Scott Presler – Gays for Trump: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmhxNkbfxZo
Photo of TPUSA promoting the sodomite Scott Presler in Wisconsin for Kelly’s campaign: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10159453926040017&set=p.10159453926040017&type=3
Pastor Matt on podcast last week talking about homosex: https://rumble.com/v2fbve4-29-march-2023-pm-show-special-guest-johnnyq.html?fbclid=IwAR1Jd_c1LIR9n9Nc81jShyCQVqI5Fq42Rcsoz5ZCC0mUQBn2XNtURCe5Co4
Are All Sins the Same? sermon – https://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=31223134506066
Why a Truly Christian People CANNOT be Subjugated by a Lawless State – https://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=723211211261
Latest 3-minute video from DEFY TYRANTS – https://rumble.com/v2f6lwy-there-is-hope-at-the-local-level.html
source
TRUMP HAD A GAY BASH AT MAR-A-LAGO along with KARI LAKE—BOTH REPUBLICANS! COME OUT OF HER MY PEOPLE!
Presler is not new to the Red party. He was on the Trump train in the 2016 campaign. Neither party is Christian nor do they care to honor Christ Jesus.
Thank you for sharing the TRUTH for all that love our LORD and Saviour Jesus. May we be BOLD like Daniel and the 3 Hebrew young men that did not bow down to un-lawful mandates. The sulpher balls are still found where Sodom and Gemorrah use to be in Israel. https://youtu.be/jQl4KaRtef8
Amen
Liberty = freedom + morality.
❤❤❤🎯 Thank You Amen
I pray that there is a righteous conservative alternative to the sodomite up there .I do not think this will happen any time soon in the south but things have devolved quickly everywhere . ( Makes one continue to wonder though how northern latitudes affect the way people think but that is another issue). So— a conundrum presents itself; short of doing the commendable thing of fighting evil and keeping the sodomites out of positions in legislature etc, are you going to sit at home when it comes time to vote which will assure that the Demoncrats win most every single office. Every time I have listened to your sermans ,you seem to disparage Republicans in general but never say anything against the outwardly purely radically evil and destructive demoncrats which I definitely do not agree with. ( Perhaps you have but I have not heard it). 99.999999999% of the righteous people in this nation are Republican or libertarian . Yes we must fight the relentless desensitization and infiltration by the LGBT (etc) faction which is just one of Satan's strategic battle plans but just because one or two sodomites identify themselves with evil that does not call for the condemnation of the entire Republican party so that millions of people do not vote against the clearly openly evil Marxist demoncrats. You need to make that clear or you will be responsible for the sure election of the worst possible people. Hopefully our prayers and actions will result in the best outcome but staying at home on voting day will not result in that.
Not voting for any of these goons….Dems or Republicans….never again because it will not be getting better.
😇🤗
Thankyou for message, I needed to hear it. Humbles me.
Keep speaking the truth
Even Christians who do not believe that God intends for modern nations to enforce every law God imposed on ancient Israel, such as those who believe that the punishments for sexual sins were heightened as an instructive foretaste of final judgment, should not be interacting with unrepentant sodomites in a way that suggests sodomy is acceptable behavior. Most people don't seem capable of separating legal tolerance from moral approval: if something is legal, they think, it can't be immoral. This could be one cause of current bad behavior by "conservative" politicians. Whether or not one believes that Old Testament penal sanctions are obligatory today, God's unchanging nature means that those sanctions were entirely just and expressive of God's moral character. Not requiring their imposition today would be an act of grace, not evidence that what were once abominations worthy of death are now morally right or even neutral.
Another problem is that even most Christians in America have accepted the secular invention of the "sexual orientation" concept. When speakers start out by saying, "I have nothing against gay people," they implicitly grant validity to a concept they should reject. Being aware of one's sinful inclinations is useful for knowing what temptations one needs to be most on guard against, but treating those inclinations as central to one's personal identity, or treating others' inclinations as central to their identities, is foolish. A homosexual or sodomite is anyone who engages in the Scripture-condemned activities associated with these terms. An inclination or "orientation" is not what makes someone subject to these terms; behavior is. Saying "I have nothing against gay people" confuses matters. Does the person who says this mean he has nothing against people prone to these particular temptations? Or does he mean that he has nothing against people who unrepentantly engage in homosexual activities? The former might be a legitimate expression of Christian benevolence; the latter defies God and invites judgment. But even if someone means only the former, the "sexual orientation" concept makes any reference to "gay people" imply the latter. Thus, Christians trying to display their mercy and benevolence end up downplaying the sinfulness of this sin.
Returning to the issue of legal tolerance versus moral approval, I think the pragmatic reality that so few people consistently make this distinction could be what forces me to abandon my ongoing thought experiment in Christian libertarianism. If people can't legally tolerate things without starting to think those things morally permissible, libertarianism cannot be made a viable option for Bible-believing Christians.
