Solving the mystery of America's "Aurora" spy plane



Rumors of a classified aircraft commonly known as “Aurora” have spanned the decades… but is it really possible that the United States was operating a fleet of hypersonic aircraft in the 1980s and 90s?

This is Part 2 of our dive into Aurora. In Part One, we covered the evidence and witness reports of Aurora in America’s Southwest and over the UK. In this episode, we dive into the money to clear up some longstanding misconceptions about this program. And finally, we draw some logical conclusions about the truth behind Aurora.

Check out Part 1 here: https://youtu.be/J_r31ibMshA

Check out the incredible work of Rodrigo Avella on his website! https://rodrigoavella.com/
Or follow him on Instagram here: https://www.instagram.com/rodrigo.avella

📱 Follow Sandboxx News on social
Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandboxxnews
Instagram: https://instagram.com/sandboxxnews
Facebook: https://facebook.com/sandboxxnews
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@sandboxxnews

📱 Follow Alex Hollings on social
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AlexHollings52
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/alexhollingswrites
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AlexHollingsWrites
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@alexhollings52

Further Reading
Original Article: https://www.sandboxx.us/blog/was-americas-aurora-hypersonic-aircraft-real-we-get-to-the-bottom-of-it/
Classified aircraft programs ongoing: https://www.sandboxx.us/blog/5-secretive-new-warplanes-the-us-is-developing-for-the-next-big-fight/
Boeing Bird of Prey: https://www.sandboxx.us/blog/bird-of-prey-boeings-lost-stealth-fighter-once-prowled-over-area-51/
Darkstar and the SR-72: https://www.sandboxx.us/blog/is-there-a-real-secret-aircraft-behind-lockheed-and-top-guns-darkstar/

Citations:
Bill Sweetman for WaPo: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1992/12/13/mystery-plane/0ab6ba1e-907b-4838-8516-0c38241f04a3/
PDE and RDE engines: https://www.sandboxx.us/blog/darpas-new-missile-hints-at-truly-game-changing-technology/
Aurora Timeline: https://web.archive.org/web/20080725014630/http://www.aemann.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/aircraft/black/aurora/aurora5.htm
LA Times Aurora coverage in 1985: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1985-02-09-fi-4198-story.html
Sun Sentinel in 1985: https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/fl-xpm-1985-02-09-8501050040-story.html
Ben Rich book: https://www.amazon.com/Skunk-Works-Personal-Memoir-Lockheed/dp/0316743003
FY 1987 Budget: https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/senate-bill/2638
B-2 1995 Report: https://www.gao.gov/assets/nsiad-95-164.pdf

source

35 thoughts on “Solving the mystery of America's "Aurora" spy plane”

  1. I live in Northwest Indiana and back in the early 2000's I was awoken late at night by a VERY loud sounding jet and the ground actually shaking like a small earthquake! I ran outside and could see a very large contrail in the night sky…

    Reply
  2. I choose to believe they already have Aurora and the money they're dumping into these current projects are for a next-next generation craft that will be the equivalent of the Star Trek Enterprise. With warp engines, transporters, and hair accessories turned into visors for the seeing impaired.

    Reply
  3. If “Aurora” was for stealth development and the B-2 was already well past development; perhaps it was early funding for the YF-22/23 proposals that were in competition in the late 80s and early 90s?

    Reply
  4. I have always seen there is a problem with mach 5+ aircraft that being surface heat at high speed. the other issue is stealth coating and heat.
    Yes, there may have been a prototype 'aurora' aircraft but only to test aircraft flight and only at lower mach 3 plus speeds with experimental stealth coating.
    When the stealth coatings failed, the project was mothballed until better coatings are found.
    I believe there is one test aircraft, and it's stored and rarely used for testing.
    Something is using JP7 fuel

    Reply
  5. My grandpa worked on the f117 / B2 but wouldn't talk about his work except to say they were 20-50 years ahead of what we knew publicly. Those planes were subsonic radar absorbing bombers with traditional ceilings. Aurora would take suntan and oxcart to the next level, hyper sonic and operating in the ionosphere where the sound and radar returns would be non existent, also where the aurora is btw. Likely using hydrogen fuel but not in a scramjet. Supposedly the f19 design mirrors 3 aircraft built, 2 of them crashed. Also there is a readiness stipend, black budget and "2 trillion is missing" budget.

