‘You don’t SHAME family!’ From Prince Harry’s Spare to Coronation: 2023 Review | Palace Confidential



It’s been another unforgettable year in the lives of the Royal Family. From the soaring highs of the Coronation to the crashing lows of the revelations in Prince Harry’s memoirs Spare, 2023 has provided some fascinating and uncomfortable moments. Following all the big stories has been our unmissable weekly royal talk show Palace Confidential, in this special episode of the programme the Daily Mail’s Royal Editor Rebecca English and the paper’s Diary Editor look back at some of the biggest talking points.

0:00 A look back on a rollercoaster 2023 for Royals
1:08 Start with a high! A look back on King Charles’s coronation
5:54 ‘Slunk in!’ But we can’t forget the Prince Harry and Meghan Markle invitation saga…after Spare
10:15 2023 Montage Part 1
11:40 From Spare to… Richard and Rebecca react to the worst Royal moments of 2023
13:55 Richard still believes Prince Harry is out to ‘destroy the monarchy’
17:35 Is there anything useful for historians in Prince Harry’s Spare?
18:37 What did Prince Harry hope to achieve with Spare?
22:00 Richard is still furious about Prince Harry being a Counsellor of State
23:30 ‘Backfired spectacularly!’ Has Omid Scobie’s Endgame set back any hopes of rapprochement?
27:45 What is the situation with Prince Andrew?
30:15 Prince William’s reaction to seeing Rebecca holding frozen spinach on her foot
32:26 It’s Montage Time Part 2!

#princeharry #palaceconfidential #royals #kingcharles #princewilliam #katemiddleton

source

45 thoughts on “‘You don’t SHAME family!’ From Prince Harry’s Spare to Coronation: 2023 Review | Palace Confidential”

  1. Jo I don’t understand why u had the Harkles in the photos . WE don’t like them WE don’t want to see them in the mix with the REAL Royals . The Harkles r not Royalty u being a British citizen should know this . I’ll stop watching if u keep showing them with the Royals

    Reply
  2. In current psychological thought it is quite acceptable for Harry to have asked for a conversation if not an apology. All things being equal. But of course … things are Not equal … which is the first requirement for a discussion. Also just a quick point about them wanting to keep a connection to the royals – did anyone ever think that perhaps its it family. He Is royal. Maybe no cynicism needed. Just family.

    Reply
  3. Sadly I think that just like he said…they got panicked about money. All movements and actions since they left are 100%motivated by graving so much money they could. Cruelly de Vil needed money to belong to the A list in L.A. 😮

    Reply
  4. Happy New Year's to you all! In 2024 lets stay strictly to Royals and little to none of the insulting brand better known as H&M sad, sad, sad. Their actions over the years makes me cringe! It's a shame that the county I was born in is represented by such an unprofessional and disgraceful couple. XOXO

    Reply
  5. I love the montages but they go by too quickly. It sometimes takes me a while to recognize the photo subjects and occasion before the photo changes. I will try re-running the montages at a slower speed than the rest of the broadcast to see if that helps. I am also surprised that these segments are always referred to as the "royal" montages yet they include photos of Harry and Meghan. I'd rather see more of Princess Anne, the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh, and perhaps Zara and Mike and their family. Otherwise I love the show. Thank you.

    Reply
  6. There's been no evidence to support that the Sussex's had anything to do with Omid Scobie's book. Or that they gave permission to the names, or that he even had the correct names. And with all due respect to Richard Eden, from a mixed marriage myself, I don't believe you have a real sense of what Feels racist and what does not when you enter into a family who is a totally different shade from yourself. Im right with Harry here. When your eyes have been openend. The world is a very different place …

    Reply
  7. Dissapointed at the inclusion of so many pics of H&M, one of them both would have been more than enough. No more please or you will lose this subscriber, they are not members of UK RF any more.

    Reply
  8. Agree with some commenters. Please only refer to Harry and Meghan if they do something notable. There are many other excellent hard working members of the Royal Family who rarely, if ever get a mention on this show – Princess Anne, Prince Edward, the Duchess of Edinburgh, Lady Louise etc. Otherwise you are inflating the importance of the Montecito moaners way beyond what they deserve.

