South African Reacts To Could US Military Conquer UK?



Buy me a Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jonograhamp
Patreon: patreon.com/JonoGrahamReacts
Paypal Me: paypal.me/jonograham57
Kit that I use
Mic: https://amzn.to/3J3t8TV
Camera: https://amzn.to/3kJuppD
Back up Camera: https://amzn.to/3ENQzhj
Please note that these are affiliate links and I will earn a small commission at no extra cost to you, this helps the channel and myself out to hopefully get better equipment etc.

Email your Reaction Suggestions here; [email protected]

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTsiibNiPGg&list=PPSV

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS

source

26 thoughts on “South African Reacts To Could US Military Conquer UK?”

  1. I work in a machine shop that makes parts for military aircraft and weapons. Parts are made daily for the 22 yrs I've worked there so equipment could be replaced fairly quickly

    Reply
  2. Ukraine is proof that while numbers might be nice (for the russians), they aren't the end-all, be-all of a military. the training, will-to-fight, and tenaciousness count for a hell of a lot. and for these reasons, i hope there is never a UK-USA war. while we the USA may win, it would be a Pyrrhic victory and the USA would be limping, bloodied to the winner's circle, meaning that the damage we took just wouldn't be worth it. frankly, i am very glad we have the UK as a steadfast ally/brother and would never want it to be otherwise.

    Reply
  3. "American industrial production, already the world's largest, doubled in size in four years. In the three years following the Battle of Midway, the Japanese built six aircraft carriers, while the US built 17. The US produced 33% more tanks and self-propelled guns than the entire Axis, six times as many trucks, two and half times total artillery, and twice as many machine guns. By the end of the war, America produced around 300,000 planes. The war was won as much by machine shops as by machine guns."

    Reply
  4. The likelihood of something like this ever happening are absurd. The only scenario I could ever envision would be to liberate a previously invaded Britain from an occupying force. Britain and the US are way too closely aligned on so many things that the mere idea of the US at war with the UK would send America into war within itself. It would be akin to beating up on your own family. The UK gave birth to the US. It’s the mother country. It’s not going to happen.

    Reply
  5. 11 aircraft carriers and that's not including the US amphibious assault ships. US air force is the largest in the world and US navy has the 2nd largest air force. Plus the aircrafts that can be brought back into service from the boneyard. We used to have a massive ghost fleet. RIMPAC 2023 was huge.

    Reply
  6. Yeah, the US has recently remedied it's lack of a modern anti-ship missiles with the LRASM. It's stealthy cruise missile that can be launched from ships, subs, or, aircraft, and, can strike ships, or, land targets. It can even be used in the "Rapid Dragon" system. Cargo aircraft carry pallets of AGM-158 missiles, drop them off their rear ramp, the missiles then deploy, and, can swarm their targets from multiple directions. a C-17 can carry up to 64 missiles.

    Reply
  7. The channel "Mark Felton Productions" has a great video called Britain's Shrinking Military – From Cold War Colossus to Cash-strapped Shadow. I would recommend, it goes over the real size of the British military

    Reply
  8. each carrier has 70 planes each, there are 11 carriers, carriers are nuclear fueled and thus you are looking a huge time of deployment without the need to return for any reason except damage. All other needs can be delivered and resupply the carrier by other ships. Considering that no other countries are allowed to assist either side in this scenario, I am thinking that the U.S would have no worries about having enough offense available. Especially when carriers each travel with battleships, submarines and other naval ships on their flanks. not to mention the range of even non nuclear ICBMs could be sent ahead from us soil. As for aircraft, through all branches of the military there are close to 18,000 aircraft I am unsure of the estimate of current armed drones.

    Reply
  9. If the American military hand both hands untied, no ROE, and could focus on pure war….God help any country that power is focused at. Just our Navy, has the power to destroy entire nations several times over. The UK would be completely crippled before they even realize what's going on…and their air would be dominated by F-22's.

    Reply
  10. The Army is not the Royal Army, just the Army, When was the last time the USA won a war? the biggest disadvantage for the Americans is that They are Americans. Watch when the Royal Airforce nuke the White House twice.

    Reply

Leave a Comment