Disruptive Liberal MPs come to the rescue of witness dodging Tories' questions on redacting docs



Liberal members Iqra Khalid and Francis Drouin constantly disrupt Conservative member Kelly McCauley’s questioning Privy Council Office official on redacting documents ordered by the House of Commons.

source

30 thoughts on “Disruptive Liberal MPs come to the rescue of witness dodging Tories' questions on redacting docs”

  1. this guy just swore in a committee meeting man. There is no more decorum. The people talking the loudest about everything being done to them are the ones doing thee exact thing they are accusing others of doing. We are going t obliterate the liberals they will not even get official party status. They talk in a condescending way and they are hypocrites beyond what i have ever seen. Liberals have made it so so simple. Before I tried to navigate all their bullshit now i affirm my beliefs and make them known and liberals just leave my cirlcle because I can debate/; abortion, leaving the house hold, giving up all of their responsibilities to take on mens responsibilities because they can and now they are ruining the world. Im not sexist because we have great women in conservative party. All liberal women are mean girls or covert narcissist's

    Reply
  2. drouin bragging he’s been in the committee for 9 years yet he doesn’t know how to properly call a point of order😂. What a clown! i am choked every time this guy talks. male version of khalid for sure!

    Reply
  3. time belongs to the member, not the witness, member is completely within their right to reclaim their time and stop the witness from speaking

    Khalid has some nerve to lecture about decorum when the other guy was swearing. He should have been removed immediately for throwing a tantrum.

    Reply
  4. Non of this means anything sadly. As soon as liberals are out, its not like thw conservatives are going to pursue this to the point of criminal charges. We all know it. Thats why this is happening, and why the liberals are doing it, and why they will continue to do so……this is just a show.

    Reply
  5. OK I change my mind for those Nikola point of order for no effing reason will be a $5000 fine why because they’re holding things up and that 5000 will come out of their bank account that should put a stop to this stupidity well better yet let’s just have an election and once we get the good old blue team in there to straighten this crap out

    Reply
  6. Wow look at her fidgeting can anybody tell that she’s lying like a rug do you know why she knows she’s gonna be looking for a new job and who the hell would hire her she knows she’s about to become homeless

    Reply
  7. How much money are we overpaying this government person because I don’t think she’s worth the money she’s getting in fact I was just about bet she’s getting $150,000 more than what she’s worth but that’s just my guess

    Reply
  8. The chair's comment is correct, "the government is not a person". Therefore the government does not recieve constitutional protection under the Privacy and Freedom of Information act. The government(not the people in it) is nothing more than an office space.

    Reply

Leave a Comment