Worse Than I Thought: Su-57 “Felon” Remastered | Corrupted Intel Files



You know, I can roast this plane better than last time. Especially considering that I’m genuinely impressed by how bad it actually is upon closer study…

I am a Community Content Creator of Thee Adventurer’s Guild!

Join Thee Adventurer’s Guild here at https://theeadventurersguild.org/
and follow them on Twitter here at https://x.com/TheeAdventurers

Design Credits
– Character Emote Images: Sakurart
– Twitter: https://x.com/sakurart2020
– Logo: RoyalSeiros
– Twitter: https://x.com/RoyalSeiros

Socials
– Business Inquiries: [email protected]
– Twitter: https://x.com/SliceraxGaming
– Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/slicerax_gaming

#aircraft #military #vtuber #su57 #russia #russiaukrainewar #russian #f22 #f22raptor #history #engineering #aerospace #aerospaceengineering #f35

source

45 thoughts on “Worse Than I Thought: Su-57 “Felon” Remastered | Corrupted Intel Files”

  1. I still think Su-57 better than F-22. But both fighter jets were unnecessary to their air forces.
    Su-57 got external bays right. Imagine if F-22 built with same configuration expanding it's ground strike capabilities. But it's huge fail for F-22.
    Second thing is radar. Su-57 again got things right with it's auxilary radars unlike F-22 which has none. I will remind you that after missiles being launch fighter should track target with it's own radar until missile itself will be acquire target. When both fighters launch missiles both will have to deacrease altitude or conduct maneuvers in order to avoid missile. During maneuvers they will drop tracking the target since radar fixed in one position(except for Su-30 which has radar that rotates) and missile won't recieve any updates related to target. Unless fighter has side radar.
    Another flaw should be discussed is stealth. Massmedia describes F-22 radar crossection is equal to the size of baseball ball. However we know that F-22 has radar in it's nose covered by radiotransparent cap. So the radar's surface area much more bigger than baseball ball. Baseball ball is marketing technique to convince audience that F-22 has great stealth capabilities. F-117 is solid stealth jet and do not uses radar. Having radar in 'stealth' jet is mocking of logic.
    One more flaw related to the stealth is speed. The more speed you have – more dopler signals you return. If you look diagrams of radar crossections you will notice that it is harder to detect jet from behind despite back of it made with optimal shapes. Dopler effect will decrease stealth capabilities. In order to counter it jets should be slow, just like F-35.
    Another flaw is radio absorboing material. It will require extra maintanace so it will be very expensive to operate F-22. In fact there's flaw in F-22 model in the area infront of cockpit radioabsorbing material wears much more faster. If you google images of F-22 you will notice that area.
    Su-57 is unnecessary becuse Russia has Su-30 with rotating radars and much more cheaper than Su-57. Russia has very few fighters in fleet. Even chinese have more jets than russians. Air superiotry of Russia in Ukraine almost do not exist. Su-57 will sacrafice numerical advantage for Russia.

    Reply
  2. Waveforms they, reflect, deflect, and refract, and in sound it is both pressure and temperatue dependant.

    Those three together at once are what audio guys think about whilst you are watching some trick twerk at the club and thinking about items to do later… one get paid by the bar, the other pays the bar…. learn and do it right.

    Reply
  3. We’re also ignoring the F-35s DAS system, which is an IRST track that has detected ballistic missile launches from beyond visual range, the SU-57 would be lit the fuck up by an F-35 and have a missile coming it’s way before it even knows it’s in an engagement (the DAS system is sensitive enough to technically be able to lock a tank from its gun firing)

    Reply
  4. 13:40 I am sorry but did you just suggest that amraams MAR is 37nmi? how did you get to that number? is that if both jets are at 30,000ft?
    edit: in a dogfight (which I know are unrealistic today) I do believe that the su57 would have won over the f22, mainly because of its 3d thrust vectoring compared to the f22s 2d, and if you were in a dogfight you would definitely use afterburner, and su57s "laser system" might help against fox 2 missiles
    edit 2: I have no idea where you got the idea of f22 being able to supercruise at mach 1,8, sorry but thats just nonsense, su57 being able to supercruise at mach 1,3 is believable and I saw claims where the f22 could supercruise at mach 1,3-1,4 which is still better than su57 but very far from mach 1,8 supercruise
    edit 3: the maximum range of the su57 and f22 are pretty similar, but they are both design to carry out different missions, the f22 must get to the enemy across a ocean first and then operate from behind the borders the su57 has no interest striking anything that far, su57s range is enough to attack anything in europe and get back
    edit 4: using my own sources I have found that the f22 wet thrust is around 30,100×2 and not the suggested 31,970×2 which is not that big of a difference but I wanted to mention it

    Reply
  5. 11:18
    0.5-1 m² RCS? Where did you find that nonsense?
    The only thing ever reported is that Sukhoi tried to reach 0,1m² AVERAGE RCS. The F22 0.0001 RCS is not the average number its the peak number where the plane reaches that number in a certain angle with a certain loadout and speed as altitude AND distance to the radar.
    Which is that the F22 has a similiar AVERAGE RCS of 0.1m².

    13:14: the Aim120D with about 97 nmi is clearly beaten by the R37M which has a range of 340 nmi(lets say its overexegerated 1/3 of it still beats the aim120d)
    Only the Aim174 can match the R37M, unlike the Aim174 the R37m is combat proven and had intercepted Ukrainian Su27s and MiG29 on about absurd long ranges. So even here you are false and complettly bonkers..

    And i haven't even watched the entire video just two parts, so what is this video supposed to be? The LazerPig of Stealthfighters attempted Roast about something you clearly don't understand?

    seriously for jesus christ can you stop trying to be funny for your NAFO audience..

    Reply
  6. What I hear is the USSR was always playing catch up. Most of their planes were interceptors, designed to defend against US bombers. That is, the US was the aggressive attacker, and they were playing defence the whole time.

    Reply
  7. Some experts say that the reason its still not fully mass produced is cus of the delay of its intended engines, when the engines are complete they will replace the current ones in service and start mass production.
    2ndly, the units we see regularly and clearly are pure prototypes, so obvisously they have exposed screws, but some units have proper RAM and no exposed surface, and iirc they are making a upgraded ver Su-57M, idk what it will have.

    Reply
  8. I may be wrong but either the Navy's or Air Force's 6th gen is to go into production in 2030. The Blackbird II will only have a laser on it because it is so fast it'll fly into its bullets and missiles. I think Mach VI.

    Reply
  9. I think the problem is that theoretically the SU-57 advance technology can be a match to most western planes, but the lack of capabilities to produce and improve advance planes in large scale are the main problem.

    Reply

Leave a Comment