Why Humans Could Be Living Underground in 10 Years



You’ll be amazed at what you can do with GrammarlyGO. Sign up at https://grammarly.com/thoughty2_ and get 20% off Grammarly Premium.

Thoughty2 Audiobook: https://geni.us/t2audio
Thoughty2 Book: https://geni.us/t2book
Support Me & Get Early Access: http://bit.ly/t2club
Thoughty2 Merchandise: https://bit.ly/t2merch

Follow Thoughty2
Facebook: https://facebook.com/thoughty2
Instagram: https://instagram.com/thoughty2
Website: http://thoughty2.com

About Thoughty2
Thoughty2 (Arran) is a British YouTuber and gatekeeper of useless facts. Thoughty2 creates mind-blowing factual videos about science, tech, history, opinion and just about everything else.
#Thoughty2

Editing: Sandeep Rai

source

45 thoughts on “Why Humans Could Be Living Underground in 10 Years”

  1. this is a dream come true, hopefully during my lifetime. humans need to do the Thanos-thing and cut population down to half then move themselves underground and give the surface back to nature and animals. how wonderful that would be, seeing it all happen from my little house above ground.

    Reply
  2. Dude, I'd live underground NP. Bunker life my guy! If your familiar with tech and maintenance of it, you can turn your underground apartment into a near disaster proof bunker.

    Reply
  3. Underground cities/homes would stay cooler in the summer, warmer in the winter, last longer, be more disaster proof, allow more room for wildlife and farming and more than likely be built out of materies that last centuries.

    Reply
  4. How about painting the streets grey so it would Lower the temperature by there degrees in the city and if we do parking lots the same we could slow down global warming quick by doing this on all blacktop and reflect about 35 percent of heat back up instead of getting hot think about it won't you

    Reply
  5. 54 hours per year is less than 14 minutes a work day (5 days per week, 48 weeks per year). People waste far more time stuffing their faces in their smart phones.

    Reply
  6. I'm so glad I live in the center of West Virginia, in the mountains. It will likely take my lifetime and beyond before there's a city even close by. It's a hard life sometimes, being so far from everything, but a blessing at the same time.

    Reply
  7. Was glad to see you mention Montreal's Reso, it's a very good example indeed, even though as you said, is mostly a world of shopping malls. However, the metro transit system, as one would expect, is also interconnected with the Reso, and many residential and commercial buildings are also attached to it, so technically, one can live, commute, work, and shop throughout the city without needed a coat, a car, or ever going outside during those brutal winter months if one chose not to. And even while Montreal is beautiful in the summer, it gets incredibly hot and humid, with temperatures reaching 30°c, so the Reso is actually really appreciated all year round. 🇨🇦

    Reply
  8. building downwards instead of up is a terrible idea for obvious reasons.
    The solution is to build pyramids apartment bocks.
    this way you solve the problem of blocking light.
    also it looks awesome.

    Reply
  9. Way too much could go wrong. You'd never catch me living in that death trap. This isn't an engineering video, so I get why you only glossed over "solutions" for some major threats. For example, using a pool as a reason that would work for walls underground is laughably simplistic. Soil types would play a major factor in whether or not this is possible, as well as sea level (try this in Florida and see what happens). I've been in civil engineering for 25 years and groundwater would be a bigger problem than you think, likely requiring regular maintenance. It could be done at shallow levels, but 300m deep? No. Here's the real chink in the armor: Architects are fruity. Most architects only care about what's pretty, creative, artistic, etc. They're not typically logical or rationale from a constructible and sustainable perspective. Structural and civil engineers would be the ones to come up with actual solutions. Unrealistic logistics aside, sure would be an easy target for terrorism or war. One simple bomb and you bury an entire city alive. Fuck that.

    Reply
  10. Earthscrapers, as cool as the name and concept sounds, have some VERY big problems, namely that you'd be living under the fucking ground for your entire life, and the way these things can be conceptualized you could have people going days or weeks without any sunlight, since they could simply work there, the children could go to school there, you could meet your friends there, etc.

    I highly doubt this is the future we want … it reminds me of a visit to Edinburgh once, where I pitied the people living on the lowest floor of those old buildings below street level … no, thanks.

    Reply

Leave a Comment