The WORST thing in film SWORDFIGHTS



This things appears in SO many film and television swordfights and I HATE IT
#shorts
Be sure to check out the full Fight Scene Autopsy here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-RV83tXaK4

source

39 thoughts on “The WORST thing in film SWORDFIGHTS”

  1. Star wars has plenty good static binds and there's also an explanation for it and it's the pull that lightsaber have towards eatchother and it takes lots of focus and strength to break it like anakin sliding down dookus lightsaber to cut his hands off

    Reply
  2. I’m afraid that as is so often the case, you neglect the needs of cinematography, in this case the need to express the balance of power between the combatants, their emotional investment and the nature of a sword fight as a ‘conversation’.

    Experts, even semi-professionals can see what the average person cannot, so they do not need these visual queues and often become annoyed by them. But for everyone else, they need something – just as grenades explode as if they’re loaded with gasoline.

    Also, as ever, criticisms of Star Wars should not be taken as appropriate. Saber Lock is an established element of canon.

    Reply
  3. One of my pet peeves is when they try to do an surprise attack but they shout it out loud, or when they shout the name of the techniques they are using. That’s the same as telegraphing but it is 10x more stupid

    Reply
  4. I’ve always did wonder because I tried it in real life and I got hit in the face with my wooden sword by my friends it doesn’t work. Glad it was wood and not a real sword or in ancient time 😅 I’d been dead

    Reply
  5. In my head Canon lightsaber blades are acting like strong magnets when you press them into each other. They don't really touch,… There is a strange phenomenon that pull themselves to each other but also isolate tgr blades from each other.

    Reply
  6. TBH the static bind makes more sense with lightsabers since fighting with them is as much martial than it is mental/with the force… shouldn't necessarily be included in this video.
    My pet peeve is when people on youtube try to criticize HIGH FANTASY and HIGH SCI-FI with real world criteria… oh a movie has people flinging fireballs and has dragons but this armor is slightly too sturdy… 2 words: FANTASY MATERIALS… the same can be said for fights with lightsabers… cannot just apply real world criteria when there is the force

    Reply
  7. The problem with this is that when the sword interlock for example the backsides are pressed against each other and they are sharp the grip is like sand paper so it’s hard to slide them off(speaking from experience)

    Reply
  8. Lightsabers get an excuse because when they are in a static bind, the blades are actually attempting to sort of magnetize to eachother. It becomes much harder to move the blade unless you pull away.

    Reply
  9. I am now motivated to make a movie where a bad guy does the "static bind" on the hero, starts his evil monologue, and is killed mid sentence because the hero has common sense and does one of the things Shad showed in the video.

    Reply
  10. I recall a scene in RTOK where Aragorn gets caught by an orc’s weapon…looks like a stupid bind till he twists a bit and slices the rotten creature and just keeps moving.
    Always loved that. Subverts without intending.

    Reply
  11. It is a movie method meant to show oppositon. Most people (including me) want to see well coreographed, visually pleasing action sequences in movies with no concideration that crouching like a chicken and flailing with half assed feints would be more accurate.

    Reply

Leave a Comment