Shocking Results! Shades VS Washes… Games Workshop At War With The Army Painter! Clear Winner



War Hammer Man Studios for the Ultimate Experiment, Putting Games Workshop Shades VS The Army Painter Washes…

Welcome back, today we will be showing off a couple completed bases, in a very important comparison. We have two sets of custom made, nearly identical bases. painted exactly the same way, right up until its time to apply the wash/shade. The results are shocking. Specific points of Comparison:

Final Result Quality
Ease of Application
Size of Bottle
Price Comparison
FInal Results

let me know what you think in the comments, or if you have any additional questions, please feel free to ask.

Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and share, for daily content.

Paints used:
Brown Primer Spray
Khaki Primer Spray
Rakarth Flesh drybrush
Corax White Drybrush
Retributor Armour (spent casings & details)

Either:
Agrax Earthshade or Strong Tone

white scar (skulls)
Abaddon Black Base Rim

Bases Used:
Shattered temple terrain (hole saw drill)
terrain bits (ruins, statues, sand, cork)
sand/rubble
skulls

source

33 thoughts on “Shocking Results! Shades VS Washes… Games Workshop At War With The Army Painter! Clear Winner”

  1. Would like to add that TAP also has a Quickshade Paint Set. Contains all of their Washes for ~$35. Obviously this means less for people that have their favorite 2-3 washes, but allows for some experimentation with colors you might not usually pick out.

    Reply
  2. This was good content bud. I like army painters range my only complaint is with the base paints. Those are thick and require a damn good shake. I'd be interested to know your thoughts on speed paint vs contrast.

    Reply
  3. The large cans of Quick shade dip are not the same product as the Army Painter washes. The large cans are more like a wood stain. You have to thin and clean up with turpentine. The large cans are not as quick as they advertise because they take a day or two to fully dry. They also smell really bad and will stink up your house. I had to leave my models outside for a week for the smell to fade away. Sometimes cheaper is not always better.

    Reply
  4. I'd curious if you have noticed much of a difrences between the new GW washes and old GW washes as in addition to being a smaller bottle thay are a slightly difrent mixture too (I belive thay are now using contrast medium instead of the old mix)

    Reply
  5. One of the gripes I have with GW bottles is the poor labeling. The colors on the bottles are as bad as their dice colors. I find I have to get out of my chair to read labels on the shelf. That is a function of failing eyesight but I can read Reaper and Vallejo bottles easily.

    Reply
  6. Great vid, man; totaly agree with you on droppers for paints but open bottles for shades ´n contrasts (I use Army Painters shades though, prices differences), got to try GWs Contrasts vs APs Speedpaints.

    Reply
  7. If you add a little water and a little flow improver or thinner to the strong tone, it gets really close to Agrax. So, you might even be reasonable in calling Strong Tone "concentrated" which increases the value even more.

    Reply
  8. Finally someone who feel exactly as I do about the bottle's. 100% have been converting all my paint to vallejo as I like the paint and bottles better then GW and I continue to buy only GW contrast and wash as the product is good (even tho more expensive) but mainly because I love the GW bottles for washes and Contrast.

    Reply
  9. Great vid. It’s hard to see in the video, I say from the samples. The right looks a little darker. But I like it! Will definitely give it a shot.
    I tried the army primers. Or a bunch of primers. And GW won my heart. All the other (for me) seem to cake up too much detail. And I flipped back to the GW. If I try anything else to prime, I’m just going to try an airbrush.
    Oh and I totally agree about shaders in pots. I love working off the tongue in the lid. Never has to leave the pot unless I want it to leave

    Reply
  10. i am with you on the gw pots for washes …… i dont like their paints , though i do keep a few of the old empties for washes to go in….. i still keep some washes in the droppers because they are better for the airbrush.

    Reply
  11. I do love GW paints. I have tired others and they just come up lite one way or another. I think I am also used to the sheen of GW paints.

    That being said though, the prices are crazy on all of their products. I really have lost interest in keeping up too. I will buy the 40k 10th edition starter as I have all the others, but that will be the last 'new' game/model that I will buy. I am just going to fill in my collection of older armies and games. Not that those don't come with a premium too, but there is something reasonable about paying that for an OOP item versus one currently produced.

    What is worse is that GW doesn't really make games with longevity anymore. Its like they are designed to bore the consumer quickly, unlike their older games, which I still get a lot of mileage from. I just played Warhammer Quest (1995 version) a couple of weekends ago. There is enough in that old set to last a lifetime. I don't feel the same with their newer stuff.

    Reply
  12. I'm surprised you don't use more paints from other companies. You are missing out honestly 🙂 Both for value and just variety and special uses.

    But I can always understand why people like to stick to the citadel paint ecosystem so to speak. The thing is certain paint lines are superior to citadel. Acryl pro is my go to now for most basing/layering, I highly recommend you try it, I think you'd love it.

    Anyway, as far as the washes go: I've used both lines of washes for a long time now and overall I do think army painter is superior. However, Agrax and Nul'n are extremely good and as you showed it's hard to say which produces better results for these (black and brown) – I still use agrax and nul'n often. Though that's usually if I mix in some of the gloss versions for metallic armour (which is gone now, sadly).

    The thing with army painter that you might be missing so far is that the colored washes are far superior to the equivalent colored washes from citadel (not sure on the new formulations though).

    The other thing, and maybe the best part: army painter sells the wash medium on its own. This is potentially a super valuable tool in your repertoire! You can dilute the washes which is so nice at times, being able to do a mild wash and then go over some darker areas with another pass – or mix colors, or other things, I love that medium (can be used with citadel washes just fine too).

    I do agree this is one of the only times I think the pot is better than a dropper – as long as you have something to place it in to avoid knocking it over by accident…

    Reply
  13. Honestly I'm glad I have a few pots of the old shade. Gives me time to learn some new shadowing techniques with my painting. When I saw they were revamping their shade line I was super dismayed. I knew some sheisty shit might pop up

    Reply
  14. This is my favorite type of review. It can be objective becauae you're not shilling a product. That is you paid for both of the product.

    When a company provides the review product gratis the results are always skewed.

    Always.

    Thanks for the review, and for reminding us that there are other paint lines than Citadel/Games Workshop.

    Reply

Leave a Comment