EPIC ID REFUSAL

by



A man does not relent and stands his ground against cops with a lot of questions.

This video comes from Good guy Audits channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/GoodguyAudits
The original video is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fkk-fEIRVk0&t=0s
If you like his video please go to his channel and consider subscribing.

The gear I use:
Camera Bag https://amzn.to/2R8C3LG
LG 360 CAM LG-R105 https://amzn.to/3jrr3mt
Casio Exilim EX-FH20 9.1MP Digital Camera https://amzn.to/3zHRbAh
Cheap Chinese 4K Camcorder https://amzn.to/2R1cvzQ
Samsung Galaxy S8 https://amzn.to/3us9yWV
Samsung galaxy A8 https://amzn.to/3fM5goS
Iphone 7 https://amzn.to/3wBievo
Hakeye Firefly Action Camera https://amzn.to/3fwPjTH
Firefly Batteries and Charger https://amzn.to/3fu3QiO
Hohem iSTEADY Pro 3 https://amzn.to/2R1ZyWy — https://youtu.be/Z0oTm5qJfXk
Hohem iSteady Mobile + https://amzn.to/3Cx8DK4
Battery Power Bank https://amzn.to/3i29avJ — https://youtu.be/DiFhMrjnenA
Motorized Pan Tilt Tripod Mount https://amzn.to/3vBZvzG
LED Ring Light https://amzn.to/3vWU4ev — https://youtu.be/M1Ep90FqbpM
Suspension Boom Scissor Arm https://amzn.to/3uwiwlX

source

24 thoughts on “EPIC ID REFUSAL”

  5. Police is a different gang, they're acting like dangerous gang members.
    They're thinking, they own the entire city, they think they can do whatever they want, just because they're using an firearm and wearing and uniform. They're a unique gang with uniform. Very disappointed!

    Reply

  6. Officer Lou Costello never stopped for three seconds to listen to what Good Guy was saying. He’s one of these people that think you can win an argument by sheer volume of words.

    Reply

  8. This kind of interaction should be illegal. These cowards are obviously under worked and definitely over paid. This guy did great in the face of perceived authority and narcissistic pigs.

    Reply

  14. We have zero obligation to answer their questions……

    NO OBLIGATION to identify unless lawfully arrested, Brown v Texas, 4th and 5th and state law.

    AND IF LAWFULLY ARRESTED, the RIGHT to REMAIN SILENT INVOKES…..

    NO OBLIGATION to answer questions per:

    Watts v. Indiana, 338 U.S. 49 (1949), was a United States Supreme Court case in which Justice Robert Jackson famously opined, "To bring in a lawyer means a real peril to solution of the crime because, under our adversary system, he deems that his sole duty is to protect his client—guilty or innocent—and that, in such a capacity, he owes no duty whatever to help society solve its crime problem. Under this conception of criminal procedure, any lawyer worth his salt will tell the suspect in no uncertain terms to make no statement to police under any circumstances."

    In this case, a defendant was subjected to rigorous interrogation methods, including being forced to sleep on the floor, resulting in a confession to having committed murder. The Supreme Court ruled that the confession was involuntary and reversed his conviction.

    Terry v Ohio 392 U.S. 1

    "Of course, the person stopped is not obliged to answer, answers may not be compelled and refusal to answer furnishes no basis for an arrest, although it may alert the officer to the need for continued observation."

    “The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that refusal to answer law enforcement questions cannot form the basis of reasonable suspicion. See Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429, 437, 111 S. Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991) ("We have consistently held that a refusal to cooperate, without more, does not furnish the minimal level of objective justification needed for a detention or seizure.") – U.S. v. Santos 403 F.3d 1120 (2005).

    Another gaslighting, tail chasing, peace breaching, pos lying scumbag traitor with a badge…..and the pos has no clue what ras even is.
    If you do not stop breaching my peace and your oath and duty, my name will be plaintiff…..
    I see your suspicious behavior…..breaching my peace without cause…..

    Reply

Leave a Comment