Daily Mail Exposed: Inside Their Royal Family Hatred & More

by



HG Tudor: https://youtu.be/XWVT81EsMAc?si=wqaPUxydMuhmRJIg
Video Poverty Porn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hZ2zwTC6KE
Alcohol/coffee fund: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=VK3UQLKD8QX6Q
Finn’s Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv92FEqh62unGWkF9oC9omg
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=71502380&fan_landing=true&view_as=public
Daddy’s Book: https://a.co/d/5CqZ1xX
Twitter Name: Longsally aka Sue Smith
Gettr Name; Longsally
Rumble Name: https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all
Email: [email protected]
Amazon Wish List: https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/3VRH3G7EB0R35?ref_=wl_share

Sue Smith
655 H Fairview Rd
PMB # 103
Simpsonville, SC 29680

#godsavetheking #kingcharles #queenncamilla #meghanmarkle #princeharry #liars #grifters #fakers #bully #poloflop #notintop10 #dailymail #dailymailhatestheroyals #sarahferguson #zaratindall #hon #livingapart #separatelives #separated #productplacement

source

33 thoughts on “Daily Mail Exposed: Inside Their Royal Family Hatred & More”

  3. It seems like the DM is suggesting that these people aren’t entitled to earn a living by accident of birth. I wonder how they are supposed to keep a roof over their head and put food on the table? Maybe DM thinks they should be claiming Universal Credit so that it can give them a kicking for claiming benefits as well? Make your mind up! I reckon DM are running scared now because the Pest Prince is still litigating against them. Richard Eden has gone right down in my estimation. He;s nothing more than a puppet spouting DM propaganda.

    Reply

  4. Why doesnt the Daily rag mention Meghans Sussex squad and their threats to members of the Royal family, or her mothers grubby past. No, just regurgitating the same repugnant and false accusations the two half-wits PR put out everyday.
    The owner of this rag obviously doesn't oversee the trash the publish..wouldn't wrap peelings in it.

    Reply

  14. Whether you agree with what they are saying or not isn't the issue, the issue is that the UK HAS A FREE MEDIA ABLE TO SAY THESE THINGS WITHOUT BEING CENSORED. What individual people think about this doesn't matter, what matters is that THEY ARE ALLOWED TO SAY IT and they can say it because of THE FREE MEDIA. Compare that to media in another country who REPORTED THE TRUTH and were sued for that, the difference is the UK has FREE UNCENSORED MEDIA and the other country increasingly doesn't. Plus Rebecca English works for the DM and is staunchly PRO ROYAL, they [different reporters] are allowed to have differing viewpoints and if they all reported nothing but sugary sweet pro royal information – and all this information is in the public domain so it isn't as though it's something new or unusual – then they would rightly be criticised for that as well. Just be grateful they are ALLOWED to print this and that they aren't only allowed to print articles that favour everyone [you know, like the Earl of Spencer thinks they should be forced to do, he is certainly – in his own words – all in favour of censorship along with his nephew Harry] this article proves that this ISN'T THE CASE and that censorship, so far, isn't an issue in the UK.

    Reply

  15. The daily mail online allows the Sussex squad to attack Catherine and William and their children and the other family members in any royal article and regularly published articles through the 'where's kate' campaign that were only printed to encourage clickbait reaction.

    Reply

  16. Attacks on the Royal family about the Duchy finance by the Sussex squad are hypocrisy because Harry was funded by his father through the same Duchy for 35 years of his life and a year after in Canada till he complained his daddy cut him off. 95% of the Sussexes funding came from the Duchy including Meghan's very expensive wardrobe despite it being said she was already a 'millionaire', a strong independent woman and a feminist. That didn't extend to funding her own clothing then and expenses.

    Reply

  17. Randy Andy (as he was known before Fergie) has never been a good judge of character. He has always followed his, oh how did Hasbeen phrase it? His todger, that's right. Andy has always followed his todger to any pasture that would open a gate for him. I'm surprised they haven't dredged up the photo of a topless Koo Stark to embarass him again with that whole mess.

    Reply

  19. Daily Mail appear to be a Harry and Meghan supporter. They appear to want to take down the real Royals if they can. I don’t buy their paper anymore. I wonder how many others have stop buying it.

    Reply

  24. Sue, as Harry is continually blaming the paps for his mothers death, maybe his "Mission" should be campaigning for the right to NOT use seatbelts. The right to speed through the centre of a major city and the right to drive while 4x the legal alcohol limit and high on cocaine. Worthy causes Haz? But, then again, no accountability.

    Reply

  25. I recently made a comment about being traumatised from being photographed in 2004. It was sarcasm. We do that in the UK. The absolutely ridiculous suggestion that a sane person needs protection from photographers is just crazy. Harry should ask his wife who actually pays to be photographed.

    Reply

  26. The Harkles never make a mistake😅😅no of course, they just lies, no respect for anyone, making false statements, and we can go on. They know everything, they are above the law etc. Sara and her brother don’t have titles, not working royals, just a working and mother of 3 and is working as everybody. I don’t feed the Daily Mail anymore and will tell all my friends to do the seem. Sue you are spot on with everything, I agree absolutely with you. Hope you had marvellous Christmas days. Love your video’s

    Reply

  29. Lady C concurs, the Daily Mail is another Celebrity Rag, WE more or less already know this stuff — The Daily Mail would be trusted — if they told the WORLD all about the Couple in Montecito, and their alleged "children" — no one ever sees, open up THAT NEWS !!! Daily Mail.

    Reply

Leave a Comment