And it could swing the 2024 elections.
Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don’t miss any videos: http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
In 2013, a divided Supreme Court gutted one of the major pillars of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. In the 10 years since then, the court has moved even farther to the right. So when the Voting Rights Act came before the Supreme Court again in 2022, it didn’t look good for the law. But then something completely unexpected happened: in a 5-4 decision, two of the conservative justices voted with the 3 liberal justices to preserve the Voting Rights Act. And the effects could be huge.
At stake in the case was the way that Alabama divides up its Congressional districts. Alabama has seven districts, one of which is what’s called a “majority-minority district” in which Black Americans are the majority of the population. In 2022, a group of Black voters sued the state, saying that under the law, Alabama should actually have two majority-minority districts. And the Supreme Court agreed.
The reason this matters to the rest of the country is that Alabama’s not alone — several other states in the south are now vulnerable to similar challenges that would increase the number of majority-minority districts. And especially in a region of the country where voting is racially polarized — where white people overwhelmingly vote Republican and Black people vote Democrat — this decision has the potential to flip multiple Congressional seats in the next election. And in a US House of Representatives where Republicans only hold control by a margin of 10 votes or so, that’s a big deal.
Sources and further reading:
In 2021 every state in the US with more than one Congressional district redrew them. CNN has a great tool that looks at each state’s Congressional district map before and after that redistricting, and tracks how many majority-minority districts each state has: https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2022/politics/us-redistricting/georgia-redistricting-map/
FiveThirtyEight has a similar tool: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/redistricting-2022-maps
Many of those new district maps are under legal challenge. The Brennan Center for Justice has a really thorough roundup of every legal case underway against those maps: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/redistricting-litigation-roundup-0
The Brennan Center also has a great summary of the Alabama case: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/merrill-v-milligan-gerrymandering-supreme-court
A big part of the Alabama case was determining whether drawing a second majority-black district would be easy. The mathematician Moon Duchin wrote a brief report for the court that demonstrates that really succinctly: https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2022-02/Duchin_Report.pdf
The Guardian built a cool interactive that shows the gerrymandering in Alabama really well: https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/jun/08/alabama-discrimination-black-voters-map-supreme-court
Naturally I recommend reading Vox.com’s Ian Millhiser breaking down the Alabama decision: https://www.vox.com/scotus/2023/6/8/23753932/supreme-court-john-roberts-milligan-allen-voting-rights-act-alabama-racial-gerrymandering
And Vox’s Christian Paz on the political implications of the case: https://www.vox.com/voting-rights/23754443/supreme-court-alabama-voting-rights-act-congress-democrats-house-louisiana-south-carolina
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what’s really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com.
Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE
Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o
Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H
source
EVERY American needs to read THE COLOR OF LAW by Robert Rothstein!
ain't watching this video but why my state illegal😡😡😡😡
Why does the video omit the the details from the actual decision (regarding the reason for the decision) and, in effect, cast doubt on the credibility of the judges and their ability to make sound judgment based on the rule of law and the rules of logic and not just arbitrary personal feelings?
How about we get some moderate judges in!
Imagine having a justice system that isnt impartial. Thats rough.
Love how the government can interfere with the state. This country is a joke
I feel like I’m missing something
I've been saying it since the 1970s when I was still a little kid……..A district should be completely built from a collect of whole counties. In larger metropolitan areas where a county may have too many citizens to make one district……a district would be built from complete cities within a county or two cities bordering each other within neighboring counties. A district that includes a city or county and then runs for 90 miles down a highway only including the highway and then open up to include another city or county just to increase or decrease the demographics within that district is absolutely bonkers
BUT VOX, THEY ALWAYS PICK HORRIBLE LEADERS.
Judges having any partial/partisan views whatsoever entirely defeats the point of them being judges in the first place.
Ohio voted in 2022 with illegal maps. There have been no consequences to the GOP.
The tiniest, minuscule glimmer of hope 🤞🏼
The fact the we have to hope for Supreme Court Judges to do the right thing doesn’t feel like a victory.
"Gerrymandering" has a hard "g" (like "Gary")
Go vote!
Majority-minority districts. Ok. A bit of an oxymoron.
Someone in the comments has come up with one of the greatest malapropisms of all time: "jury meandering".
(Apols if English isn't their first language, not intended as a dig – it's just funny).
I know exactly how to fix this challenge.
Yeah that's where the Democrats think everyone there owes him a vote when they're just using a black people as Pawns
Or color!