Back in December, I posted comments on a reading of Murray Rothbard's introduction to Lysander Spooner's "Vices Are Not Crimes" ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CopbDf7CDzk&lc=UgxPL6wWmJfDymi0AAp4AaABAg ). I wanted to see if anyone in that branch of the libertarian community had a response to your (and similar) Christian perspectives on issues of law and morality. So far, no readers have shared any thoughts. I've reproduced the comments below. I think your sermon confirms that I've rightly understood and presented the dominionist position, but please do correct me if I've misstated anything.
* begin quotation *
I've questions or comments on a few points. [I've only reproduced two of three in this quote. Page references are to a free PDF linked to from the video's description.]
(1) Any effective answer for Christian dominionists?
Since Rothbard tries to associate certain political views with varieties of Christian belief, I'll ask a religious question (after a preparatory paragraph).
If one spends much time interacting with Christian dominionists (people who believe all governments everywhere, falling under God's authority, are obligated to enforce God's law as found in Scripture), one discovers that the vices/crimes, victimless/victim-having distinction does not strike these people as self-evident or biblically sound. Since dominionists look to Old Testament law as normative, they hold that some of what are today considered "vices" are, in fact, crimes. Sodomy (Leviticus 20:13) is a prominent example. (Adultery [Leviticus 20:10] doesn't really fit into this category since it does have a victim: the non-adulterous party to the violated marriage contract.)
Have you found a response to dominionists that they find persuasive? Scripture indicates that God is a person who owns all things and people because he created them, meaning any "ownership" human individuals have is stewardship authority granted by God, not absolute ownership in the sense claimed by, say, an atheist like Ayn Rand. In the eyes of dominionists, Spooner's crimes/vices distinction breaks down in light of God's ultimate ownership of every person and all things. Spooner writes (page 9) that "Vices are those acts by which a man harms himself or his property" whereas "Crimes are those acts by which one man harms the person or property of another." But if God owns everything and everyone, vices are acts by which a man harms God's property. If God gives specific instructions identifying an act of self-harm as crime, whether an independent one (such as dressing as a person of the opposite sex: Deuteronomy 22:5) or a consensual one with another adult (such as sodomy), on what basis may a human individual claim a "right" to engage in that act of self-harm?
(2) Rothbard lets stand a false dichotomy
Rothbard's discussion of religious beliefs, based on his reading of "Kleppner and others" (page 5), fails to challenge a false dichotomy. That false dichotomy allows only two options: (1) complete "mind your own business" lack of concern about the behavior of others so long as that behavior does not become criminal, or (2) concern about the behavior of others that embraces use of force to correct both their crimes and vices. A "moral crusade," in other words, can never be conducted without the use of force. But a crusade by means of education and persuasion, even to the point of irritating others as a nag and busybody, is perfectly compatible with abstention from the initiation of force. Moral teaching and persuasion, even obsessive nagging, are not initiations of force.
Interestingly, by the way, today's dominionists typically label those of use who resist using government to win the culture war against others' vices "pietists," meaning to suggest that a focus on personal piety causes us to neglect our political obligations. (Those obligation, in the eyes of dominionists, are to ensure civil government enforces God's law.) This turns Rothbard's usage (borrowed from Kleppner, et al.) on its head.
* end quotation *
Thank you for your time.
That is as demonic as we could possibly be.
As an Apostle I do denounce it and renounce it!!!
God bless and reward you for speaking the truth.
Thank you for this sermon and information, I have friends who know homosexual friends, yes we are to love the sinner but hate the sin. They don't understand what will happen to the LGBTQ community when Christ comes, transgender is the ultimate sin, they see the homosexual and lesbian relationships as lesser sins, yet they fail to see, that all will be punished for their sin against God. So thank you for your pressing the issue and waking people up to this sin.
Thank you. ❤🙏🏼
Thank You Pastor Matt for this powerful message 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
The problem is more than sodomy. It is the sins of men that cause God to give them over to sodomy. The first of those sins is idolatry. Rock and Roll is idolatry. And the natural end of a Rock and Roll nation must be sodomy.
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate10 mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them." Rom 1:26-32
.
A courageous Pastor FINALLY stating the truth! I am encouraged I finally found one!
1 Corinthians 6:9-10
9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor [a]homosexuals, nor [b]sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.
PLAIN AS DAY.!
Wrong " bible" not interested in anything you have to say. The inspired, inerrant, infallible and preserved words of God are found, in English, in ONLY the Old King James Bible!
It is a shame too because I WAS interested in what you had to say.
That is my solid rock conviction and it will not be changing.
Psalm 138:2 in the KJB! How dare you put a perversion above God's preserved words!
Psalm 12:6&7 prove the perfection and eternal.preservation of the old KJB.
God himself puts his word ABOVE his own name.
Matt: I appreciate your boldness and uncompromising stand for the Lord and his word. I was able to attend the meeting in Greensboro NC and bought your book on the doctrine of lesser magistates and am encouraging friends to buy it as well. This sermon was spot on! Keep it up!