Why NATO may have to stop a Russian invasion – without the US



Europe has just three years to get ready for an attack by Russia on NATO, and could end up losing a war against Vladimir Putin. That was the apocalyptic-sounding warning from both Poland’s secretary of state and a respected German think-tank in recent weeks. It is even conceivable that Europe could have to defend itself without the help of the United States – the backbone of NATO. Could the continent survive?

#dailymail #russia #ukraine

Daily Mail Homepage: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/

Daily Mail Facebook: https://facebook.com/dailymail
Daily Mail IG: https://instagram.com/dailymail
Daily Mail Snap: https://www.snapchat.com/discover/Daily-Mail/8392137033
Daily Mail Twitter: https://twitter.com/MailOnline
Daily Mail Pinterest: https://pinterest.co.uk/dailymail

Get the free Daily Mail mobile app: https://dailymail.co.uk/mobile

source

29 thoughts on “Why NATO may have to stop a Russian invasion – without the US”

  1. second biggest army in Ukraine attack NATO? Haha this inst Aprils fools. West tanks which are sent to Ukraine are outdated they will not sent last gen upgrades. Even Tank armour is weakened to make more fair for russia. NATO have nukes I don't think Mr putin have balls to start other stupidity again.

    Reply
  2. Russian ambassador to US Antonov: Ukraine lost opportunity to favourable settlement and only thing acceptable to Moscow is full capitulation.

    Who helped Ukraine to lose this opportunity 2022 Istanbul peace agreement? Boris from stinking island.

    Reply
  3. 0:38 no, the problem ukruane is having is quanitiy NOT quality.

    Becides you sre forgetting they are not the SAME weapons. Ukriane don't have trident 2 D5LE missiles or french M51 missiles with 300kt warheads. Did they?

    Reply
  4. i think its the other way round, i think Europe / Nato are cleverly inviting / poking at Russia to make the error of attacking them, and in doing so give's the west a reason to weaken Russia, eventually maybe forcing them to become a part of the allience themselves and ultimatly… encircleing asia and the middle east in the process. i dont believe for a second Russia has the ability to conquer Europe, even without America's backing.

    Look, Bring European Air and sea power, a full force of ground vehicles, infantry units, secret services into the equation and Russia will be like a dog cowering with its tail between its legs

    Reply
  5. This is a no-brainer: China turns its factory to war production for Russia and Iran. Iran opens up a 2nd front to prevent Europe from flanking Russia. Russia attack through Germany then straight through Belgium, France and to Italy.

    Reply
  6. Throughout Western propaganda there is a pervasive idea that Putin personally initiated the war. That it was his personal whim, the ambitions of a tyrant and dictator. Nobody wants to admit that this was a collective decision of several Russian security committees and meetings of the most influential people in the Russian Federation. Putin only reflects the interests of Russia as a state, the interests of the people and the ruling elite of the Russian Federation. Therefore, support for Putin does not stem from fear, but from the basis of the necessity of what is happening.

    Reply
  7. Why the west always portray Russia as bad and evil ? This is fearmongering at best.. If the NATO hadn't tried to include Ukraine in the first place, Russia wouldn't have attacked Ukraine.. The vile west must stop villainizing Putin

    Reply

Leave a Comment