Starfield Just Got Its Biggest Update Yet… – Is It Enough?



There’s quite a lot to talk about with Starfield today! For starters, Bethesda just released a sizeable patch for Starfield. Is it what fans have been looking for? We also get into an interesting console mods related announcement by Bethesda and its peculiar timing. Furthermore, Starfield is now mixed on Steam and Skyrim has more players on Steam. What does all of this mean? Well, that’s what I’m here to do, so let’s pull it all together and chat about the latest in Starfield.

Retro Rebound: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ7H0l_I1gPOGsz0bU_V1MQ
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mrmattyplays
Twitter: https://twitter.com/G27Status
Instagram: http://instagram.com/mrmattyplays_official

#Xbox #Starfield #Bethesda

source

38 thoughts on “Starfield Just Got Its Biggest Update Yet… – Is It Enough?”

  1. Hello. You think the alleged 250 people working on Starfield are working on patches or improvements? Many of which fans without a dev bible or tools released within, in some cases, hours? No. They're working on ways to get more money. If, in the process of doing so, issues or QOL features are addressed, all the better. They can sell it. Hope about releasing content already within the game? Awesome! C'mon. Apologists are just the worst.

    Reply
  2. The foundation you're speculating on should have been wholly planned out prior to development and laid out. Oh, you know, like the skill trees, challenges and achievements – and so many other elements – that seem tacked on at the last second as the game was being rolled out the door. It's inexcusable.

    Reply
  3. I just wish I could run the game at a stable 60fps on pc. Even with dlss it constantly stutters and drops frames. I sadly had to uninstall and I’ll come back to it if they eventually address the major issues.

    Reply
  4. The people voting "for Starfield and getting a "mixed" result are just a bunch of entitled kids.
    Bethesda showed us what the had before the game launched and all the YT kiddies hyped the game to the moon ( no pun intended ).
    Bethesda themselves never kid.

    Reply
  5. I think when they are very reluctant to give us an actual fallout or elder scrolls sequel and choose to do something completely different, it doesn’t sit too well anyway. But they kinda built this 8 year long pressure and didn’t hit the mark it feels like it hits harder. I certainly fell for the Todd Howard salesman pitch from that long trailer. But I think mixed is very fair. While it does some good stuff, like the UC vanguard terramorph quest, it sure has a lot of big misses. It feels like one guy’s passion project with a triple A budget, it doesn’t feel like a cohesive experience like the past Bethesda games to me.

    Reply
  6. Still waiting on the update for series x that fixes the damn crashing that I get almost every hour. I'm pretty sure it has to do with the the game saving. It runs fine on my PC oddly enough. But for the 1% of us on series x with this issue, it sucks man. I just want to play it on my couch.

    Reply
  7. Most of the points you lay out about Starfield's improvements are all true and valid. I think the issue is there's too much randomly generated content, too much breadth not enough depth. Also for the things improved, colony building is definitely not improved over settlement building, quite the opposite. Much of it though is people just expecting more, especially with what other companies like Larian and CdProject red are out there doing. Who knows yet what Starfield might be like after a few expansions and patches though. Maybe like Cyberpunk it will improve with time.

    Reply
  8. I’m playing this on a digital Xbox xs and it constantly crashes and sometimes I can’t use the workstation to craft items. I like the game because I don’t play Xbox at all so it’s different to me but it does need some fixes.

    Reply
  9. Bethesda – get us a fuc..g vehicle of some sort to traverse the land.. don’t sell your updates for shit that should’ve been there in the first place. It’s a fact the game was released half baked.

    Reply
  10. We'll see if the first big update (not this small update lmao) and Expansion next year will fix the game's problem and make a bunch of improvements that people want. The game has potential to improve, but it will be up to Bethesda if they want to put the effort into it.

    Reply
  11. I’m so freaking sick of your coverage of this game. There are so many problems with this game from the ground up and you just breeze over them and say that a mixed review is really harsh. I know you want to stay in Bethesda’s good graces so you continue to get early copies and such things but it’s embarrassing. Do better. Btw this is coming from someone who shilled out 350 dollars for the collectors edition so don’t try to call me a Bethesda hater or PS5 fanboy

    Reply
  12. I feel like a big reason Skyrim has such a crazy mod scene is because of the love people have for the game. Even without mods people dump their lives into it and still come back to it. I dont think Starfield has the love or passion and it will need massive overhauls from Bethesda to make it that way.

    Reply
  13. What I don’t get is, if Bethesda made only the areas that are relevant and dropped procedural generation. The game would be so much smaller but everyone wouldn’t be all bitchy about it. This happens too much, nice to have features get added to games and then get hated because they’re not “fully fledged” when it was never the center focus. They never made it to entice people to explore the entire universe, they made it to make it feel real. I’m not a fan of the game, but this is far from the reason…. So long as social media exists, people will complain.

    Reply
  14. Like Outer Worlds, no one was expecting a tumultuous, hundreds-hour long story with an infinite amount of things to do. Obsidian didn't pitch it like that which is why it was met with high praises after launch. Sure, people were saying it was a little short but still a fantastic game. But Starfield was sold as a huge exploration sandbox game where you can literally be whoever you want to be… that's literally what Todd said. Obviously that's not the game that was shipped. So yea, if BGS was honest about exactly what Starfield was, a humble story with minor exploration elements, then the reviews wouldn't be mixed, and might even be dare I say "very positive" on Steam. The community just feels lied to and taken advantage of. All we can do is wait and hope it gets the No Man's Sky treatment.

    Reply

Leave a Comment