    Reply
  6. I often wonder over this type of story if the US military “leaks” certain info just to panic Russia and/or China into spending tons of money on some unobtanium. It seems as though they both try to do the same to us. We know that the Air Force was more than happy to let people believe that the all of the prototype testing at Grooms Lake were UFOs.

    Reply
  7. When you said said “why is the government spending money to fund the development of hypersonic engines in the current time if they supposedly already had one?” That line hit hard. Boom it all makes sense. For me that line is the one thing I’ll need to confidently say “the hypersonic aurora aircraft is a myth”

    Reply
  8. I'll poke a few holes in the story see if anyone thinks it's right or wrong, Government spending is subject to oversight, and has to be reported and somewhat disclosed to the taxpayer, government contracts to private companies are not as open. What government report and what they spend are not always the same, are you saying after Blackbird and B2, Nighthawk they just gave up and left any further development, I would say the X-37 was a result of the space shuttle and X-40A, so they made the Blackbird and just dropped spanners and left everything, I don't think so.

    These people who say we have stuff which would not look out of place in Star Trek are they plugging a book full of stories or is there some element of truth, they have been developing laser technology for what seems like forever, we still don't have a pulse rifle in the 40 watt range.
    I have worked on military sites and for the government and they spend money like it's going out of fashion, got to spend this money before the new budget starts, rightly in some cases replacing equipment which needs to be replaced, not so in every case, we have sites in every country all the details of what goes on and how much it costs is not always clear.

    Reply
  9. I have seen it fly. I was at Ft. Irwin in 1993 during a time when radar picked up a plane going hypersonic out of Edwards. It was dropped by a B-52. When the planes separated, the smoke from the B-52 was quite different than the string of white puffs that came out of the other craft. I had some very strong binoculars that helped see the dark arrow shape.

    Reply
  10. Excellent research !! Well done. Another facet is that the rumors and 'sighting' can serve as disinformation easily picked-up by the soviets (at that time) without the CIA doing anything !! Hey, let's just let chatter in the private sector do the work for us !!

    Reply
  11. there was a famous composite image from a satellite of a plumed type of exhaust trail from nevada to china (the long, east) which resembles what you'd expect a pulse detonation wave engine. no idea if aurora worked but it was a project

    Reply
  12. Thanks for the video(s). Aurora is a really interesting topic, but your final conclusion is the same that I'd come to a long time ago.

    Something I'd really appreciate you doing a deep dive into is a craft that has also had the Aurora moniker attached to it. I'm talking about the infamous TR3-B. Personally, I really believe this exists. What pushed me over to the believer side was an unexpected source that had firsthand knowledge of it. All I got when I asked if it existed was a, "Yes".

    There are loads of videos and websites that talk about it as a real craft that has been flown (?), used for reconnaissance and even taken part in the first Gulf War.

    None of these online sources are such that I trust what they say to be true. But some of the more believable ones have now claimed that the Air force has acknowledged it.

    I think you mentioned it in this 2-parter, but I'd love to see what you can find on this unicorn of a plane.

    Reply
  13. i recommend ben rich's book ALL the time. "skunk works", available everywhere and on audiobook. no promo code, no affiliate link. just love aviation and i loved that book. and while you're here, might as well check out field of fight, lieutenant michael tyrone flynn's book. he knows way more than people give him credit for.

    Reply
  14. I'm not sure why people expected a fleet of mass produced aircraft when just a few would suffice, hide their existence from other counties, plausible deniability and be fast enough to reach their target in reasonable time.

    Not to mention that we're hearing that hypersonics have been around long enough to be a "very mature technology".
    While we're only NOW reaching the disclosure through public variants like the the SR-72/SR-91.

    Reply
  15. I have now watched both of your videos, there is so little facts here you really could have stopped at one vid. There are good photographs of triangular aircraft that you did not include here and should have. Basically if something can be photographed in flight then it exists.

    Reply
  16. Alex you sound like me in the 60s when I was a DJ at five radio stations. Have fun with it. I think with the X-37 doing well there was no need for Aurora. The plane is to link up with the ISS space station soon.

    Reply

Leave a Comment