Why Russia is Scared of New Abrams Tanks Arriving in Ukraine



Ukraine is on the verge of receiving 31 American M1A2 Abrams tanks, and their impact on the battlefield will be significant. How will Russia respond? Check out todayโ€™s epic new video to find out how Abrams tanks will make a huge difference in the battle against Russia.

๐Ÿ”” SUBSCRIBE TO THE INFOGRAPHICS SHOW โ–บ https://www.youtube.com/c/theinfographicsshowOFFICIAL?sub_confirmation=1

๐Ÿ”– MY SOCIAL PAGES
TikTok โ–บ https://www.tiktok.com/@theinfographicsshow
Discord โ–บ https://discord.gg/theinfoshow
Facebook โ–บ https://www.facebook.com/TheInfographicsShow
Twitter โ–บ https://twitter.com/TheInfoShow

๐Ÿ’ญ Find more interesting stuff on:
https://www.theinfographicsshow.com

๐Ÿ“ SOURCES:https://pastebin.com/fkq0FhSS

All videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise noted.

Our Secret Weapon for growing on YouTube โžผ https://vidiq.com/theinfoshow/

source

26 thoughts on “Why Russia is Scared of New Abrams Tanks Arriving in Ukraine”

  1. If the US canโ€™t which I didnโ€™t know that the Russian nuclear stock piles are either their missiles are not going to work or blow up in the silos on the tracking systems arenโ€™t gonna work and theyโ€™re gonna blow up somewhere on intended very few of them will actually at the target in the west so basically theyโ€™ll be new kingdom selves and then all the new Columbus was very little destruction on our end so I hope for their sakeโ€™s they donโ€™t do that

    Reply
  2. I feel like people are just misinformed by choice or by circumstance or whatever but the Ukrainian cruise of surviving so they can fight another day and go on another tank well as the Russians were losing more and more every time I told you give it time and the Russians will lose in Ukraine will have their borders restored and then they can join NATO they better let Sweden join NATO I swear

    Reply
  3. These arguments seem reasonable. I truly don't understand why we didn't send 500. The world cannot afford a loss in Ukraine. Russia will never stop. The majority of the populace is completely brainwashed. It is sad. I wish they had better information. Even here , we have to weigh truth from lies. However, we have access to all options in information.

    Reply
  4. Should give them some more of our Abrams tanks, they'll never be used and as said, this IS a good investment in decimating a bad actor, enemy of ours.

    So much the U.S. military and CIA does out in the world is bad, but Putin's Russia is a bad actor. Their failure to steamroll Ukraine revealed that they didn't have nearly the power we assumed, this is the chance to see that little power they do have just shattered.

    It is so sad, Putin came to power with promises to break the oligarchs and, if he had done that, he'd have set the stage for Russia to truly become great. But he put himself, just him, and his own wealth, over the entire country. Allowed any oligarchs who gave him half their wealth, now and in the future, permission to keep doing what they were doing.

    He is likely wealthier than Bezos, the richest man in the world… But when he is gone, he will be a man who ruined a continent-sized country, all for personal gain. He is the perfect illustration of the worst traits in man, allowed to run amok.

    Let's hope Russia gets a better leader, the leader Russians deserve, when Putin finally bites it

    Reply
  5. The problem is the Dnieper River, all but 7 bridges can't actually support the Abrams or the Leopard 2. In fact a good chunk of ex-Soviet infrastructure can't support too many full loaded Western style trucks crossing the same bridge at a time, much less armored vehicles. heck, the Ukrainians even wrecked a bridge using a German vehicle using the Leopord chassis but it had no armor since it was a towing vehicle not a tank (to be fair, they knew the weight limit of the bridge, it was kind of an emergency and they had to move the vehicle or lose it). So unless Ukraine really likes making new bridges in the middle of the war, these tanks aren't going to do much. And if they do make the bridges, they need to support heavier American or European vehicles, not the lighter ones they are used to making.

    Reply
  6. The Leo regularly outperforms the Abrams. I agree it's a valuable contribution to send them, but we shouldn't act like these will dominate or be a more valuable contribution.

    Reply
  7. This might the heaviest tank ever
    Bridges may collapse under this thing . There are a lot rivers to cross in the Ukraine. Why is it the US Marines have declined to have any more tanks in their service. Could it be that lighter less expensive weapons can take out these giant monsters? That is certainly been shown to be the case against the Russian tanks.

    Reply
  8. If the new appointed speaker of the house Mike Johnson gets his way the Ukraine will receive no support from the USA. And the presidential 2020 election will be overturned in favor of Donald Trump. Who will surely withdraw his support for the Ukraine. Maybe I failed to see how Vladimer Putin is such a great guy.

    Reply
  9. Haha…funny how you bring up taxpayer money when it comes storing the vehicles….but you go after anyone that brings up taxpayer money spent on the war.. especially compared to other countries.

    Reply

Leave a Comment