Why MatPat Might Actually Be Right… – (Five Nights at Freddy’s Security Breach Theory)
Hey everyone!!!! In today’s video we talk about how MatPat’s recent FNAF Game Theory on The Game Theorists might actually be right! This FNAF Game Theory is amazing and I have actually had this FNAF Security Breach theory for a while! I hope you all enjoy the video 🙂
GTLIVE: https://www.youtube.com/c/GTLive
The Game Theorists: https://www.youtube.com/user/MatthewPatrick13
In The Hall Of The Mountain King: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLp_Hh6DKWc
FOLLOW ME!!!!
FUHNAFF TWITTER: https://twitter.com/FuhNaff
PERSONAL TWITTER: https://twitter.com/JohnAndrewYT
INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/johnandrewyt/
JOHN ANDREW: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoFmDobJxqJbofh1G5nKYuA
I do think that Gregory is a robot version of CC, but I do not think that Glamrock Freddy is Michael. There is a lot of evidence that points towards Gregory being a robot version of the CC, such as William (or possibly Michael) wanting to “build him back together,” even going as far as stuffing him in the Fredbear suit. It would make sense if (in another attempt) Michael or William would make Gregory to bring him back to life. Now on to Glamrock Freddy. I don’t see how Michael could have survived the ending of pizzeria simulator. His body would have disintegrated and he would have burned to death.
I have a theory…
If Micheal is possessing Freddy… where is Henry? He died in the same fire but even if Micheal "survived" then Henry might've survived as well
And we do know that Evan Afton and Cassidy possesses Golden Freddy…
Is there a possibility that Micheal and Henry possesses Freddy?
I know it sounds tired to theorize about 'x is actually y', but I think it's actually really poetic for it to be a reunion of Evan and Michael, with Michael finally being able to make it up to Evan, and even the rejection of William's selfish ambitions at the hands of none other than his own children. Corny and too on the nose? Sure, but game series like FNAF thrive on a limited amount of threads being added into it as they grow bigger. The more lines can be drawn by the community, the better, and I think that's a really beautiful thing for Scott to have done
I was there. you called it. I also think Gregory's illusion disk is behind the ban-ade on his cheek, because that is a reasonable hiding spot, and people would assume it's just a scratch. There is just too much evidence to say this is fake, it makes too much sense with the evidence we have.
I still dunno why this is so controversial xD People acting like this theory is ridiculous… like everything else in this series is anymore realistic lmao
i hate this theory sm but its probably true lmfao
broken is 100% intentional and the fact that the dialogue was changed just further proves that. not disprove it. and him being a robot just makes more sense than not considering the events of the game
5:03 "we don't know, and we will probably never know for the next 5-10 years."
YUP PRETTY MUCH SUMS UP THE WHOLE SERIES
no because i like the idea that it was michael who rebuilt the crying child after the fire. he believed that he had fixed the problems there, and fixed the last one. he was the one who got his brother killed, and he was the one to fix him. then he later died, went onto haunt freddy, to help him take down this establishment once and for all because he lacked a physical body to do it with. that would explain the “fatherly vibe” we get from freddy. it’s a guardian thing. i also feel like there’s symbolism between children being put into animatronics, it used to be a bad thing, and now it’s a good thing, used to the advantage. two brothers defeating their father, who ruined their lives. but of course, this franchise is funky, and we don’t know what the true ending is, not that this story will ever end.
This intro had me rolling 😂
I'll accept that Gregory is a robot, but I highly doubt Freddy is Michael and Vanny 10000% isn't Elizabeth
No nope no I called it first, I know I have no evidence but as soon as I saw Gregory I talk to my self about the theory and I so called it
I can’t tell did mat-pat copy or not?
Nah cause we all know you got it first- I was on that stream, it was before matpats theory- but hey- no hate on either
i love how he already knew this all
The blaring music just makes it that much better
The similarities between Gregory and the crying child are wishy washy at best and outlandish at worst. Yeah, they have a hair stripe in the middle of their faces, but the way the rest of the hair is shows that… that's just not good ground to stand on. Same for the shirt with stripes. The colours on the shirts are different, the colours on the shorts are different, the colour of the eyes is different (but that is arguable if we assume that at least one of the Afton kids is adopted).
If we want to have one physical similarity and leave out everything that contradicts said similarity, sure, you can see crying child in Gregory if you squint reeeaally hard.
But here's the thing. Gregory and the crying child have contrasting personalities! One is called the crying child because he cries, and the other is the most badass child I've ever seen, destroying the same animatronics the other would have been too afraid to be in a radius of 10 metres! Now tell me how on earth these two are supposed to be the same character.
You didn't mention this, but since you said Matthew was right, here's one more for the list. MatPat said that Gregory has been living in the hidden rooms and all that where there are animatronic parts. He says that he's been using them to get himself fixed. Here's the thing though, if Gregory is getting himself fixed as a robot would, why does he not want to be turned into a meat pretzel at the beginning of the game? //that is, if we assume Gregory has been using these rooms, which wouldn't make sense for various reasons.
