US leads the world with nuclear submarine fleets



China currently has 78 submarine fleets with Australia behind at six, however this is subject to change after the AUKUS deal.

The United States is currently leading the count of nuclear submarine fleets with 68 while Australia, currently at zero, will soon acquire eight nuclear-powered submarines after the AUKUS deal.

source

33 thoughts on “US leads the world with nuclear submarine fleets”

  1. HERE WATCH THE BANK's FAIL IN THE USA AND JOE BIDEN MAKE FOOL OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE AS SUB CONs AND ROYAL FOIL's ALL GOING TWO LEARN THE RAGE FROM FACT's OF ACTOR's PLANS OF HOLLY WOOD ! THE BANK THE BAIL OUT FROM FOOD COST's HIKE's ONLY IR DOES LAST AS THE NEXT BANK FAIL's' THE CHINA UNDER WATER AND PUBLIC TELL's THEM LET IT ROT ! AS THE BUILDING THIS TOO PROTECT''s THE UN NATO CONTROL DRUG's AS BILLION AIR FOOL's ON THIS FAKE BANK STOCK's FROM BITE COIN AND CENTRAL BANK's MADE THE WEB INTERNET MONEY IN LOANS FROM TAXES WHAT BOAT's RUNNING THE SHIP MENT's

    Reply
  2. Nuclear submarine for now, next to counter other nuclear subs with nuclear weapons , Australia must be ready to be armed with nuclear weapons or the subs would be only ", half the man". ".Without balls"

    Reply
  3. Australia is just “buying” hand me down second hand goods from its master who is imposing a mandatory puppet tribute from its loyal dog. If Australia was smart they would see they are being used and stop paying a tribute to fund its master’s future war ambitions. Australia should maintain rational minded, make independent smart decisions that won’t bankrupt itself even further, and gain the courage to decline being a certain countrys tool

    Reply
  4. The naval and sub power of Britain today is a absolute joke. We should’ve never allowed ourselves to be out of the top 4 navy’s in the world (in the sense of a ally has a big ass navy – joint effort type thing.) being a island nation mostly relying on naval power it’s a absolute joke. The UK nowadays is a absolute joke. And we’re only known as Britain when were doing something potentially bad.

    Reply
  5. I think it will be better not to spend these money but rather empower the RSPCA to train whales and arm them with nuclear torpedoes. We've got lots of whales around Australia coastlines.

    Reply
  6. Lots of information not there , how many are actually in service , , what about Russia and it's ability to track all submarines , China will also have that capability , and have new missile systems , new underwater torpedoes high speed , see the media knows most the public has no clue about the huge advances in military technology , like directed energy weapons , A,I assisted guidance systems in all types of missiles , the arm's race has been continuously running for a long time massive advancements one side developing a new system the other has to develop new better systems to counter it , like the new Russian hypersonic missile systems , space based tracking systems Ultra high tech scanning underwater through solid rock , America has secret weapons systems they can't even talk about because the world simply wouldn't believe that kind of advancement was possible at this time , many countries have weapons that could literally split earth in half , so most of what the public see is obsolete , Russia has already got unbelievable advanced missile systems . .

    Reply
  7. China "leads the world, careers/subs killers", not only got US super carrier killers (hypersonic, the lowest speed "only exported", YJ21 Mach 10), but also US nuclear submarines/warships killers, "Stealth Heavily Armed Drone Subs (at the Havdex 2023)"

    Reply
  8. These submarines are going to be as good as my submarine tonight in the toilet.

    These idiots got sold the dream of bs outdated tech. Lol 😆

    You realise these heavy weapons are done and dusted. Take note of Russia with its might in tank warfare has been deemed useless if you get whipped out by a little rocket that is handheld and can be used by single person.

    These submarines will be wiped out by 100k rockets

    Other than taxpayers going to eat all this blowout in the budget and the super hero's that our stupid government believe that USA and UK got out back us lol 😆 they can't back themselves let alone us.every single war they been in need support with all that technology.

    Reply
  9. Sky news conveniently hid the Indian and Japanese naval power. India has a fleet of 20 subs out of which 2 are nuclear-powered. 6 diesel-electric under construction, 2 nuclear powered under construction and one large nuclear sub leased. With 30 subs by 2025 and another 10 subs in the next decade, India will be a major maritime power in the Indian Ocean and international waters.

    Reply
  10. Can anyone explain to me why new submarines are not autonomous. No onboard crew required, smaller, probably cheaper and expendable and if nuclear powered they would only need to resurface to re-arm.
    Actually come to think of it , I’m a pacifist, let’s forget the whole thing.

    Reply
  11. Why go nuclear submarines? I would opt to go with Space Nuclear hypersonic missiles like the Chinese. Imagine China start selling Space Nuclear Hypersonic Missiles like the one they tested last year circling around the Earth before vertically diving down. Hell, imagine every country will want at least 10-20 of their own. It's coming.

    Reply
  12. Why we let these warmongering leaders of the west especially the greatest coup US and it's greatest poodle UK and Australia and others hold us ransom?
    Enough is Enough!
    No to the wars!👍🤞✌️✊🙏

    Reply
  13. lol it was only 50 billions with france ! Now australia will pay 300 billions with usa . It ' s a pity , france had all new nuclear submarine ready in 2016 for australia but your gov wanted a diesel engine based on nuclear sub !
    This new deal with USA is a giant waste of money. You should buy the new french nuclear sub for cheap and already designed since 2016.

    Reply

Leave a Comment