Era. Trans. and ed. George Shriver. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.

NATO’s Return to Europe: Engaging Ukraine, Russia, and Beyond. Ed. Rebecca R. Moore and Damon Coletta. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2017.

Pynnöniemi, Katri; Rácz, András, eds. Fog of Falsehood: Russian Strategy of Deception and the Conflict in Ukraine. FIIA Report, 45. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs, 2016.
“Relations with Russia.” NATO, 9 Mar. 2022, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_50090.htm#:~:text=NATO%2DRussia%20relations%20started%20after,Atlantic%20Cooperation%20Council%20(1991).
“Russia Invades Ukraine.” Reuters, https://graphics.reuters.com/UKRAINE-CRISIS/zdpxokdxzvx/.
Thompson, John M. and Christopher J. Ward. Russia: A Historical Introduction from Kievan Rus’ to the Present, Edition 8. London: Routledge, 2018.

Zimmerman, William. Ruling Russia: Authoritarianism from the Revolution to Putin. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.

Music:
Armchair Historian Theme – Zach Heyde
Blind Trust – Heath Cantu
Swan Lake Dance of the Little Swans Act II – Tchaikovsky
Swan Lake Dance of the Little Swans Act IV – Tchaikovsky
Swan Lake Waltz – Tchaikovsky
Dismantle – Peter Sandberg
Mistress Tears – Jon Bjork
In Obscurity Lies the Gate – Christoffer Moe Ditlevsen

source

47 thoughts on “What Happened to The Eastern Bloc After Soviet Collapse? | Animated History”

  1. Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC, Android and iOS:

    💥 https://con.onelink.me/kZW6/TheArmchairHistorian

    Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days!

    Sign up for Armchair History TV today! https://armchairhistory.tv/

    Promo code: ARMCHAIRHISTORY for 50% OFF

    Merchandise available at https://store.armchairhistory.tv/

    Check out the new Armchair History TV Mobile App too!

    https://apps.apple.com/us/app/armchair-history-tv/id1514643375

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=tv.uscreen.armchairhistorytv

    Discord: https://discord.gg/zY5jzKp

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/ArmchairHist

    Reply
  2. Pillage by the West, hand in hand with Russian capitalist oligarchs who apparently hid their stolen wealth from the revolution, or accrued it due to corruption in the latter years.

    Reply
  3. Yanukovich wasn't perfect but he was trying to perform a balancing act between East and West. Also, when talking about the revolution of dignity you fail to mention the numerous nazi militias involved in the protests. Your anti-Russian bias is palpable

    Reply
  4. The video missed the point. Ukraine alienated it's own Russian speaking 🗣️ population by banning the use of Russian language. Therewith starting a civil war since the year 2014 up to this day evolving to the proxy war with all world powers involved and supplying with arms. The world citizens in this world are carrying the brunt and pain of this ongoing conflict in their lifelyhoods

    Reply
  5. In regards to what you said at 12:45 "even the most hardcore german socialists knew that the writing was on the wall (downfall of the gdr)":
    I really dislike this framing as it paints the whole social upheaval as an anti-socialist opposition against the socialist supported east german government. This is simply not what happened – a lot of the most influential social movements that started the big demonstrations in the gdr in 1989 where explicitly socialist. They wanted more democracy, more transparacy and more liberties and general, but they also mostly argued for a socialist system of some kind (and I mean socialist not social democratic. This oppinion also was reflected in the broader parts of society (although not as strongly). Why then did no reformed socialist system emerge in the gdr? Well simple answer: people wanted reunification above all, so this issue pushed everything else to the side. And Kohl, the chancellor of west germany, only allowed reunification on their terms (famously saying "no experiments allowed"). With this reunification as we had in otl was the only realistic outcome, even though during 1989 the year of all the social upheaval and the blooming of east german civil society socialist policies and a federational system with high autonomy in east germany was equally if not even more popular.

    To sum it up, a lot of people didn't want to get a rid of socialism, they wanted to get rid of the authoritarian gdr and their oppression. And this difference needs to be highlighted as it even helps to understand contemporary german politics.

    This lack of understanding is also apparent in regards to solidarnosc in poland. This labor union movement also had strong socialist tendencies. In many east european republics socialists had a key position in ending authoritarian rule. Today people just kind of forget that – well history is written by the victors and in the end no socialist reformations where sucessfull.

    Reply
  6. "Economic, sirvuving only by leeching resorses from their client state"? Seriously? What kind of resorses? Because i know that USSR supplied their "client states" with everything he could in exchange for loyalty. Moscow sent grain and oil to Warsaw pact members, funded comm parties all over the world. And after oil prices plummeted in late 80s, those gifts were denied. This was one of the reasons why uneffective and opressive communistic regimes were toppled shortly after. Please, enlighten me where i'm wrong.

