Why US Military Can't Replace These 100 Year Old Weapons



Many of the weapons and platforms in the United States Armed Forces show that newer doesn’t necessarily mean better.

The United States military takes pride in its reputation for possessing state-of-the-art technology. From fifth-generation stealth fighters to precision-guided munitions, advanced artillery shells, and the development of stealth ships and autonomous drone vessels, the United States maintains the most technologically advanced and capable armed forces globally.

‌

However, many of the systems currently used in the US military are surprisingly old, sometimes as old as 100 years old. Other weapons and platforms that were introduced decades ago have proven so effective that they will reach the century mark.

In this video, we take a look at some of these old, but fearsome weapons and analyze some of the specific reasons why the US is still using them today.

#themilitaryshow

source

20 thoughts on “Why US Military Can't Replace These 100 Year Old Weapons”

  1. all are awesome. the B52 has four twin engines because its small rudder could not keep the aircraft flying if it only had 4 large engines and lost one. It would cost far too much to re-engineer the entire tail assembly at this late date. so eight engines. Why fix something that's not broken?

    Reply
  2. The Chinook helicopter can definitely be improved upon today. With the current technology we already have, but it is still one of the best platforms ever when it comes to helicopter technology.

    Reply
  3. as i say, if something old it dont mean its unreliable and need a replacement
    my 20 year old Fiat Punto is still more reliable than anything new rolling out of mercedes or bmw factory, yes its outdated and not very strong (only 60 hp) but it does everything what a 200 hp merc, bmw or any other car can do (but more reliable since both the car and engine is more simple, has less thing to broke down)

    Reply
  4. I'm sorry the guy that made the Glock made good watches but I still say he makes a shity gun no safety and at week round a 9 mm sub caliber and no all official forces still use the 1911 up until the ride today I don't know where you got the ship box Glock from but all the Special Forces call that a sub caliber cuz it's chambered in 9 mm

    Reply

Leave a Comment