The Year Without a Summer (1816 to 1824) – Historia Civilis Reaction (Part 2)



See the original – https://youtu.be/R0wwuj0sTyY?si=skFtcFxszXMwf10k
See part 1 of my reaction – https://youtu.be/-FnXV0n7-7Y
HC Congress of Vienna Reaction – https://youtu.be/El5Tgx8Nd2U
See my new channel Stories of the Great War here – https://www.youtube.com/@StoriesoftheGreatWar
Check out (and subscribe) to Stories of the Civil War here – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMASZptCZYFw51gzSXpVG2g
Support VTH on patreon: https://patreon.com/vth
VTH Gaming – https://www.youtube.com/c/TheHistoryGuy
VTH Extra – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQS_4Y0cukXPo1x-4JCu6uw
Follow me on instagram here – https://www.instagram.com/vloggingthroughhistory
Follow VTH on Facebook here – https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100088099516191

#reaction #history

source

26 thoughts on “The Year Without a Summer (1816 to 1824) – Historia Civilis Reaction (Part 2)”

  1. Man, like every state has a Fremont in it.

    Mine is the home of Gerber Baby Food. That's like the one thing it's famous for.

    And a pretty good pizza place: shout-out Spanky's! Fueled my teen years.

    Reply
  2. 7:25 we've seen that exact thing here in Oregon.

    Our current governor was the Speaker of the House for nearly a decade, and she pushed a hardcore liberal agenda. She's the one who gave the governor basically infinite powers to violate the state constitution during the pandemic.

    Now that she's governor, though, she's been positively moderate. Some of her policies have been… short-sighted, but she's proven to be the best governor we've had in 15 years.

    Reply
  3. 14:48 Great time to re-emphasize the point made earlier in this series. The "Conservatives" in Britain are the "conservative faction" of the Whig Party. Sure they are moving more and more towards being formally separate parties by this point, but the point remains that the Overton Window in Britain is much more liberal than that of continental Europe. With the Hanoverian succession 100 years prior, Parliament assumed for itself the right to determine who was fit to be King and the Whigs championed this development while the OG Tory Party withered on the vine of Jacobite Risings trying to turn back the clock. "The Gov't of this country for the past century is, and could only have been, a Whig Gov't".

    Reply
  4. 26:44 I said this in the comments of the original video. I think this section was a little overwrought trying to make the case that the British took America to the cleaners (thus justifying the "Americans please leave the room" jokes).

    Reply
  5. I think the main reason for HC consistently calling the French intervention in Spain “reckless” is that they went in without a proper exit strategy in case their initial plan of “restore the King, who certainly must have learned the value of compromise by now, to the throne by force” somehow failed. The French were not willing to hand Spain over to the liberals if the King refused to follow the plan, so they were stuck being a foreign occupying force, propping up an unpopular monarch, in a country that had shown them just how devastating that job can be only a few years earlier.

    Reply
  6. Tsar Alexander sounds a lot like Putin TBH. The parallels between him thinking the international community conspired against spain is more or less what Putin thinks happened in the 2014 Ukrainian Elections.

    Reply
  7. Honestly I was scared for Canning and his policies, considering what happened with Castleraegh and the sudden change in government, but I’m in full support of his decisions, perhaps even more than his predecessor. He set the bar high, well done to him 👏🏾

    Reply
  8. One note on the western colonies. It is the French that are the only European power to still have continental land in the western hemisphere. The Dutch, British, and Spanish only have tiny island groups or just random islands now. I think that’s a rather interesting result.

    Reply
  9. If only we had more people like Canning these days, people willing to agree with people of another party in order to do the right thing. The world might be a better place. Now we mostly have sycophants and yes people for those that don’t represent their true beliefs

    Reply
  10. I watched a two video history of how slavery became abolished in Great Britain and her colonies. The commodity that was the problem was sugar not cotton. The sugar barons bought properties in England that gave them seats in Commons. There was a need to reform how seats in Commons were given and a new system had to be developed with political concessions.
    Remember Tarleton? That cavalry officer in the Carolinas? He was a supporter of slavery and associated with the sugar barons. It took about 30 years of political change and reform and slave rebellions to accomplish the abolition of slavery in the British Empire.

    Reply
  11. Funny thing is that actually even with the monroe doctrine "in place" spain did try to retake south america by force in the Spanish-South american war of 1865, where a coalition formed by Argentina, Chile, Peru and Ecuador fought against Spain in a sort of "Re-reconquest", mostly naval battles took place where Chile and Peru took a relevant role (and ironically captured several spanish ships, so the more Spain attacked, the strongest the chilean and peruvian Armada became). Eventually Spain was kicked out (again)

    Reply

Leave a Comment