This is Why NASA Never Returned To The Moon



For copyright contact: stienlemane2379(at)gmail.com

Welcome to Futureunity, where we explore the fascinating world of science, technology, and the universe! From the inner workings of the human body to the outer reaches of space, we delve into the latest and most interesting discoveries that are shaping our world. Whether you’re a science buff or just looking for some mind-blowing facts, we’ve got you covered. Join us as we uncover the mysteries of the world around us and discover new frontiers in the fields of science and technology. Get ready for a journey that’s both educational and entertaining!

Disclaimer Fair Use:
1. The videos have no negative impact on the original works.
2. The videos we make are used for educational purposes.
3. The videos are transformative in nature.
4. We use only the audio component and tiny pieces of video footage, only if it’s necessary.
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing.

Disclaimer:
Our channel is based on facts, rumors & fiction.

source

20 thoughts on “This is Why NASA Never Returned To The Moon”

  1. Returning to the moon makes a lot more sense than Mars. Mars is over 490 times further away than the moon, hence many more times more expensive to fly humans there and return them safely. Furthermore, Mars is as hostile to life as the moon. Mars has an unbreathable thin carbon dioxide atmosphere that does not shield anything from cosmic ray radiation any better than the near-space vacuum of the moon. Additionally because it has a thin atmosphere, Mars has dust storms which the moon does not. Water, vital to life, is available (as ice) both in the regolith of Mars and the poles of the moon. Both the moon and Mars (unlike the Earth) do not have a magnetosphere to shield the planet from the solar wind Hence, as a hostile world, the moon rates higher than Mars in sending humans there. It's a three day rocket flight to the moon, compared with six months to Mars, and you can return anytime you like to Earth from the moon. Mars is a planet, orbiting the sun further out than the Earth and has a launch window to return to earth once only in 26 months (2.1 years), so you would have to spend that amount of time of Mars.

    Reply
  2. I teach the class that the reason that we stopped going because buzz aldrin said the moon has a dark side that borders on the edge of lunacy. Thats what ive been teaching.

    Reply
  3. as a species we will never reach the technological advancements to traverse the universe, seeing as our first venture into space separate nations competed on the same planet for the same fucking thing. the "space race" was stupid bragging rights

    Reply
  4. Lunar station would far better at this this time. Lunar station research in our solar system and finding and tracking space rocks.
    Development of low gravity industry might improve the researching viable space travel.
    Survival on the moon could prove the Survival of life on earth.

    Reply

Leave a Comment