Would you survive a nuclear attack? Would you even want to?



With so many fallout shelters being built and with the demand getting very high, this seems to be on some of the peoples minds. Certainly it would not be an ideal world to live in and would actually be apocalyptic.

source

26 thoughts on “Would you survive a nuclear attack? Would you even want to?”

  1. It would depend upon where I was living and the type of nuclear attacks that took place. If the countries restricted themselves to air bursts, then the amount of fallout would be low.

    Reply
  2. Places that would be good to live would be:
    Switzerland.
    The out back in Australia or parts of New Zealand far away from major cities.
    Many of the Islands in the middle of the Atlantic, Indian, or Pacific oceans would be the best places, so long as there were no military bases.

    The problem with Antarctica is the need for supplies.

    Let's see what the author says.

    Reply
  3. Good evening to Gina and everyone, Gina since you did this video, for some unknown reason, we're Defcon 2 now, and over the state of Kentucky we have high flying bombers and other military planes in the air, and to answer the question of nuclear, I would personally want to go home to God and Jesus, I won't go into detail about after, because it would be of pure horror, so I pray if that moment comes, God would give us the Carrington event from the sun to shut it all down or take us home, My personal thoughts on the subject, all I can say is, give yourself to God and Jesus, for he will take care of the rest, love to Gina and everyone ๐Ÿค—โ™ฅ๏ธ๐Ÿ•ฏ๏ธ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐Ÿ™โœ๏ธ

    Reply
  4. Ive suffered long enough with multiple health issues. I cant see myself being able to survive the fallout. Im already extremely bothered physically by 5G radiation. Im done with this world as the Bible tells us to be. Praying for a pretrib rapture. Or that I go quickly. That may seem negative to some of you, but I'm really ready to leave here. Done with the extreme levels of evil and poisoning of humans and the earth.

    Reply
  5. I live in central Florida. They'll drive most of the state into the ocean. Target within 3 kilometers, I think. Some kind of detection. Tampa – centcom – 20 warheads for that. 80 miles away. Cape Kennedy 45 miles as the crow flies – 9 warheads. Jacksonville navy yard 20 warheads. Nope I don't think I'll make it here. Too many bases

    Reply
  6. ๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰โคโคโคโคโคโคโคโคโค๐Ÿ˜ฎ Gina soul ๐Ÿ˜ HAPPY DAY ๐Ÿž

    Reply
  7. Thanks for doing this videoโฃ I vote no, I wouldn't want to survive any nuclear blast. This world is in pretty rough shape in so many ways as it is I couldn't imagine living through what a nuclear blast would do, not to mention the farther away from such a thing, likely a slower more painful demise.

    Reply
  8. This Question Has No Merit If You've Ever See The Story of UFOs Stopping Accidental ๐Ÿ˜ฎNuclear Launches… I've Seen It and while people Keep sweating Over politicians who threaten it… Extraterrestrial Lineages Have Seeded and Sealed Our Appointed "Ascension from Fear." ๐Ÿชถ #FearNOT ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ

    Reply
  9. The reason New Zealand and Australia would be good places as they have few targets for nuclear attacks. They are far away from the main targets. So they would be relatively free from fallout.
    They are also in the Southern hemisphere and most of the targets are in the Northern hemisphere.

    CERN is in Switzerland.

    Reply

Leave a Comment