How SpaceX Will Land On Mars



How The SpaceX Starship Will Land On Mars

Last Video: Something Weird Is Happening On Venus..
https://youtu.be/HZuAaCS4KC8

►Support the channel by purchasing from our merch store: https://shop.theteslaspace.com/
► Join Our Discord Server: https://discord.gg/zfMNSnuRQN
► Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/theteslaspace
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Space Race: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheTeslaSpace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBfN0491sF0SQRy0-pZBjdnBaU6JsWr4B

SpaceX News and Updates: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBfN0491sF0QGbrNimSIWKYeyQ7JjENhE

The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans’ mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race… you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!

► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: https://www.theteslaspace.com

Business Email: [email protected]

#Spacex #Space #Mars

source

26 thoughts on “How SpaceX Will Land On Mars”

  1. What about a hybrids nuclear energy source to go along with the solid hydrogen fuel? Perhaps light isotopes that decay releasing heat energy can be a pre option. Maybe the research should be in that direction, not put the cart before the horse. What’s the rush? We just need politicians stability on earth and not congratulate sociology with scientific breakthroughs. Working on feeding the masses on earth should be another limb of human advancement. Requires Apolitical agenda in parallel with scientific advancement. Indeed we have starving masses with I phones in hand.

    Reply
  2. Just hoping it's not an ocean gate innocent while entering the atmosphere. Reason I say is because of the oxygen inside starship. The rapid pressure change in Mars atmosphere versus pressure inside the starship is different simply because how oxygen reacts in that fast of change. Mars doesn't have breathable gas like inside the starship. The drones sent to Mars didn't have oxygen to contend with. I hope they can compensate the pressure change

    Reply
  3. A very good, well produced, well spoken video, nothing against that.
    Info for the Vid Viewer: The problem is, this 'Starship' is going to fail catastrophically continually upon landing. It is too tippy, it is inherently unstable and will topple right over even when it lands without immediately exploding.
    At time mark (11:21) this 2016 'SpaceX I.T.S.' looks a much better candidate – good, sturdy landing struts with wider stance and that aerodynamic lift body structure on the sides.
    Mistake Number 2: No Parachute. You have got to have a balloon/parachute (a 'ballute') system as an auxiliary/backup.
    Oversite, or Unmentioned: Artificial Gravity. Don't even entertain your fantasy of Mars W/O Art. Grav. ('don't leave home without it').
    Better yet, ditch all of these crazy, complicated designs in favor of Dr. Robert Zubrin's 'MarsDirect Hab/ERV' design approach (look it up). (13:42) 'StarShip' – "There is zero margin for error." MarsDirect has MANY built-in backup/safety features. You don't even go to Mars untill your return fuel has been generated on the Martian surface (again, look it up).
    We have got to start interjecting some common sense into our space science. Stop relying on billionaires' pipe dreams that want to 'innovate' so as to receive all of the accolades for themselves with their own trademarked designs rather than availing themselves of previous design breakthroughs.
    Something like the 'SpaceX I.T.S.' COULD be viable for the future, but it is too complex and non-redundant for now (think 'SpaceShuttle' DEAD END… literally).

    Reply
  4. You dont really understand orbital mechanics.. Once you speed up your orbit around the sun for a mars trajectory, the whole time your coasting to mars your slowing down. By the time you get to mars you would be going slower than the planet. Also, they wont use thrusters to circularize an orbit around mars. They will use atmospheric breaking and depending on how good the heat shield is, it may take a few laps before they can slow down enough to attempt a full re-entry. They will only need a small amount of fuel to perform orbital adjustments and land..

    Reply
  5. SpaceX will never land on Mars. Not even land a human on the moon. Soon WW III will break out, a nuclear war, which will kill about 4 to 6 billion humans. The whole human civilization will go down

    Reply
  6. So we will spend billions of dollars to travel and land on Mars which might be more boring that the Moon….at least the visible side of the Moon…..now if they go to the Dark side where all the action is…..they might have my attention….but what about Mars?….what are they going to do there?…..LOL take some rock samples….again?…..since that Russian boy seen on Youtube left Mars there is nothing there and nothing going on any longer!…..or is there? Might have to ask Kryon about this real soon?

    Reply
  7. LOL there is no need for fuel of any kind and there are people who know this and have known this for decades at least. I guess you have not watched the David Adair story on Youtube or Amazon Prime titled "UFO's and Area 51, David Adair at Area 51"…..and imagine that what he saw and learned about such things was in 1971…..that's a long time ago!

    Reply
  8. AI will surely enable us to eventually overcome some of the hurdles of providing the data required for learning without catastrophic failure of an actual craft surely? I know they say they need failures to learn from the data but it must be incredibly expensive. Not that Elon has anything to worry about on the money front 😂

    Reply

Leave a Comment