Was Casanova Actually A Womanizer? | Casanova | Absolute History



His name has become synonymous with the term “womanizer”. But a new perspective may shed a more positive light on the life of Giacomo Casanova. A true son of the renaissance, Casanova was a musician, a cleric, a spy and a lover. He led a tempestuous life where he amassed and lost fortunes, invented the National Lottery, fought duels with Counts, and had the most famous love life of all time. This dramatised documentary series is based upon a collection of letters left by Casanova in the library of Duchov Palace where he died at the age of 73, all but forgotten by a world that he had charmed, amazed and shocked only a few years before.

📺 It’s like Netflix for history… Sign up to History Hit, the world’s best history documentary service and get 50% off using the code ‘AbsoluteHistory’ https://bit.ly/3vn5cSH

This channel is part of the History Hit Network. Any queries please contact: [email protected]

#AbsoluteHistory

source

28 thoughts on “Was Casanova Actually A Womanizer? | Casanova | Absolute History”

  1. Isn’t Casanova a self admitted rapist/pedophile? Didn’t he write in his own autobiography that he molested an ex flame’s 9 year old daughter?
    Edit: he bought a 13 year old sex slave named Helene when he was 40 in 1765. In 1774 he wrote that he met with a former lover, an actress named Irene. He also describes how he molested her 9 year old daughter and how she “pleased him” and “did not reject his caresses”. Why are we still romanticizing this guy? He’s dead and the stuff I just mentioned, he admitted to himself in his own memoirs. He can’t sue anyone for slander, so why are we not looking at the skeletons in his closet?

    Reply
  2. “He will throw everything away for love”

    …more like lust. 😅 When you only get involved with people you know you can’t have or cut off “relationships” before you catch feelings, that’s not love.
    It’s not bad, if both people are willing, but it’s not love (imo)…and attacking someone? No.

    Reply
  3. Casanova was trying to find himself in sex. He had no true substance. His only pursuit in life was booty. There's plenty men even today who live their lives in the pursuit of conquest. Today, we'd call these people sex addicts which is likely what he was.

    Reply
  4. I enjoy docs like this but as an amateur historian myself, it’s always funny to me how modern people act like no one in history could have had modern ideas or thoughts. Many people did. But it was clear from the beginning that he was abused by the maid and that probably affected him his whole life. Perhaps because he was abused, he had more empathy towards women that other men of his era did not. After all it was much more common for women to be sexually abused at that age. I’m glad they’re acknowledging it can happen to men too, that’s ignored too often.

    Reply
  5. Ok, I was going to complain about the ugly actor they picked here, to play Casanova……..till I saw painted portraits of the guy….. What was wrong with the women back then? Were they all blind? Or just so sex starved? The guy was stumpy, podgy, had bulging eyes, fat cheeks, a child's mouth, short legs, terrible hair, etc! I looked and looked, and could not see ANYTHING remotely sexy about him, by any stretch of the imagination! There's just nothing there. He just looks like a short, podgy, chubby little boy, and not a good looking one. He just looks boring.

    Reply
  6. Those whom face their truths, live their truths, and have a clarity of truth, so far exceed their fellow 99%, (the masses whom never master their Lower Mind, aka Ego Mind,, most never even discover the fact, the "what holds them from their desires".)

    Reply
  7. Oh Casanova, can you believe, in the 21st Century, you're still being judged?

    If it was about indulging in Desserts, Wine, Gambling, Work, Drugs, etc, would each judgement be the same?

    Or is it a presumption that each woman was lied to?

    I don't think any were under the wrong impression, they chose to engage.

    It's that it doesn't follow the created superficial "Dance", a Cultural Ideology.

    That's why he's judged, he poured his energy into the Passion, the engaging, rather than the Dance.

    Reply
  8. The apologist trying to make Casanova a feminist modernist icon is laughable. He was clearly a sexual predator an addict.. you may have had tenderness but remember he had sex with his daughter fostering his grandson and a 7-year-old girl.

    Reply

Leave a Comment