Things About The O.J. Simpson Case That Still Don't Make Sense



Decades after the verdict was reached, many still scratch their heads at how O.J. Simpson was found not guilty for the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. It was the trial watched around the world, and it didn’t go especially smoothly.

#OJSimpson #Case #Verdict

O.J.’s arrest was not immediate | 0:00
The Ford Bronco police chase | 1:20
The trial’s venue changed | 2:30
A slow prosecution | 3:18
Cross-examining Mark Fuhrman | 4:15
O.J. tried the glove on | 5:23
Allegations of evidence tampering | 6:30
Key witnesses weren’t interviewed | 7:20
DNA evidence was not emphasized | 8:19
O.J. Simpson was acquitted | 9:22
O.J. wrote a hypothetical confessional | 10:24

Voiceover By: Tim Bensch

Read Full Article: https://www.grunge.com/1518899/things-about-the-oj-simpson-case-that-still-dont-make-sense/

source

50 thoughts on “Things About The O.J. Simpson Case That Still Don't Make Sense”

  1. OJ's daughter said: Her mom was arguing with a man, and it wasn't her father. Dick Gregory said: They cut Nicole's throat and pulled her tongue through it. That's called a (Canadian Necktie). This means it was a cartel hit. Nicole's family and the industry know exactly what happened. 😒

    Reply
  2. Nicole's family claims to care about her, but why didn't they help her to kicked her drug habit…i think that this is where everything goes wrong.

    OJ Simpson had nothing to do with the murder, he couldn't have killed 2 people and there weren't any DNA on his body…the so called evidence were planted (blood on the handle of his vehicle, a single shoe, and gloves) drug dealers masquerading as police officers, these were rogue cops planting drugs on innocent black men and terrorizing black communities…. OJ outsmarted them by drawing attention to himself by getting into the Branco , had they gotten a hold of him he would've been killed, he knew about their drug dealings… Nicole painted OJ as a monster because she knew that nobody would believe him, OJ wanted custody of his children and she wanted to have them as they're her meal ticket, she wasn't known for anything else but being OJ's wife, and tarnishing his reputation would make it difficult for the court to even consider giving him sole custody, they both had shared custody and she tried to keep him from seeing his children….Furhman and his cronies are very relieved that OJ died and didn't exposed them… that was their biggest fear…

    Reply
  3. Why would anyone put on Bloody Gloves that were used in a Gruesome Crime of his own Wife if they weren't comfortable with them? Looks like they fit to me' just shrunken because of the dried up blood and time that had passed….

    Reply
  4. …. yet those people who killed that kid . Emmitt Till was walking around free, and people aren't freaked out about that!?

    The lady who accused that kid, Emitt Till of whistling at her, said she was lying right before she died. But no, let's all focus on O.j instead. 🤷‍♀️🤦‍♂️ cmon man

    Reply
  5. Only a narcissist, can turn the brutal murder of two people in the prime of their lives, into a tear jerking story about himself! Even at the heights of what this life can offer, OJ was ever the victim. Classic, all about me, narcissism!

    Reply
  6. Cool. Next, let’s do a series on the countless cop killings of unarmed black people and how those cops got away with murder. Then we can move on to Kyle Rittenhouse, then Zimmerman, then…..

    Reply
  7. What didn't make sense to me is how the "Dream Team" made a point about how arthritic OJ was that he could not hold a knife properly to do stabbings, but then sometime later during the trial they show OJ picking up one of his kids over his head and no one said anything!!!

    Reply
  8. The whole thing was a work. How is it that Marcia Clark prosecuted the most important case in LA County? Gil Garcetti was the prosecutor yet he didn't work the case. This makes absolutely no sense. Why would a prosecutor pass off "The Trial of The Century" to someone else, particularly to someone with little experience? Do you think it's a coincidence that Gil's son Eric would eventually become mayor of LA? Too many red flags for me. I call BS on the whole thing.

    Reply
  9. This case is why Jonathan Majors had to get off with some kind of charge even if it was made up. “Reckless fleeing” he broke her finger while trying to get away from her 😂
    This unmitigated fumbling of this case is why examples must be made now.

    Reply
  10. How could there be so much research, and still get much of the facts wrong? It wasn’t the glove. We watched the entire thing from the Bronco chase to the trial at USC. OJ was a horrible actor, the glove—his overacting— actually made him look guilty. The case was pretty much done UNTIL that Mark Fuhrman part. White Supremacist cop with a history of planting evidence and then bragging about it, completely unhinged the case. LAPD already was guilty in the eyes of the public, the riots just happened 2-3 years earlier. That literally was the only thing that blew the case — THAT became the smoking gun.

    Reply
  11. 2 innocent people were slaughtered and the guy who did it got away with it. The jury should be disgusted with themselves. Their level of perception and seemingly the majority of the USA perception of that time had no place on a jury let alone a court room. He walked free

    Reply
  12. Mark Furman planted the glove on Simpson's property and blood smears in the bronco! Also, OJ didn't have time to commit the murders! Whoever commitied those murders would have been completely covered in blood! Look at the crime scene!

