U.S. Shocks Zelenskyy! Game-Changing Move for Ukraine's Armed Forces!

by



Host Olga Bilan shared important and up-to-date news as of September 6 in the latest broadcast. She commented on the situation on the Ukrainian front and revealed a shocking statement from the U.S. regarding Ukraine. Watch the video for all the details.

#ukraine #russia #news #warinukraine2024 #newsukraine #newsonline #freshnews

source

13 thoughts on “U.S. Shocks Zelenskyy! Game-Changing Move for Ukraine's Armed Forces!”

  1. NATO doesn't want Ukraine to defeat Russia, because if they do, what will the NATO guys do? Become unemployed. NATO is so cowardly, so scared and probably corrupt and bought by PUTINS money and POWER. In the unlikely event that Ukraine wins, NATO will take the credit. NATO can in the future only give contributions in the form of Painball rifles and colour bombs to Ukraine and ask them to just scream ( bang you're dead ) to the Russian soldiers who get paint on them. I have to say this, as the last NATO country Sweden has become, I am ashamed of their cowardice. Just office boys who never learnt what Honesty is and to be proud of something. Delle in Sweden

    Reply

  11. Escalation, the big bug-a-boo. Whomever talks escalation at this point is a foolish idiot.

    Even NATO understood last year that Russia's nuclear threat was hollow. The U.S. was the last bastion of the escalation rhetoric . Escalation, that's a damn foolish position for anyone to make. With regards to escalation, my 1st concern in war is to eradicate any thought of escalation by making certain the enemy has no choice but to surrender. Russia is hard pressed to carry a war on 2 fronts. Hell, they can't even handle the donbas and luhansk effectively. When you have skin in the game ,as the Ukrainians do, escalation is not as concerning as getting your country back.

    For all of Putin's bluster, just as Biden does, he's a one trick pony. A sabre rattling, joke that lacks a constructive foreign policy. Let alone an intelligence apparatus which failed and fed his meglomania to the point of not being able to tell him the truth. As for his nuclear threats, it's all bluster.

    Do you understand the theory of M.A.D. at all. Putin is a politician. Not a warrior. He understands the need to sabre rattle, but not get drawn into the nuclear dilemma. He realizes that ANY actual nuclear exchange will garner a detrimental effect to his country. He has no more economy. He is trading goats to North Korea for weapons and arms. Really the ONLY THING on his mind is trying to extricate himself. He can bluster all he wants but in all honesty, he knows he has lost in Ukraine. He's just trying to eke out a deal to save face.

    At the present,(from 2022 start to Sept. 2024) the Russians have lost 600,000 plus men dead and wounded.
    8,227 tanks
    15,862 armored fighting vehicles
    20,680 trucks ( support, transport and service related)
    15,368 field artillery pieces
    1,119 MLRS units
    892 air defense systems
    361 aircraft
    326 helicopters
    12,193 drones
    28 aircraft
    1 submarine

    With no cohesive battle doctrine the Russians are hemorrhaging men and material at an alarming rate.
    Even if Putin were eliminated or died, his successor would be hard pressed to keep ANY war machine in operation for 10 + years.
    The amount of rhetoric about the Russian state falling apart is only vocalized by the West as it needs a boogyman to blame.
    Look to the fallout after the Soviet Union broke up. There were issues certainly, however they were managed.

    As for Russia going forward, there is little hope that they will not fractionalize. Given their demographic and economic issues it must regionalize to a component state union or fade to history as a country. It is ostracized in the world economy, the technical domain and manufacturing. It's current demographic profile is bleak. The aged are becoming a larger portion of Russian society opposed by a very limited growth projection of working young. Russia is in a death spiral, it's too bad Putin can't see that.

    The reasons for the U.S. micromanaging the war in Ukraine is for some ego boost. Like the Brits did with the storm shadow debacle. 1st yes then No then ok, then not in Russia and finally, I guess so. The Empire building died about a century ago. But war is always profitable. And governments know this.

    There is a term in America, "get off the pot or pi$$". But remember this, look at where those billions are going. Not all that money is going to Ukraine. As with everything, FOLLOW THE MONEY.

    Reply

  13. With friends like US the Ukranians must love their ennemies. What Biden affirms is that the Russians can do whatever they like in and to Ukraine , but Ukranians are prohibited to efficiently strike back in Russia with Nato weapons, against military assets that are used to genocide their civilians. And this corrupt Joe also "orders his European lapdogs to comply with his policies regarding the weapons they supply to Ukraine. He goes to any length to prevent a Ukranian victory. So why supply weapons when you forbid to use it. They'd (the Americans) better stuff these missiles up Bidens a.. ss, at least there it would be extremely useful.

    Reply

Leave a Comment