    Reply
  7. Great video mate but to say that “the shattered remnants of the JNA couldn’t resist NATO” is absolutely incorrect. The Yugoslav Army defended Yugoslavia’s borders during the whole 78 NATO illegal bombing campaign and is the only army in the world to have scored a direct kill of a so called “stealth” aircraft. They were not beaten militarily but diplomatically and had to withdraw. They did themselves and their country proud.

    Reply
  8. I am Ukrainian, but I live in Russia
    , it seems to me that you are misinterpreting the history of Ukraine.
    1 the Budapest memorandum has not been ratified
    2 there was a coup d'etat in 2014
    3 Viktor Fedorovich Yanukovych was not pro-Russian
    . Because he acted with his own interests and if he signed the association, his country became not competitive, that is, the economy fell and so on

    Reply
  9. Come-on historian. Ceausescu was Washington's darling. That is until he decided to get away from IMF
    "Mr. Nixon went out of his way to publicize President Ceausescu's two‐day stay in Washington even though he had already been entertained at the White House on Saturday at a dinner for 31 chiefs of state and government who were in the United States for the 25th anniversary of the United Nations. Mr. Ceausescu was the only Communist head of state to attend the celebrations, and the Nixon Administration, pleased with Rumania's independent foreign policies in the Communist world, displayed warm friendship for him."

    Reply
  10. This is simply not true that Yanukovich was pro-Russian. His government made calculations and EU deal was bad. Russia was giving $15 billion with no constrains. EU demanded killing of entire industries.
    And no – massive protests were not result of Yanukovich not signing agreement. These protests were organized by the west. Yanukovich's actions were used as pretense.

    Reply
  11. Thanks to Putin???? Before anything started in Donbass, ethnic Ukrainian nationalists took over 13 regional governments and several SBU buildings and a few military installations. This is regime installed in Kiev attacked Donabass. And Russia came to defend it.

    Reply
  12. So you had that bald, goateed maniac, followed by the severely paranoid, emotionally maladjusted man of steel…..a maniac, then a gang of successively older, greedier and more f@cked up…..maniacs (🙍)

    Then finally a therapist.

    Then released into the waiting arms of a rapacious drunk and finally being rescued by a Phantom Menace, a reeaaaal bastard.

    And maniac of maniacs.

    Reply
  13. Communism was so bad that in the Soviet Union, that in the 1996 elections in Russia, the US and Germany had to throw a truck load of money on the campaign of Boris Yeltsin, so the communists would not come back to power through elections. Even then, the communist party came in second.
    That was just 4 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of communism in Russia. Communism was so bad, that, half of the Russians wanted the communists back in power and voted for them.
    A similar thing happened in Poland , except that in Poland, the communists actually won the elections, and communism was so bad in Poland, that the Poles voted for Aleksander Kwasniewsky, the former communist Minister of Youth, defeating Lech Walesa and the Solidarity party. Even thinking that Mr. Walesa had a lot of cash from the western countries, still he lost to the communists.
    Same thing in Bulgaria in 1994, where the Communists claimed a Parliament Election Victory and Zhan Videnov, a 35-year-old former Communist official became the Prime Minister.
    And the same thing happened in other former communist countries like Lithuania in 1992, and Hungary in 1994. Why people that lived so many years under communism vote for communists? Because in the end it wasn't that bad.

    Reply
  14. Ukraine is one hell of a hotbed now! That said, it's looking more and more like one that will remain un-occupied when all is said and done. Hell, they might well even reclaim Crimea at this point. Do you foresee a "military buffer state" if that happens? It really does depend on two things. What Russia "itself" does with Putin afterwards, and who/what replaces him.

    Reply
  15. Бред какой-то, население всех стран Восточной Европы, в том числе и СССР, были против ухода коммунистов, бунты и забастовки продолжались вплоть до 1993 года

    Reply
  16. In your opening words on Gorbachev you use "unfortunately" in connection with "fall of the Soviet Union". And I have just watched your video on Chechnya, in which the Russian apartment bombings are unambiguously attributed to Chechen terrorists (despite consensus that they were a Russian operation). Is this a serious channel?

    Reply
  17. Dane here. I remember most of this. I saw it on the TV in the news. One of my teachers (from Schlelswig) went to Berlin to gather up a piece of the Berlin wall. The piece went around in the classroom. It was so massive a moment, we realized we where holding a piece of history in our hands.

    The image of the bloodied form of Ceaușescu and his wife were etched in my memory, and that period of events in Eastern Europe was formative of my understanding of history and it sparked my interest in politics and foreign affairs. I'm so glad I was alive to witness this – on the sidelines. I don't envy those that was in the middle of this, but I'm glad that there were enough people that changed the course of the countries of Eastern Europe.

    Reply

Leave a Comment