01/02/2025 PT1 “2.0 WUTHERING WAVES DAY | LARGE STREAM | MEGA CONTENT | DRAMA GAMING REACTING NEWS”



VOD from : twitch.tv/tectone
*NOT ASSOCIATED WITH TECTONE*
Fan made channel to save Tectone VODs

—=== SOCIALS ===—
DISCORD discord.gg/tectone
TWITTER twitter.com/Tectone
REDDIT reddit.com/r/TecTown

source

24 thoughts on “01/02/2025 PT1 “2.0 WUTHERING WAVES DAY | LARGE STREAM | MEGA CONTENT | DRAMA GAMING REACTING NEWS””

  1. Lmao this guy is just getting views for going against tec just like what plazokas . Hope tec doesn’t give him any more limelight because plazokas faded away after he ignored all his content

    Reply
  2. The guy came into the call, got schooled multiple times, played victim about 3 or 4 times for multiple reasons and still came out saying he "won".

    The end was pretty funny tho, reminded me of Rorschach saying "I'm not locked in here with you, you're locked in here with me!"

    Reply
  3. "Rexlent is a sweat." could never be fact.
    "Most people considered rexlent is a sweat." could be fact.
    "Most people considered Rexlent is sweatier than most people." could be fact.

    When making a judgement of this kind, most people would "compare" the subject with a default standard/situation in their mind.

    If you were covered by shxt. Most people would considered you were dirty.
    If someone was coverd by more shxt. Most people would stiil considered you were dirty, even the one covered by more shxt.
    But, "You're clean, compare to the someone." is also true. People can only disagree, due to their standard.

    Adjective about comparison could not be absolute fact. (big, long, quick, etc.)

    Gateoo provoke Tectone to call him.
    Gateoo didn't want to talk to Tectone after Tectone hung up.
    These two sentences could both be true.
    Then who started this?

    The person who provoking would usually seem as the starter, that is Gateoo.
    Tectone just decide not to stop, but continue.

    Gateoo didn't want this, but he started this.

    (as for A provoke B, then B hit A.
    it's on B, not because of B is the one started the conflict.
    It's because B hit A.
    Who started the conflict is not the point.
    if it is, then it's on A.
    A provoke B, so A deserve the hit.)

    Reply

Leave a Comment