We know Gregory thinks of himself as human, but after some time he would expect to grow, right? Maybe he's only been activated recently, sure, but then why would he have only been activated now?
Crying is normal in a situation of danger, of course the writing on the wall will be trying to comfort the reader.
Admittedly, we do not know how Gregory got in. Given his masterful stealth, I wouldn't put it past him to have sneaked in during the day. What we know, however, is that it was always his intention to leave the mall – had he been an animatronic/child staying in the pizzaplex this whole time, he would have been able to get out however long he's been in there for.
There is absolutely no reason to believe that Glamrock Freddy has any connection with Michael Afton. Sure, let's assume that Gregory and the crying child are the same. So what? There is nothing to make that connection other than the fact that Freddy is being nice to a kid, the same way he was programmed to do. Big deal.
I have no explanation for Gregory being broken. However, if we are talking of the same kind of "broken" as the crying child, simply taking Gregory to a first aid station is… not enough by far. It is true that we never hear "You are broken" ever again, but what we do hear is the line that comes after. "I will put you back together" is not just something said in FNaF 4. Instead, in The Fourth Closet, Michael Brooks says very much the same thing – he puts drawings of the missing children back together, then draws on top of them. This is very much putting the fragmented souls and agony back together, a healing process that would have allowed the children to move on to the afterlife. If this was ever promised to the crying child, I assure you it wouldn't have been by remaking him into a robot and releasing him in the pizzaplex.
The "I sense you are broken" line is the only thing that makes the idea of these two being remotely related less outlandish. I don't like to use unused data as evidence, that would be stupid and that would make the Faz-facts canon, which would open a whole new can of plot holes, so I agree that Gregory bleeding is not the truth in the game.
it’s so funny bc ppl were dragging him so hard
If anybody thinks it can’t be true, this is a series about ghosts, zombies, and of course, friggin fazgoo
Ok. Fine. Glamrock freddy doesn't get controlled because. 1. Gregory looks exactly like crying child. 2. Gregory makes Freddy remember. 3. Michael is freddy. 5. Michael feels bad about killing his brother. 6. Gregory is a random kid. 7. I am right 8. I am right 9. I am right 10. I am right 11. I am right 12. I am right 13. I am right 14. I am not right because we will never know
But burntrap is able to posesse glamrock freddy while Gregory is inside and it dosent affect him, only freddy
Look I get why it's compelling to beleave this. But I'm against both sides. I don't get why it has to be one of two camps, gregbot cc or Greg human.
To counter the crying child argument. What would be the point? Like the actual point. Yes yellow text once said "I will put you back together" but what's the point, William is using a recharge station and able to control other robots why not Gregory, why is he possessing glamrock freddy to kill his own son, why rebuild him just to kill him, it makes no sense. "yes son ill put you back together so I can kill you again won't that be fun"
Second on being a robot this idea he is a robot that isn't aware he is a robot is dumb, in the books it had a reason, Henry went mad and tried to rebuild Charlie, he gave her ways to grow older, he had his sister raise Charlie to be independent. None of this happened with Gregory, we are just told to beleave the world farted him into existance with basic memory, told that his disgust at seeing a naked endo is because he isn't aware he is one yet he had nobody teaching him that he was human like Charlie had.
You can't just have it both ways, you can't say he is unaware he is a robot and fully thinks he is human when there was nobody to teach him he was human as a robot like Charlie did.
The he dosent eat, go to the toilet stuff is nonsense, this isn't the sims, how many video games require you to go to the toilet.
Both these theories are impossible, why can't Gregory just be some young theif that keeps breaking into the Pizzaplex, kids can hotwire cars ect.
I'm tired of the fnaf community only ever taking two sides, there's other options. He is not a self aware robot unaware he is a robot, it's so much a reach, it's like me saying glamrock freddy is a transformer because that existed before fnaf.
So is William rebuilt his son why would he try to kill him
Why would he keep it from vanessa
Actually Gregory gets told he is broken due to Sony censorship, the line would have been "You are bleeding" also I don't buy the whole crying Child deal because Gregory's outfit is different from the crying child's in color. meaning by Matpat's own logic it can't be because everything is color sensitive. this is a game where we look at the dialogue color for hidden lore for crying out loud meaning Gregory isn't the child put back together because his shirt is blue and not black. there is really no evidence to him being the crying child or a robot. he can't be a robot because of ONE massively overlooked detail, that is Burntrap, Burntrap is able to control Freddy as soon as Freddy steps in the old pizzeria NOT Gregory, Burntrap can't control humans only machines. and before you say it Vanessa was taken over by soul swapping which is different.
One correction. The wall code does not say "Not real, still keen" it says "Not real, still me" Great vid though.