Thin-Skinned Trooper Goes Off When Pedestrian Interrupts His Traffic Shakedown | 1st Amendment FAIL



If you support what I’m doing here & wanna help me produce more content:
https://cash.app/$HighImpactDonate
☕️ Buy me a coffee or two: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/HighImpactFlix
⭐ SubscribeStar: https://www.subscribestar.com/highimpactflix
🔴 Grab a Hard-Hitting Original Design: http://bit.ly/HighImpactFlix-Merch
📬 Snail Mail: P.O. Box 1454 Tahlequah, Ok 74465 📬
⭐ SubscribeStar: https://www.subscribestar.com/highimpactflix

🔵 Private Email List: http://bit.ly/HighImpactFlixOfficial
(don’t forget to CONFIRM)
🔵 Email: [email protected]

***Music Intro Credit
https://dessherwood.hearnow.com/
email: [email protected]
web site: www.dessherwood.com
youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCC6AhNFQ4RjO6hXSwWP3vew

This video is intended for educational and entertainment purposes ONLY and is in no way meant to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. Nothing in this video should be considered a “call to action.” It was created to educate individuals on constitutionally protected activities, case law and individual rights and emphasize the important roll legal action plays in constitutional activism as well as the importance of constitutional awareness.

With this in mind, the facts presented in my videos are not necessarily indicative of my personal opinion in all cases, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. None of my videos be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

source

34 thoughts on “Thin-Skinned Trooper Goes Off When Pedestrian Interrupts His Traffic Shakedown | 1st Amendment FAIL”

  1. Make that video. I’ve been listening closely to Alphonso’s vids. If there are more along the same lines drop the links? It’s interesting but doubt I could afford the court fees taking on that fight

    Reply
  2. For real this jacked up roid armed thug sanctioned by the state is out of control …. That ultra tight shirt especially the 2 short sleeves must be cutting circulation to his already fried brain 🧠… it’s absolutely outrageous he’s got one thing correct … that is the guys 1A right was obstructing his so called investigation … the only thing he was obstructing was the officers intelligence … OMG they’re absolutely princesses now heavens forbid we hurt their ego’s and unlawful directives by speech … it’s throw them all in jail now how f@cking scarily dangerous is our overlords are becoming ….

    Reply
  3. The 14th amendment is about companies..according to the UNITED States codes a person is a company. And according to title 18, 911 no one can be a UNITED States citizen.. so when it says born in the United States.. your parent's created a company when you were born and when someone comes to this country the right way they nationalize their company into the United States.. the 14th amendment is about THE SOCIAL SECURITY CONTRACT "THE SS5".

    Reply
  4. I am retired military and if you want tattoos in the military they have to be covered up while on duty.
    This roid raging coward would be better off working at the carnival. He is all into the intimidation thing and needs to be severely dealt with.

    Reply
  5. STATE POLICE think and act like they are Seal Team 6. Only We The People are not Isis and don't need to be shot on sight. Yet, here's a great example of their condescending, arrogant actions against UNARMED CITIZENS as if they were.

    Reply
  6. Brian I'm fighting a driving on a suspension ticket in the state of Florida. Bulletcasey2310@gmail.com
    I technically ran a red light 🚦 and that's were the road piracy started. My attorney I fired said there is no laws to travel the highway. I sent him some case laws. And of course he came up with every excuse

    Reply
  7. Wait a minute ?
    I thought only the prosecuting attorney could make a deal so Here's The Deal ,

    Always Film these PIGS
    Always hold them accountable
    And
    NEVER NEVER NEVER
    Let them violate OUR Constitutional Rights

    Reply
  8. The Law only get 40% percent of their pay check from Tax payers

    The other 60% percent is from speeding tickets, drug busts, DUI/DWI stops and WARRENTS

    This is why they want to run your I.D.
    Because these PIGS want PAID

    Reply
  9. The 1st amendment does NOT SAY “freedom of speech” is protected, AS LONG AS THAT SPEECH CARRIES WIT IT THE “expression of ideas” or has “social value” . . . does it? Hmmm . . . ???
    Therefore, the Chaplinsky SCOTUS decision is guilty of illegal and legislative PERVERSION by INJECTING A NEW AMENDMENT INTO THE CONSTITUTION! Or, at the very least, of MODIFYING a central aspect – free speech – of the first amendment . . . WHICH IS “REPUGNANT TO THE CONSTITUTION!”