    Reply
  9. You all scrutinize Harry and Meghan. Please recall that Charles coronation took place on Prince Archie's birthday. Harry had a commitment and duty to attend his son's birthday party. How crude of you reporters to brush that detail aside as if Harry chose to dart in and out because of his book. He had to get back to spend a few hours of the day, celebrating His son's birthday, his special day.

    Reply
  10. As a spare of sorts (more of an attempt to save the trainwreck of a marriage) and albeit definitely not royalty, i can emphatically say Harry is acting completely normal in seeking love and acceptance any how, any way.
    Really sure his precious mum has turned over in her grave a few times over all this sheer stupidity.

    Reply
  11. I can’t wait 2024! Hope you all had a very merry Christmas and happy New Year’s!
    As for the video today, I love the three of you on the panel, Jo, Rebecca, Richard, you all do a wonderful job, and I feel like we get pretty accurate information. You do your best to be discreet, but still tell the story and I really appreciate that. No, I’m not from the UK I’m from the US, but the UK is on my bucket list I would love to come see Buckingham Palace just the country across the pond. It has always fascinated me. Yes, the love for the royal family or the knowledge of the royal family came back when Diana began to be corded by Charles, and then she became his wife, princess Diana, and then of course the tragedy of her death😢😢 she is still known as the princess of all of our hearts! I’m sad for Harry because of the choices he has made. But I am excited to see what Charles and Camilla will do along with one day. William and Catherine will be king and queen and their legacy has already started!
    I hope to see more than three of you in the next year, and I look forward to the stories and truths that you were going to report and I hope that the family that’s on this side of the pond will settle down and start living their lives, instead of trying to corrupt the ones they decided to leave behind !

    Reply
  12. Montage should have included the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh. The sterling work of our true working Royals needed highlighting and mentioning. Having the traitor at the beginning of each montage and then his wife peppered throught was unacceptable. Going forward I would prefer to see more detail of those in the family who support our wonderful King and Queen and the causes our monachy overall is known for. If you have to reference non working commercial members of the family, please contain it to a minimum, for example, one per cent. Happy Healthy New Year to all. xx

    Reply
  13. I saw The King. It was a wonderful documentary. It showed how close the Royal Family truly ate, and the information about the crowns was fascinating. It seems evident that while Harry and the media were playing the 'will he , won't he' game, the REAL ROYALS just got on with their lives. It seems that Harry is now just an irritating little fly that buzzes around looking for food. He seems to be of no significance. The media who he hates is keeping his image alive. If the media didn't speak about him for a mear two weeks, we would all happily forget about him.

    Reply
  14. Please respect the King's second son and his wife's request of privacy. Please do not show their pictures (I am surprised you decided to show him as the first pic for the montage)

    Reply
  15. I wrote a New Year's Resolution for you guys:
    "In 2024, we will no longer report on Harry and that woman… nor will we show their photographs or mention their names.
    They are no longer members of the British royal family, so there is no need to include them anymore in our program."
    (You're Welcome.)

    Reply
  16. Who are Harry and Meghan? Why are you even talking about the no-longer royals? In my opinion ( and I'm sure it carries a lot of weight lol) they should be persona non grata from this day forth. Talking about them or indeed referring to them in any manner whatsoever, merely keeps them in the public eye which is what they want. Don't add to their coffers!! Focus instead on the rest of the royal family who are going about their royal business, tending to their families and doing good deeds!

    Reply
  17. Understandably, Harry & wife are part of this discussion; however, going forward, I pray that all focus is on the 'genuine' Royals. That is to say, the real story is about the working RF and the other two are rightly and deservedly relegated to the footnotes of history.

    Reply
  18. Why do you include pictures of the lying grifters?? They quit, remember. I’m American and I can stand them for what they did to your lovely Queen and the RF. Just stop including them.

    Reply
  19. I stopped subscribing to your show because you never shut up about the disgusting Sussexes. I have watched this program, and you are still obsessed with them. Read the comments. Everyone is sick of your coverage of these two who are non royals.

    Reply

Leave a Comment