Coaching Andrea Botez Is a NIGHTMARE



Woman Grandmaster Dina Belenkaya tries to give a chess lesson to Andrea Botez. Well, by the title, you can guess things did not go as planned. 😆

0:00 Intro
0:15 Lesson

Drop a like and let us know your thoughts in the comments!

⭐️Watch me LIVE: https://www.twitch.tv/dinabelenkaya

❤️Social Media:
➡️Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dinabelenkaya/
➡️Twitter: https://twitter.com/DinaBelenkaya
➡️Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@dinabelenkaya

♟ Chess Links
➡️ Improve your chess – https://go.chess.com/DinaBelenkaya
Support the channel ► https://streamelements.com/dinabelenkaya/tip
✉️ For all business inquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Thanks for watching!

#DinaBelenkaya #botez #Chess #Grandmaster

source

35 thoughts on “Coaching Andrea Botez Is a NIGHTMARE”

  1. I know Andrea is hyperactive and ignorant, but the coaching here is also pretty trash. Correcting terminology that was used correctly more than once and antagonizing the student are two major red flags. Frame the video around Andrea if that's easier to you, but maybe Naroditsky and Hammer could coach you on coaching before you try this again.

    Reply
  2. Ummm…Am I wrong?…An isolated pawn is one with no like pawns on either adjacent like file whether it can move forward or not…She was referencing a backward pawn, correct?

    Reply
  3. Yes, Andrea comes off a hyperactive, distracted, and perhaps ignorant. Truth be told, she is a strong chess player already … so most of us would come off even worse. Terminolgy is important, because at her 1900 level there must be a nomenclature (jargon) to make communication efficient, so that abstract thoughts are avoided and clarity of instruction can happen. Without it, each lesson would revert to a PHd student trying to learn with the vocabulary of a kindergartener. As such, I will return for these lessons as I find them helpful and relatable ….regardless of the frustration … in fact, it is the emotion that helps to anchor the lesson.

    Reply
  4. 6:32 Andrea 0.5 : Dina 0 a "hanging pawns" structure is actually 2 connected pawns. Nothing to do with being under attack. The hanging pawns are usually closer to the middle of the board (can't be at the edge like in this case), but Andrea was closer to the truth than Dina.

    Reply
  5. она не понимает, что такое рыцарь. неактивный слон – самая большая слабость. слишком незрелый

    Reply
  6. I think you got it wrong. According to wikipedia, an isolated pawn is a pawn that has no friendly pawn on an adjacent file. That is all. It doesnt say "isolated pawn is the one that is on the open file and it cannot move forward because there is opponent pawn", whatever that means. 🤔

    Reply
  7. Andrea has a lot of sympathy for isolated pawns because she realizes how hard it is when your sister goes off to college and leaves you with nobody to play with! That someone might choose that situation voluntarily is not something she wants to think about.

    Reply
  8. I don’t think Andrea is gonna want to marry Dina anymore. That’s how it often goes with these love affairs. Sometimes it’s best to bring in an unattached person to do the teaching. Sparrow should just stick to seducing chess community kingpins.

    Reply
  9. This was the 25th game of the 1927 championship match between Capablanca and Alekhine. The move actually played by Alekhine was Bg4, and Dina gives a nice explanation of the ideas in the position. Capablanca then maneuvered his knight to c5, and an interesting nuance is that Alekhine played the not-so-obvious move Rc7 both to protect the pawn on b7 and also so that after the trade of bishops on g6 Black's queen is not stuck defending both the knight on d7 and the pawn on g6.

    Dina is an excellent teacher, and this was a great choice of a game to analyze. Alekhine, at the time leading by two games in the match, managed to draw this game en route to winning the world championship.

    Reply
  10. Отличный контент, видно что ты стараешься и умеешь это делать. Молодец )

    Также совет и пища для размышления: если бы ты позвала в видео ещё одного хоть кого, то контента стало ещё больше на 1/3.

    Reply

Leave a Comment