Admiral Beresford and the 2nd Pacific Squadron – What if Britain had gone to war?



Today we take a look at just how close the Royal Navy came to engaging the Russian 2nd Pacific Squadron, and what the most likely outcome of that would have been.

Sources:
https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1974/march/north-sea-incident-1904
The History of the Russo-Japanese War – Sydney Tyler
The Tsar’s Last Armada
MARITIME OPERATIONS IN THE RUSSO-JAPANESE WAR, 1904–1905 – Volume 2 – Sir Julian Corbett

Free naval photos and more – www.drachinifel.co.uk

Want to support the channel? – https://www.patreon.com/Drachinifel

Want a shirt/mug/hoodie – https://shop.spreadshirt.com/drachinifels-dockyard/

Want a poster? – https://www.etsy.com/uk/shop/Drachinifel

Want to talk about ships? https://discord.gg/TYu88mt

Want to get some books? www.amazon.co.uk/shop/drachinifel

Drydock Episodes in podcast format – https://soundcloud.com/user-21912004

Music – https://www.youtube.com/c/NCMEpicMusic

source

35 thoughts on “Admiral Beresford and the 2nd Pacific Squadron – What if Britain had gone to war?”

  1. A fascinating look at what might have been.

    However, when you talk about the Russian squadron being "interred" at Gibraltar, I really hope you meant "interned". The former is a funerary rite, while the latter is simple imprisonment.

    Reply
  2. Completely agree with your analysis. Rosesvenski was a realist. His mission was Japan not the RN. Likely would have communicated with St. Petersburg before attacking, assuming a mistake had been made. He would not have thrown away his nation's only chance to affect the Pacific situation.

    Reply
  3. I may be missing something obvious but what if following Dogger Bank the Russians decided to side step the British fleet and simply headed west. Could they have reached American ports to resupply and refit? Could the Russian fleet used the recently opened Panama Canal to enter the Pacific? They could have sailed North, topped off supplies in San Fransico and the headed the Western Pacific? It seems plausible and I believe American policy would have offered no impediment. I don’t believe the British would have wanted to expand this incident to include America by menacing the Russians in American waters or ports.

    Reply
  4. Rozhestvensky may be rational and value the lives of his men, but is the Tzar and does the Tzar value the lives of Rozhestvensky's men? I could easily see the Tsar or some Grand Duke or other relative in an important position order Rozhestvensky that if he is cornered to fight to the death for the honor of the motherland etc.

    Reply
  5. This is especially fascinating because had this happened 5 or so years earlier Great Britain would have definitely used the incident to instigate a war with Russia with a real possibility of German-British anti-Russian alliance. World would have looked drastically different had that happened

    Reply
  6. 2nd Pacific Squadron story deserves a mini series on Netflix. It has it all, vodka, action, adventure, comedy and tragedy. If there was romance, we don't want to know. Even a Science Fiction show that modified and copied the story, – it's Gold. Titanic X 30.

    Reply
  7. Alternatively he stalls long enough to communicate with Moscow last, who's tangential grip on reality results in him being ordered to fight to the last shell. He had, after all been sent to die anyway.

    Reply
  8. Think of all the hardship Rozhezventsky could have been saved if he had been annihilated by the British in the channel or off Portugal or Gibraltar instead of sailing halfway around the world to meet that fate. Dudeski just couldn't catch a break with a net.

    Reply
  9. That's a lot of preparation to be ready to sacrifice millions of pounds or rubles, and hundreds of lives, over accidentally sinking 1 fishing boat.

    Yes, the Russians were idiots to think Japanese torpedo boats were to be found in the North Sea, having experience with their own torpedo boats (and based on current events they clearly haven't had any great increase in IQ over the last century).

    But the idea of nations going to war and fleets battling it out, with potentially great loss, over something as simple as "Our bad, won't do it again, here's a thousand rubles for a new boat and another hundred for some lost cod" seems, to me at least, to be quite ludicrous.

    Reply
  10. Either looking at what really happened or in a What-if scenario such as this one, you can't help but having some simpathy for Rozhestvensky. A proper candidate to the "Semper Iratus" tittle after Admiral King. The man had some solid balls of steel and a good brain, as well.

    One minor quip on this one, Drach. Kamchatka didn't pull any shenanigans, like sinking a trawler off the coast of Vigo, ramming the wharf at Tangiers or happily signaling the Royal Navy to stay away or risk be sunk.

    Cheers!

    Reply
  11. The diplomatic side is mostly new to me, and it's kind of amazing: history somehow found a way to make the 2nd Pacific Squadron's experience even worse than it seemed before.

    Reply
  12. Several people have probably made this comment already but I came away from this video with, "I can take you in warm, or I can take you in cold." stuck in my head.

    Reply
  13. What a treat to find more flesh on the story of the Voyage of the Damned! From the (now recovered) Covid patient you made laugh with the first video. Thanks Drach!

    Reply
  14. Would have been better for Imperial Russia if the British Fleet had sunk the 2nd Pacific Squadron since then the Tsar could claim it was two on one war, thus losing and ending the war with a peace treaty that had British negotiator influencing the Imperial Japan to lessen their demand, the British didn't want their Ally in the Pacific to win so decisively against a European power lest other Asian country might think they could do the same to the British and other colonial power in manner similar to Imperial Japan did to Imperial Russia.

    Reply
  15. I firmly believe that if war did break out. They would have actually gone with the plan to meet them ship for ship. Because deploying Home Fleet against them would be the furthest thing from Cricket possible.

    Reply

Leave a Comment