Why London’s “Harrods Of The East” Didn’t Quite Go To Plan



In the 1920s, the Wickham family decided to demolish a row of shops in London’s East End, in order to build a grand new department store – one that could rival Harrod’s and Selfridges in the West. They signed a big budget contract with the builders, and shipped in all the stone at great expense. There was just one problem: one of the shopkeepers didn’t want to sell…

INSTA – https://www.instagram.com/the.tim.traveller
TWIT – https://twitter.com/TheTimTraveller
FACE – https://www.facebook.com/TheTimTraveller/

FURTHER READING
Story of the buildings on Lookup London – https://lookup.london/spiegelhalter-mile-end-road/
Spiegelhalter family history about the shop – https://www.yorkbeach.co.uk/family_history/spiegelhalter/shop.html
Department Stores Of My Youth by Stories of London: stories-of-london.org/youth/

PHOTO CREDITS
Nail House by Zhou Shuguang – https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7a/Chongqing_yangjiaping_2007.jpg

source

42 thoughts on “Why London’s “Harrods Of The East” Didn’t Quite Go To Plan”

  1. Probably should've seen if the Spiegelhalters would've allowed them to redo their shops façade to match the rest of their building – maybe tossing in an extra couple of floors to sweeten the deal…

    Reply
  2. We have our own nail house in Haarlem, The Netherlands. It's a pharmacy called Van der Pigge, still going strong as a herb/drugstore, around which the department store V&D was built in the 1920's. V&D went bankrupt around 2016.

    Reply
  3. A very similar story as the Victory hotel in Amsterdam. (Right across from Amsterdam Central station). The is a movie made about this story called ‘Publieke werken’ or ‘A Noble Intention’ in English.

    Reply
  4. There's an analogous situation in San Antonio, Texas, USA. The famous Joske's Department Store was in expansion mode and tried without any success to buy out the small St. Joseph Catholic Church. So, the five-story Art Deco store building (now called "Shops at Rivercenter") was built very tightly around the church property on three sides. See the third photo in the Wikipedia article "Joske's" for an excellent view.

    Reply
  5. In America they would have offered a price to the owner and if they refused they’d tear their house down without paying them. If you think that’s a joke, remember in America you do not own the land your house is on. And they’ve done this throughout history, mainly for railroad and actual highway construction still to this day.

    Reply
  6. 5:35 "thanks to a local campaign, the historic frontage was saved"
    Well, this is stupid. I am 100% for respecting the wishes of the Spiegelhalters while they were there, but after they left, it was clearly time to finish the structure, and the local council are now stuck with an embarrasing eyesore. Great move, that, not.

    Reply
  7. There is a place like this in my neighborhood in Portland, 4 story appartment complex takes up an entire block and there is just one other building on the block: a house someone refused to sell, I think they sold the house and then it got re-zoned so now it's a cute little house shaped 2 story office building with a nice garden

    Reply

Leave a Comment