    Reply
  10. the only people corrupt scumbag pigs protect and serve are their fellow corrupt scumbag pigs,end qualified immunity to get corrupt power tripping mentally unstable pigs off the streets and in prison where they belong and then sue them and ruin them financially

    Reply
  11. Yes, if we go by “reactions” of hearers, then we would still have slavery! THOSE DEMOCRAT HEARERS of ABOLITION were OFFENDED at the idea of freedom given to black American citizens!

    Reply
  12. I came to the exact same conclusion not long after joining the New Mexico Constitutionalist 3pers and going to a couple get togethers. And the way they treat their "brothers and sisters" is another reason why I feel being a loner is far better than being with a group of people pretending to give a crap about you. The "Patriot" groups are a joke for the most part. If they weren't then we would already be in a revolution and these tyrants and terrorists would be swinging in the wind or we'd at least be very near said revolution. Talk talk talk and dressing like Rambo's is about all they're about. It's really sad too …

    Reply
  13. If there are “limitations” to our Constitutional rights, just WHOM are they that have been GIVEN SUCH AUTHORITY as to LIMIT those rights? And more importantly, exactly FROM WHERE do such AUTHORITIES come?
    According to our Founding Documents the “liberties” that those Documents inscribe are given to CITIZENS ONLY (not to government or its agents), an it is given to us BY GOD!
    These original Founding Documents – metaphorically speaking, “etched in stone” – were listed, specified, and were blessed to We the People “BY OUR CREATOR.”
    Would it not then follow, NECESSARILY, that if there are such “LATER ADDED LIMITATIONS” by SCOTUS abridging those GOD-GIVEN RIGHTS as Chaplinsky would claim, shouldn’t such limitations be – at the very least – HANDED DOWN FROM GOD AS WELL?!
    Our Framers DID NOT declare The Supreme Court as our GIVER OF RIGHTS.
    Seems that our lofty, black-robed nine suffer from a bit of “identity” confusion.

    Reply
  14. I appreciate that you put yourself out there to possible condemnation and ridicule by sharing and defending your thoughts on these matters. I don’t always agree with your positions but each of your video gives me stuff to contemplate and challenges my current positions. Some of my positions have come more in line with your own. Well done.

    Reply
  15. Yes but you're a subject to our form of government, by and for the people. Yes this nation isn't run by the people anymore but that's what you were originally subject to.

    Reply
  16. Some would argue that the 14th Amendment doesn't apply to the men and women of the land because we aren't "persons," we are human beings. Some would argue that it's simply clever word play used to trick people into thinking it applies to them. Person can mean all kinds of things. No one or no thing seems to try and apply citizenship, but rather it's something claimed by the people on pieces of paper. Are you a US citizen? Check this box. Well how did I become one and where is my notice?

    Reply
  17. Constitution overrules case law.

    Congress shall make no law abridging the Freedom of speech.

    No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states.

    Therefore the courts cannot criminalize or fine any American citizen for anything they say, type, write, print, text, comment, tweet, post, video.

    U.C.C. 1-308 all rights reserved with extreme prejudice,Freedom of speech.

    Reply
  18. The cop should be charged and prosecuted under title 5 U.S.C. 3331,3333,7311 Perjury in violating oath of office, title 18 U.S.C. section 241 conspiracy against rights, title 18 U.S.C. section 242 deprivation of rights under color of law.

    U.C.C. 1-308 all rights reserved with extreme prejudice,Freedom of speech.

    Reply
  19. The supreme Court is in bad behavior waring against their oaths and the constitution. They cannot uphold their oath and war against it.

    U.C.C. 1-308 all rights reserved with extreme prejudice,Freedom of speech.

    Reply
  20. Thing is law enforcement are not justice.

    Justice is a judge and jury.

    Law enforcement exist nowhere in the constitution of the united states of America.

    U.C.C. 1-308 all rights reserved with extreme prejudice, Freedom of speech.

    Reply
  21. The justice department has been illegally unconstitutionally operating for the past 150 years.

    U.C.C. 1-308 all rights reserved with extreme prejudice, Freedom of speech.

    Reply

Leave a Comment