    Reply
  13. The jury has basically been criticized by white people for not ignoring evidence tampering and police misconduct. The caucasity of these people to all of a sudden accuse a jury of racial bias is hilarious 😂.

    Reply
  14. Considering years later interviews with the (black) jurors, who said they thought OJ did it, but specifically said not guilty to "get back at the white people" for what happened to Rodney King.
    I have to wonder if the jury would have said the same thing had OJ been caught on camera actually sawing Nicole's head off?

    Reply
  15. WHY DOES THE MAJORITY OF WHITE MAINSTREAM MEDIA CONTINUE TO PRETEND HOW O.J. KILLED THESE PEOPLE WITHOUT A SCRATCH ON HIS BODY & WAS ABLE TO GET TO LAX AIRPORT WITHIN 25 MINUTES TO CATCH HIS FLIGHT FROM BRENTWOOD. MENTAL ILLNES IS A BIG MONEY CASH COW IN THIS COUNTRY. THE ONLY PEOPLE O.J KILLED WAS IN THE MOVIE " THE KLANSMAN" W/ RICHARD BURTON , & LEE MARVIN

    Reply
  16. Its absolutely remarkable how anytime a black man is found guilty, he is guilty according to the court of law. However, if a black man is found innocent he is guilty found guilty according to the streets. When can a black man be innocent? Or is he always guilty when in the judicial system?

    Reply
  17. The domestic abuser (he pleaded no contest, this is undisputed) was found not guilty of murder because he was rich enough to hire a bunch of good lawyers that exposed a cop for being a racist and Nazi merch collector.

    No wonder it made for such good TV!

    Reply
  18. Everyone in the world knows the butcher got free because of a joke of a justice system and stupid jurors who did not understand DNA or forensic evidence! How the lawyers who defended him sleep at night ,still escapes me. In every normal country with all that INSANELY overwhelming forensic evidence,the slaughterer would have been sentenced to life prison. But in America, the racial circus and everything that had nothing to do with the two innocents murdered, came to play. We in other countries watched lauging via tears ,disgusted and dismayed . This case was a sham of US justice.

    Reply
  19. One of the "white" female jurors on the case was recently interviewed and said she voted not guilty for a number of reasons. The first was the mishandling of the DNA evidence by the police. Mark Furman (the one who "found" the glove.) lying under oath. The fact that Ronald Goldman was a third-degree black belt (karate) and J.O. didn't have any fighting injuries. Also, the "white" female juror had a s*xual fantasy about being with a black man openly (remeber this was the 90's). She also stated that the "white" male jurors had s*xual desires toward J.O. too. Finally, she said remember "…if the glove don't …." Well You know the rest.

    Reply
  20. Ok right now, how many of you, your blood is right now on the floor at someone else's house? Zero. Ok, IN YOUR ENTIRE ADULT LIFE, when have you had your blood on the floor at someone else's house? OK this is possible, playing hoops, got bopped in the nose. One or two times, ever, your entire life. Ok, how now many people's blood is currently on the floor of YOUR house? Unless someone JUST bopped their nose or cut themselves cutting onions, ZERO. Ok, IN YOUR ENTIRE ADULT LIFE, how many times someone else's blood is on the floor of your house? It happens, as we know, playing ball or cutting onions. So the odds of either scenario are so rare, you could recall them. Since it only has happened a few times ever, your entire life. So let's say you cut yourself cutting onions, it happens! Your friend gets a bandage and wraps your finger. And not a nick, enough you need a pressure bandage. How many times (outside the trades) you've cut yourself so deep you need a bandage, not just a band-aid? Only once for me in 1988. I remember exactly why, and I still have the scar. So……… So on the SAME NIGHT your ex wife and her friend are found dead…….. your blood was at her house. Her blood was at YOUR house. Her friends blood was found at YOUR house. You arrive to the police station with a deep cut on your hand covered in bandage. And, shoeprints found at the scene size 12 of a very unique shoe that cost $350 (in today's dollars), there's pictures of you wearing those very size and model shoe. Guilty. And it's not close.

    Reply
  21. The racist cop planted the glove and the blood with EDTA, a blood preservative. Poured from a tube. The killing was a drug debt that was owed by Ron Goldman. He was followed to her house and ambushed by the killers.Nicole was collateral damage Ron Goldman friends were killed in the same like manner. O.J had no reason to murder his ex-wife.

    Reply
  22. And this piece conveniently skips over the drug abuse by NBS and the shady figures she and Reznik were known to hang around with? What about all the drug dealing going on at mezza Luna and two of their friends recently killed in the same fashion as she was prior to her own death?
    OJ suffered from RA yet he’s able to overpower and kill NBS AND Goldman who’s half his age and a black belt in martial arts and not have a scratch on him and all this with a 25 minute window? Goldman had defensive wounds which means he was fighting for his life. What about the preservative found in the blood on OJ’s socks? Nancy Grace poured the Kool Aid and you all drank all of it….

    Reply
  23. There's no motive for LAPD to commit the murders and frame OJ. OJ had all the motive in the world to do it. He was already beating Nicole regularly. There was overwhelming evidence but the circus in court screwed everything up.

    Reply

Leave a Comment