Why Madame Web Just Flopped



Morbius is no longer the worst movie in Sony’s Spider-Man Universe.

For more awesome content, check out: http://whatculture.com/
Follow us on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/whatculture
Catch us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/whatculture

source

49 thoughts on “Why Madame Web Just Flopped”

  1. The real reason Madame Web flopped was due to female writers projecting themselves on to the characters, instead of researching, understanding and knowing the characters before putting them on screen.

    Reply
  2. Sony are absolute morons. Did they not see the reception Andrew Garfield got when no way home was released and after it with many people calling for him to get his 3rd movie? All the money wasted on crap like morbius, this and soon to be Kraven (which looks rubbish as well) they could have just given him that 3rd movie! Would have been more profitable than the 3 films I’ve mentioned would be combined just because it would give people what they want. MORE SPIDER-MAN!

    Reply
  3. I'm not gonna watch this video. The answer to the title question is "It didn't. Not yet anyway. It was released the day before this video was uploaded."

    I'm not defending the movie. I saw it, and it's pretty "meh". I'm just really tired of people talking about how "Madame Web flopped" before that can be definitively known. Seriously, look it up. There are tons of videos, comments, and articles talking about how it flopped, before it even released.

    Also, (and this is just my personal opinion) I don't think it's as bad as Morbius. A low bar to clear, I know.

    Reply
  4. I havent watched this movie but any chance Sydney Sweeney could have just been Gwen and Tobey Maguire been Peter Parker like in the animation? maybe in the third movie couldve have introduce Ezekiel as a villian obsessing with the spiderverse and somehow he already capture madam web or he is hunting her and she sents some spider mental vision to gwen and maybe either one of the spider characters in Madame Web or more than one.

    Reply
  5. Is this Sony desperately trying to cling to every Spider-Man character, rather than have the rights go to Marvel? What was the point of including Spider-Man references if they were going to remove as many as possible at the last minute? Why is Sony so bad at this? Do they not care? With the writers they hired, it was never going to be good. Could they find literally no one else?

    Reply
  6. Create a movie no one asked for. Feature characters no one really likes. Make those character unrecognizable to scare of the few fans who could be interested. Hire the hacks who wrote Morbius and the razzie winning actress from 50 Shades. Add vague references to Spider-Man and a ton of product placement. I don't see how this could possibly go wrong?

    Reply
  7. This isn’t a Marvel movie. It’s a SONY movie based on a B list comic book character who has never had her own stand alone comic book title.

    Sony is banking on people thinking it’s a Disney Marvel movie. Heck Dakota herself thought it was a Disney Marvel project she signed up for and allegedly fired her management company because it wasn’t. It’s like Sony is trying to ruin the Spiderman IP so that Disney Marvel has to work harder to fix it when they finally buy it back or use the characters in crossovers.

    Reply
  8. Cant wait for the studio to blame comic book fans for not liking the film. They probably even ruined a ton of peoples attempts at a Valentine's Day date that both parties would enjoy but instead left both girls & guys walking out of the theater feeling this whole relationship is a mistake

    Reply

Leave a Comment