What does Truss' resignation mean for British support of Ukraine | Ukraine: The Latest | Podcast



Day 239. Today, Francis Dearnley and David Knowles speak to Journalist Sergio Olmos, who’s been on the ground in southern Ukraine speaking to soldiers and civilians as Ukraine forces advance towards Kherson. Starting the recording at 1pm, they also tracked today’s extraordinary events in Westminster and ask what the resignation of Liz Truss means for British support for Ukraine.

Contributors:

David Knowles (Host). Follow David on Twitter @djknowles22.

Francis Dearnley (Assistant Comment Editor). Follow Francis on Twitter @FrancisDearnley.

Sergio Olmos ( Journalist). Follow Sergio on Twitter @MrrOlmos.

Email: [email protected]

Listen to the first episode of a new podcast series from the Telegraph, ‘How to become a dictator’: https://youtu.be/IRGAelmVzbk

Subscribe to The Telegraph with our special offer: just £1 for 3 months. Start your free trial now:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/customer/subscribe/digitalsub/3for1/?WT.mc_id=tmgoff_pvid_conversion-subscription_editorial-iniative_03-22_EGW-13_organic_youtube

Get the latest headlines: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/

Telegraph.co.uk and YouTube.com/TelegraphTV are websites of The Telegraph, the UK’s best-selling quality daily newspaper providing news and analysis on UK and world events, business, sport, lifestyle and culture.

source

44 thoughts on “What does Truss' resignation mean for British support of Ukraine | Ukraine: The Latest | Podcast”

  1. the uk has relatively over spent on its military so in military matters it is more significant. However on economic matters it is less so. when it comes to rebuilding Ukraine we'll see how central the UK really is. After all the whole reason for the war is that the Ukrainian people voted for a pro EU government that renaged on its manifesto.

    But I'm sure the EU will be happy that the UK spent so much defending a future EU member.

    Reply
  2. Us 🇬🇧 citizens will make sure our government keeps double downing of support for Ukraine 🇺🇦 and make sure we keep them giving Ukraine 🇺🇦 everything they need we stand firmly with Ukraine 🇺🇦 slave Ukraine 🇺🇦 🇬🇧

    Reply
  3. We were told by every politician who ever worked with him until he mayor of London that he was totally incompetent; we watched him blag, lie and denigrated with bluster and bullshit, unable to grasp the lightest complexities. Finally, when he had lied so blatantly his ministers couldn't believe or cover for him. He was ousted deemed "not fit to govern". If he is now voted back in to lead the tories then it's time for a general strike and revolution

    Reply
  4. This is rubbish. Fact is there is no such advance for several reasons, such as having been contained after failed suicidal attacks, lack of manpower and withdrawal of personnel and equipment to reinforce the Belorrusian border.

    Reply
  5. An martial law was introduced to spare civilians from the terrorist Ukranian shelling. Unlike the Russian Army, it is indiscriminate shelling. War is about to end within the following weeks with the fall of Kiev. I would better change your speech soon if I were in your shoes.

    Reply
  6. As for the political crisis, notice the timing. A hundred years ago David Lloyd George quit as his coalition goverment fell apart. What he then said to the miners' delegation is pertinent now. 'There is no more Prime Minister'. In Truss's case, it did not even exist at all.

    Reply
  7. Those governments that persist to support Putin in his aggression are delusional in their perception that Russia will continue on the world stage as before the war. Putin has revealed his cards and shown the world that the Soviet Russia no longer exist in any capacity. Putin's mobilization has more to do with maintaining his grip on the Russian Federation, than fighting the war. Removing a threat of revolution by removing fighting age men and sending them to die in Ukraine.

    Reply
  8. The farm equipment is not just trackable.. they are disableable.. john Deere pressed a button and made those very complex combines into spare parts. They know they went to Russia and they are large paper weights now

    Reply
  9. The last interview in this podcast suggests that a Brexit benefit accrues to the UK from still having a leadership role in Europe, even though it does not have any decision-making power where it counts. Had we not exited Europe, we would have had at least as much a leadership role, and may have been able to convince our fellow EU members to provide more help sooner to Ukraine. It sounds like the true believers of Brexit are thrashing around trying to put lipstick on the pig that is Brexit.

    Reply
  10. Does the team have opinions on the Recent deepstatemap live Fire overlay (within the last 6 hours), showing positions of probable Russian Missile strikes within around 200M of the Romanian Border, in the south, and a large cluster of possible Ukrainian strikes in Transnistria?

    Reply
  11. If the Russian missile was fired towards the RAF aircraft was an error on the Russian side then why do these aircraft now need fighter escorts? How do these escorts make errors by Russian pilots any less likely? Clearly the missile fired was deliberate but in this case missed, so now we need fighter protection against further attempts to shoot down our aircraft.

    Reply
  12. I wonder if anti drone drones could be quickly developed. Small cheap machines that could match and mildly exceed the speed and agility of the Iranian drones. Load them up with a small explosive warhead (grenade?)and a proximity detonator. Or, simply have them collide with the Iranian drones. Even better, have their guidance be assisted by heat-seeking combined with audio. Just a silly idea, but who knows?

    Reply
  13. This is the latest news. A chirurgical strike against the missile facility at Kharviv has blown it up. The Ukranians are losing their missile capability and their supposed offensive -in fact, random shelling on civilians – will be stopped.

    Reply
  14. I expect that civilians will also be evacuated alongside the military equipment and personell, so Ukraine will have to let them retreat without harassment. Human shields – typical Russian tactic !

    Reply
  15. UK had been a blind US supporter for long time, regardless of PM (Tori/Labor). It really does not matter who comes after Truss. Nobody fears UK and frankly this PM firing/hiring drama is hilarious.

    Reply
  16. I do not know what's going to happen with the support that's going to Ukraine so they can fight. but I do know that they think the British people are incompetent in choosing a leader so they will just choose one for us

    Reply
  17. Very interesting presentation I like your in depth reporting. I just have one observation— the destruction of an up armored hummvee is not exactly a game changer for Ukraine or Russia these are cheap obsolete vehicles the US has been trying to give away for 10 years after they invested so much in mrap mine resistant ambush protected armored trucks and light armor personnel carriers. The armored humvees were a cheap stop gap measure for troops in Iraq and Afghanistan getting shredded by ieds and rpg ambushes.
    The US ships 50 or 100 to Ukraine and uses the money they cost to buy new vehicles. They are obviously more effective for Ukraine than Hillux pickups and corrollas which they would have to use otherwise.

    Reply

Leave a Comment