Why is Russia sending anti-aircraft guns ZSU-23-4 Shilka SPAAG to modern warfare?



Why is Russia sending anti-aircraft guns ZSU-23-4 Shilka SPAAG to modern warfare? Many sources claim that Russia has invested in new technologies to support production, both in the aircraft industry and in the production of heavily armored vehicles. Why is Russia sending anti-aircraft guns ZSU-23-4 Shilka SPAAG to modern warfare? Many sources claim that Russia has invested in new technologies to support production, both in the aircraft industry and in the production of heavily armored vehicles.

source

47 thoughts on “Why is Russia sending anti-aircraft guns ZSU-23-4 Shilka SPAAG to modern warfare?”

  1. These old AD weapon system are best used in clearing forest, tree lines, suppressing fire on buildings and reducing homes. A waste of ammo on drones and aircraft. Level the barrels at a ground target and fire devastation. Never assume to obvious

    Reply
  2. Why they sending ? They use Shilkas in Cheachen war to obliterate high rise building imagine 4 x 23 mm 2A7 autocannons blowing building a part. Multipurpose vehicle also can be used to take drones .Old crap but going to do more that one job,

    Reply
  3. For each fight you have to have .the type of weapon that interacts with the battlefield…so. God bless Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Slava โค๏ธ๐Ÿ–๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ‘โ˜๏ธโœŒ๏ธ

    Reply
  4. shilka is great system, for anti infantry and anti drone use, and with empty shells you can make ks23 shotguns!
    win win situation, definiteley use 23mm shilkas and ks23 shotguns, both very effective!
    i would also use 57mm anti air guns, in conjunction with all possible aa guns russia and friends have.
    30mm, 23mm, 14.5mm, 37mm, 45mm, 85mm, 100mm, 115mm, 76.2mm.
    old but gold.

    Reply
  5. All the keyboard warriors won't watch an unbiased clip of something like this. They will be far too busy, jumping down everyone's throat, while claiming 'our bombs are bigger and shinier than your bombs'. This will be perfect for AA tactics. Especially with the obvious massive usage of drones during the SMO. Meanwhile, the west are still arming Ukraine, which is using $400,000 missiles to down $20,000 drones. I don't care which side you support, those economic facts are not sustainable.

    Thank you for the clip. We who are interested in real military hardware from all over the planet. I will watch more after finally finding your channel.

    Reply
  6. ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐ŸšฉโœŠโญ๐Ÿ‘โœŒโค๐Ÿ˜

    Reply
  7. Obviously Russia is depleting it's stockpiles of old museum worthy hardware.
    Problem will be when they start fielding the more recent shit designed and built in the end of the '90 and beginning of 2000s

    Reply
  8. They can also be used as anti personnel weapons…age doesn't matter…look at the .50 cal. browning, the Ma deuce…been in use almost 100 years, but still widely used in all roles by all branches of the U.S. military..

    Reply
  9. The first satelite an Invention was by Russia. The Sputnik also still works and us a mist valuecofctodays Progress and modern age civilisation. Bravo ๐Ÿ†’๏ธ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ†’๏ธ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ†’๏ธ๐Ÿ‘

    Reply
  10. And to Think that when it comes to China and Iran these would all be AI and un-maned – You then have to think "That Drone, Aircraft, Missile, Tank, Radar" are all "One AI Mind" This is no longer a call of "did they get our message?" un-maned and all One AI Mind.
    The most realistic movie ever made is "Terminator" only in todays world there will be 50,000 Terminators all under One Single AI Mind.

    Reply
  11. ๐Ÿค๐Ÿ’™โค V Z ๐Ÿ–ค๐Ÿ’™โค๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿผ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿผ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐ŸผโœŠ๐ŸผโœŒ๐Ÿผ.Spasibo cheburash โ˜˜๐ŸŒป๐ŸŒพ๐ŸŒน๐ŸปโœŒ๐Ÿผ.

    Reply

Leave a Comment