Real Reason MONSTER WAVES Can't Sink LARGEST Aircraft Carriers



🚢 Dive into the tumultuous world of naval operations and discover how nature’s forces shape their destiny! 🌊 From ancient storms to modern disasters, explore the impact of weather on military campaigns at sea. Witness the resilience of the US Navy against Mother Nature’s fury, from historical losses to cutting-edge defenses. 🛳️ Discover the advanced technologies, including satellite imagery and fin stabilizers, that protect ships and sailors today. 🌐 Join us on this thrilling journey and share your thoughts on naval engineering in the comments below! ⚓ Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and stay tuned for more military insights! 🎥🔍 #NavalOperations #USNavy #MilitaryTech #WeatherDefense

#themilitaryshow

source

27 thoughts on “Real Reason MONSTER WAVES Can't Sink LARGEST Aircraft Carriers”

  1. Having ballasts, gyros, fins and other aids for keeping the ship stabilized is well tested and improves stability overall. However all these systems may be loosing to the force of nature if you get into a situation where the ship itself works as a sail against strong winds, you cannot control the direction of the ship, and if a freakwave hits your broadside not so funny stuff could happen.

    Reply
  2. They are a bubble basically when they close it up. Also, the weigh of carriers vs like a battleship, the weight of big guns and many of them, plus the turret weight and other high structure, and the fact they made the battleships low profile to be smaller targets, means a lot of weight is pretty high up on the ship compared to carriers.
    I'm not a ship builder so I could be wrong but that would be my answer at hand.

    Reply
  3. Essentially, when carriers seal themselves off, they create a bubble.

    Additionally, the weight distribution between carriers and battleships is quite different.

    Battleships typically carry heavy guns, numerous turrets, and other high structures, often positioned lower to maintain a smaller profile and reduce vulnerability.

    This means that a significant portion of the weight on battleships is situated higher up compared to carriers.

    While I'm not an expert in shipbuilding, my understanding is that this weight distribution could impact stability.

    Implementing systems such as ballasts, gyros, and fins can help stabilize the ship and have been extensively tested to enhance overall stability.

    However, despite these measures, natural forces can still pose a challenge.

    In extreme situations, such as when the ship acts as a sail in strong winds or encounters a freak wave hitting its broadside, maintaining control becomes exceedingly difficult and potentially hazardous.

    Reply
  4. Zumwalt's tumblehome hull design turned out to be superior to a more common ship design. That's why I'm surprised that the US Navy gave up this forward leaning design for the next generation of destroyers, the DDG(X) which will sport a regular hull design found on the current ships. There have to be some other cons of the tumblehome design that prevent it from becoming a mainstay for all US naval ships (excluding aircraft carriers of course)..
    P.S. They also look freaking awesome, menacing and futuristic, don't they?

    Reply

Leave a Comment