William the Conqueror's Savage Subjection of England



Witness the brutal aftermath of the Harrying of the North in 1070 AD. Explore William the Conquerorโ€™s devastating campaign that reshaped England and left the North shattered for decades.

Simonโ€™s Social Media:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/SimonWhistler
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/simonwhistler/

Love content? Check out Simonโ€™s other YouTube Channels:

Warographics: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9h8BDcXwkhZtnqoQJ7PggA
MegaProjects: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0woBco6Dgcxt0h8SwyyOmw
SideProjects: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3Wn3dABlgESm8Bzn8Vamgg
Today I Found Out: https://www.youtube.com/user/TodayIFoundOut
Highlight History: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnb-VTwBHEV3gtiB9di9DZQ
Brain Blaze: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYY5GWf7MHFJ6DZeHreoXgw
Casual Criminalist: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheCasualCriminalist
Decoding the Unknown: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZdWrz8pF6B5Y_c6Zi6pmdQ
Places: https://youtube.com/@Places302?si=u5C3dXhcJ4tFuY-4
Astrographics: https://youtube.com/@Astrographics-ve4yq?si=4J_1EcNWIjXSBFOl

source

47 thoughts on “William the Conqueror's Savage Subjection of England”

  1. The long-term effects of the Harrying of the North showed up even 16 years later when the Domesday Book showed that about one third of Yorkshire remained wasteland and the population was estimated to be 150,000 fewer than before William's campaign.

    Reply
  2. I have a rough memory being told when I was in primary school how William the Conqueror came to Exeter, Devon. And because the city would not open it's gates to him, any that were outside of the gates when they closed he had captured and gouged there eyes to cause shock and fear to gain entry to the city

    How true that is I do not know, but our history lessons on the subject never went further than 1066 Hastings

    Reply
  3. I really appreciate that you ended the video by acknowledging that, at it's time, this was all "simply an act of war". Too often do I see people around me judge the past by the standards of today.

    Reply
  4. I am following this and all the other channels now for a while and i rly enjoy the content, so please keep up the great work ๐Ÿ™‚ The only thing i would appreciate more is: More sources linked in the description or in the bottom of the cut ins and maybe less military content on megarojects

    Reply
  5. i dont know how i feel about this, if i was a French Gaul Viking hybrid then OK, but what if i'm Saxon gene of old school, I'm not sure im happy about it at all. I want to side with the Saxons but if im a dirty French Norman this is very annoying.

    Reply
  6. I donโ€™t know that utterly destroying the population and the economic base of a region is smart, nor is it just how waging war was done at the time.
    William removed the dissent and threat, but the region was then a total loss for many decades. He removed the thorn in his side, but it did not have to be done that way, and the infamy of this campaign shows that this was not the norm.
    He truly was a bastard.

    Reply
  7. I love the way you deliver your stories, but I have to have the subtitles on for the end of words/sentences when the inflection dips down to your lower decibels/volume… If I had the right jargon, I would have given the feedback a while ago. Reading some of the other comments gave me the idea.. Regardless, been a huge fan for a very long time.

    Reply
  8. William I upheld English Law as did everything in accordance with being a legitimate English king as that's what he wanted, he wasn't interested in being some sort of conqueror, he was the rightful King of England and captain of the English people continuing an unbroken line of English kings, in fact continuing after him Kings of England sometimes asserted they were ultimately elected going back to early England. It was a 'savage subjection' of rebels, not of England.

    Reply
  9. Thank you for publishing this. I am so tired of hearing certain educated people speak of the Norman conquests as if they were a civiliing, cultured influence. The better description was "Willy the bastard and his gang of psychopaths," as I heard it once described. These people showed their true colors during their influence in Jerusalem and the crusades later as well. Hardly a ivilizing or "cultured " influence, though their influence in history canยดt be disputed.

    Reply
  10. William I was the greatest King of England. All this is just Anglo Saxon propaganda at its highest. Slavery ended because of him, he made UK what it is today. He is family of Rollo the great Viking. Long live Normandy.

    Reply
  11. This post is a goldmine full of fucking wannabe tough guys who have also fooled themselves with regards to clever or wise worded writing ability with these embarrassing attempts at euphemisms. This is the only one to remember: the only way to always be relevant in the real world no matter the setting is to stay dangerous, capable and intelligent with regard to situation/environment. Relevance in artificial platforms is achieved by also being fake and artificial but IRL you are just harmless and easy to forget as a non-issue. Eyes alive out there to all of these dehydrated keyboard pipehitters and UFC Champs, you utter dorks are hilarious just like this tier one cringe abortion of a video. Someone with a flea market katana set on their second hand dresser tented their fingers after spending a concerning amount of time in their room at their mom's apartment (but they tell everyone they have a condo with a roommate) bathed in the glow of $11 50ft LED sriplights used to illuminate the "Dojo" and said to themselves "this shit is that shit hot, dope, sickaas thermite grenade fire jank that is gonna burn the Internets down due to the earthquake caused by how hard it slaps ob them streets" with very much undeserved confidence and then check to see if they can still make Hooters happy hour

    Reply

Leave a Comment