Why Russia’s Navy Is in Serious TROUBLE



Discover how Ukraine turned the tide against Russia’s once dominant Black Sea Fleet 🌊🚢, transforming it into an underwater tourist attraction. From the sinking of the Moskva to the innovative use of maritime drones, Ukraine showcases technological prowess against a formidable adversary. This video delves into the fascinating shift in naval power dynamics, highlighting Ukraine’s strategic use of low-cost yet highly effective unmanned systems against Russia’s naval setbacks. #BlackSea #BlackSeaFleet #NavalWarfare #aircraftcarrier #navy #russia #ukraine #moskva #InnovationAtSea #AdmiralKuznetsov #Kuznetsov
#themilitaryshow

source

31 thoughts on “Why Russia’s Navy Is in Serious TROUBLE”

  1. U.S.A IS FAMOUS FOR SPENDING BILLIONS OF DOLLAR ON PROJECT WHICH BORE NO FRUIT. PROJECT SUCH AS LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP, ZUMWALT CLASS DESTROYER,.U.S BELIEVE IN CREATING MORE PROFIT TO ITS MONEY HUNGRY MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    Reply
  2. Russian army read navy looks mighty but at the end? It's just a mighty piece of junk. Infact? The whole Russian military is nothing else then 1st class junk as you can see at the war against Ukraine. Everything they use is very good… for a bonfire.

    Reply
  3. Of a number of problems with the information in this video, I will simply point out a very obvious issue – at 9:24 you keep saying "Mazut" (Мазут) as though it is some special substance used only by Russia. Mazut is literally just the remnants of the purification of oil. It is specifically, the precursor of diesel crude oil, which is what Western oil tankers and cargo ships run off of, but more energetically and economically efficient. In the West, it is called fuel oil, heavy fuel oil, and bunker oil. It is the fuel or more energetically and economically efficient precursor to that which is used by most ships which are not nuclear-powered – and it's important to note that the United States, Russia, and Japan are the only 3 countries on the planet with nuclear ships, so this is hardly a relevant point and really drips of your personal bias despite this information being easily available online, requiring little to no additional time to verify before posting a video about it. Also, you claimed mazut was a "vicious, tar-like substance," and it is very telling that you cannot delineate the difference "vicious" and "viscous" even despite the 2 full minutes of context in your script discussing a liquid fuel.

    Reply
  4. War means not defeated by another biden says withstsnd the pressure to make billions of dallors.. By next year iam not there so funds America n nato in both accounts tobe safe….. ?
    Funds other shred by 4:27 Francee gernany sweden finland Rest nato are cartoons

    Reply
  5. Is it? They are putting out new ships on a regular basis replacing old soviet vessels. Sure the new ships are frigate and corvett sized but they have plenty of firepower. Russia can’t project the kind of sea power it could in soviet times but their enough for green water operations. Oh btw, the USSR had several aircraft carriers before the Kuznetsov with the Minsk class and its VTOL strike planes.

    Reply
  6. Looks like they dont care about their navy.
    They can hack commercial ships into collapsing bridges and blocking military ports for month.
    I wouldnt even bother building new warships.
    I would hire new cyberpunks instead… 🥷🏻🦾
    Im speculating obviously.

    Reply

Leave a Comment