If Israel and Lebanon Go to War – Who Loses?



In this video, we delve into the escalating tensions between Israel and Lebanon, following the high-profile assassinations of Hezbollah commander Fouad Shukur and Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh. With Israel crossing international borders to target these figures, the region teeters on the brink of war. We explore the potential military conflict between Israel and Lebanon, analyzing the strengths of each side, the involvement of key players like Hezbollah, and the broader implications for Middle Eastern stability.

#militarystrategy #militarydevelopments #militaryanalysis
#themilitaryshow

SOURCES: https://pastebin.com/rureuXz6

source

34 thoughts on “If Israel and Lebanon Go to War – Who Loses?”

  1. Israel went before Lebanon established a security zone; it did lose some troops holding it, but not many. I doubt the prolonged insurgency is an issue with her mood after Oct 7. Syria cannot even protect itself now.

    Reply
  2. this comparison is nonsense.
    comparing F35 to poorly equipped, poorly kept 80s Russian jets is like saying 1 bicycles equals 1 Ferrari.
    there’s a huge difference in military equipment and training quality.
    Israel had proven countless times it can freely attack in the depths of Lebanon and Sirya who were helpless.
    Israel has nukes it doesn’t mean to use, but they will never lose a war.
    the war in Gaza (not Palestine!) is taking longer due to politics and the hostages.
    there are no hostages is Lebanon and Sirya and open war against israel, if it takes the gloves off would be suicidal

    Reply
  3. This video, while interesting, misses the point on so many levels:
    1. As the video itself states, Hezbollah is the major political power in Lebanon, and effectively controls the Lebanese government. That, and the fact that Hezbollah is much stronger mean that the LAF will never fight against it. My guess it that in such a war it will offer token resistance but mostly try to sit it out
    2. Israel would not try to conquer Lebanon, or even its major cities – its got nothing to gain by doing so, and a lot to lose. But if Hezbollah targets Israel's major cities and infrastructure, then these cities would be decimated by bombing and shelling
    3. Syria is still decimated by its civil war. Assad would definitely sit such a war out. He can gain nothing, and a lot to lose. But in such a war Syria itself would likely be used as a staging ground for attacks, mostly by Iraqi militias
    4. Iran's air force is a joke, comprised mostly of antiquated aircrafts. Iran's navy, while larger than Israel's, has no ability to fight in the Mediterranean or the Red Sea. It would be wholly destroyed if it tries to make it there.
    5. Both Iran and Israel don't have the ability to fight a ground war against each other – they're simply too far away. There's no way for Iran to transport its army to Israel's borders.
    6. What Iran will likely do in such a scenario is fire missiles and drones at Israel. They can cause damage but as long as Iran isn't nuclear, they don't pose an existential threat.
    7. The war in Gaza is pretty much over. Israel won't have any problem diverting its forces from there to its north

    Reply
  4. You’re practically stupid for comparing Lebanese forces that don’t engage in any conflict with Israel. (Check last 30 years). You should be focusing on the comparison with Hezbollah that uses gorilla warfare and use 2006 and the liberation of south Lebanon in 2000 as an example

    Reply

Leave a Comment