Is the Meghan Markle Archetypes podcast a response to the bullying claims? | Palace Confidential



The topics chosen by the Duchess of Sussex for her Archetypes podcast have a surprising habit of overlapping with issues she has faced in her real life, that’s the view of the Daily Mail’s Diary Editor Richard Eden. ‘The whole premise of her series for Archewell is Archetypes which is meant to be about words and looking at their impact on women and this sort of thing,’ he tells Palace Confidential. ‘But by funny coincidence, every week seems to be about criticisms that have been made in the past about Meghan.’

Sign up to Richard Eden’s newsletter here: https://bit.ly/3sdBOO6

0:00 Coming up on Palace Confidential
0:40 Reaction to eggs being thrown at King Charles III!
2:24 Could this have ever happened to the Queen?
4:23 Prince Andrew ‘in tears’: Discussing Kate’s front-page story over the military uniform row
6:12 A new development in the Prince Andrew – Virginia Guiffre story
9:14 Could Prince Andrew have done more to ‘rehabilitate’ his public image
10:32 Would Prince Andrew ever go down the commercial route like Prince Harry?
11:59 What do you, Palace Confidential viewers, think about the latest Royal news?
13:07 Where did Netflix’s The Crown go wrong? Robert Hardman explains
16:05 Will the Royals EVER comment on The Crown?
17:04 Prince Harry ‘wanted to raise his children in Africa’? – Richard’s fascinating story in Eden Confidential
19:32 Is moving to Hollywood really moving out of the limelight for Prince Harry?
20:25 Richard reacts to the new Meghan Markle podcast Archetypes
22:14 The best questions from you, our Palace Confidential viewers! (Did yours get chosen?)

#palaceconfidential #meghanmarkle #podcast #dailymailroyals #royals #dailymail #princeharry #kingcharles

Sign up to Richard Eden’s newsletter here: https://bit.ly/3sdBOO6

source

43 thoughts on “Is the Meghan Markle Archetypes podcast a response to the bullying claims? | Palace Confidential”

  1. You can bet she has an agenda for all her podcast. It is trying to change her image and put her narratives out there. Her guests are all happy to be Markled. She is just using them for virtue signaling and telling people what a 'wonderful'person she is. We know u Meghan, we see through u.

    Reply
  2. Meghan and Harry seem to be at polar opposites of each other. What seems incomprehensible is that Harry just complies, and gives in to being marketed and pimped by his wife – it just makes no sense, whether Harry just has no fight left in him, or whether it's because he is so 'institutionalised', or just totally 'burnt out', strangely conflicting that he fights against it in public, but remains stuck in Meghans 'annexation', she preyed, stalked and conquered an easy win for his titles, and his status. The success immediately gave her a letterhead, a platform and power – heaven knows what his children will make of their brow beaten dad – and their mothers campaining for womens empowerment – while the Harkles grab sickly headlines and awards through Markles marketing campaigns – it's pretty disgusting, fake, sickening BS – Markle posing in some getout, with meaningless wordsalad, and markle is in heaven as the cash rolls in – just yuk

    Reply
  3. The studio has gone very LOW budget!! The wood on the walls are all chewed up and scratched!! The carpet is manky and comes no where close to going with that awful and uncomfortable furniture! 🤔🫣

    Reply
  4. These Royal channels wouldn't exist if it weren't for Meghan and Harry.
    Andrew will never be heard from again. Fergie too. Their kids are well behaved so not much news there unless they have more babies.
    Ditto Princess Ann and her offspring.
    Ditto Prince Edward.
    Ditto William and Catherine.
    That leaves King Charles who's prone to the odd gaffe.
    And Meghan and Harry.

    Reply
  5. Who should we believe? You & Andrew or our lying eyes? We've all seen the pictures, his ridiculous interview ("I don't sweat") & we all know he's guilty. No matter how much you & they scream innocence we all KNOW the truth!

    Reply
  6. No Andrew should have been able to have his day in court and be heard. His accuser is a known liar and trafficker. He settled and what you people in the MEDIA need to understand is that he did it for his mother so that she could have a good jubilee. He fell on his sword so to speak and all you people in the media keep saying how much he settled for and that he did it because he didn't want to go to court. The only thing Andrew is really at fault for is his bad choices in "FRIENDS".

    Reply
  7. Unfortunately, there are a lot of things that the Crown gets right that the Royals do not like but are true. For example, the episode about the Tsar and his family's demise because their relatives refused to go and get. I could imagine Prince Phillip saying what he did. They did not have to be settled in the UK and could have gone elsewhere in the British Empire. Charles and Camilla and their adulterous long time affair. How can he be the head of the Anglican Church without making a very public confession? Also, perhaps he and the Royal family needs to actually know the words to the hymns that are sung. Most appear not to know the words. How offensive do you think that military veterans and those currently serving find Anne and Edward wearing military uniforms because they have never served? Queen Elizabeth comes across as uncaring and without feeling.

    Reply
  8. You all just need to know that in South Africa rich and poor alike no matter the race, many encourage children being barefoot. Their is a reputable Afrikaans junior school which services a very upper middle class community encourages a no school show policy which I love. It does not imply any kind of stereotypical poor African child.

    Reply
  9. It's the only way she can address Tom bowers book and valentines as she can't sue as she knows it's true .I do not condone Andrew for associating himself with epstein but I think what guffrie said it was mostly lies and it was provable allegedly he should have put up a fight he was guilty by association.

    Reply
  10. Agreed about the expression of "running around barefoot with African children" to be rather patronizing. Reminded me of when Meghan sat on the floor while meeting well-to-do mothers in South Africa.

    Reply

Leave a Comment