What's This Survey?! Reforged SOFT RELAUNCH?! – WC3 – Grubby



Blizzard just came up with a survey on different aspects of WC3 Reforged and how people feel towards them… Could they be planning a soft relaunch? What do you think? Time to speculate!

What’s This Survey?! Reforged SOFT RELAUNCH? (Game played on 21-January-2022)

Catch me live all days of the week at: https://twitch.tv/grubby

Join my Discord! https://discord.gg/rMq6JUbQ2Y

00:00 NEW Survey
12:50 Profiles
25:15 Campaign/Reforged Graphics

#Grubby #WC3

source

50 thoughts on “What's This Survey?! Reforged SOFT RELAUNCH?! – WC3 – Grubby”

  1. Clans, global custom games and such are already in the game, I think the problem is the start of the survey was done before some of those features went live in 1.33 and the like, or it could simply be management issues that they don't actually know those features are live now.

    Reply
  2. Hoi Grubby, So maybe I'm worg. But today I started my first ever online versus match on Bnet. And I saw this button, 'clan'. Does this mean that they have implemented clans?

    Groetjes uit Zuid-Holland

    Reply
  3. Blizzcon 2018 GFX was the best wc3 ever look like..Lighting shadows team colours environment and on…Problem is they didnt finish it so if they bring back blizzcon 2018 GFX i am happy .. 😀

    Reply
  4. Do we have confirmation that Microsoft have acquired Blizzard/Activision? If so this would be their first W.
    From the Blizzard side. Can't speak much on Overwatch 2, from what I hear it's simply OW1 with some of their bad decisions reversed.

    Reply
  5. Grubby, would you be able to specifically mention how chat in custom game lobbies is absolutely broken please? Each time someone joins, leaves, or moves to another slot, everyone automatically deselects chat. At best, this is annoying. At worst, it means that it's almost impossible to kick someone who constantly moves slots AND it means that the host will accidentally hit the hotkey to start the game while intending to type. It's a massive headache to balance teams and whatnot. It really makes it harder. Thank you!

    Reply
  6. I don't think it will grow if they fix it.
    Maybe if they make it f2p then the playerbase will grow which will grow the modding base and make it a hit again. After that they can monitize it somehow.

    Reply
  7. It's been a tradition of mine for… many years to replay the WC3 campaign when my internet goes down.
    On Blizzcon when they did the Culling of Stratholme mission and there were like "mini bosses" in the houses sometimes and the new graphics and so on… I was so hyped – to be able to play the campaign again but… with a twist. With something new, fresh…
    Then WC3R released… I'm so pissed I still haven't played the "new" "old" campaign… You can't be like "we're revamping the campaign" then… butcher the whole game and not do that.

    Reply
  8. Maybe it's because English isn't my first language, but I find the question to be a bit weirdly worded. "How appealing". What are they asking, exactly? How happy I am with each of the features, currently? Or how important I find them?

    Reply
  9. i would love to be in matches with grubby, what about all them people i played with on U.S. West Lordereon (Raw Talent) (AOTD-INSIDIOUS) (Animadversion) (One-handed Micro) (Too much carry) (owr) (Destruboy021) (Super pro dude) plenty of more & i know they got (Grubby) (MyM.Moon) (Fov) (sci.war) (Lucifer) (Happy) (Sky)

    Reply
  10. After playing azeroth reborn, one thing I want is unlimited control group size. I played a lot of wc3 when I was young an loved it, but control wise it feels dated and hard to wield after getting used to sc2. I don't really have much incentive to return knowing that I wont have the dexterity to play at the speed I'd like to, while also knowing that there is very little reason for new players to adopt the game over sc2 or other future RTS that don't have tarnished reputations or clunky gameplay. Keep an option, of course, for 12 unit control group size, and even let you choose to limit your matches to others doing the same while using it, but bring unlimited control group size for those of us who will never reach the top and for custom games to.

    Reply
  11. They could name it like: Warcraft III Hellish Destruction or Warcraft III: Hero's Doom… thus it remains adequately epic and abbreviates to W3:HD. ✍️

    "Re-name" is already taken and HD would differentiate it nicely. Like Age of Empires did with it's different iterations. 👌

    Reply
  12. I cant recomend never this game and never do when you release a diferent style of game and try try try to have things with before work fine in w3 normal game … but noooo you delete the w3 classics and no have the options to buy just the w3 classics to play what version like more( 1.26 , 1.27 and 1.28) is dat why 1.26 is the perfect version and still is played but a lot of people in RGC-gameranger-eurobatle, rubatle, atinad.-… blizzard have no idea to do with real fans like me with no like new version ( i try 1.30.4 and before dat no try dat new version is just stupid bugged and horrendous) just give back w3 classic like sc remastered … just want the old versions… dracolich do a better work in less time with 1.26 dota 1 and blizzard need 1 o 2 years more to give a decent version… and people still wait re reforged and more stupid things…. sooo cuckoldsss .zzzzzzZzzzzz

    Reply
  13. why this survey didn't reach us all specially who purchased the game and didn't refund it 😀
    that's not fair ^ ^
    if they will make a survey like this it should reach many of players not few..
    any way i think most clarified points here is the most that we want.. Thank You ^ ^

    Reply
  14. I don't know if a soft relaunch would even be enough to revive the game at this point. It feels like Blizzard already destroyed their remaining credibility among old school players. They obviously dropped the ball hard with Reforged launch, but their handling of it post-launch (and a lot of other decisions they've made since then not directly related to the game) really cemented their disdain for the community.

    Maybe if they actually delivered on everything promised with Reforged and went the extra mile to make a true HD version of the game AND on top of that, gave the classic version of the game away for free like they did with SC, maybe they could breathe life into it again. To maintain it long term, though, they need to actually support the community – in particular, heavily support map makers, both those making competitive melee maps and those making custom game modes. Honestly as far as I'm concerned WC3 is to this day still the best custom game hub available. The variety of creative game modes in WC3 still completely blows Dota 2 and Starcraft 2 arcades out of the water. The fact that Blizzard never really supported the map making community and in fact only alienated them with their new terms of service with the launch of Reforged is an incredibly stupid decision.

    Reply
  15. I really hope we get to see Classic + graphics like they did in Starcraft II because it would offer a good in-between for people like me who don't like the reforged graphics but are getting a little tired of the 2003 graphics. It of course shouldn't be the priority since the game has many other more important issues still to this day but I think it would be a good plus and a little apology letter to everybody for bought the game back in 2020.

    Reply

Leave a Comment