The SpaceX Starship Test Flight 2 Update Is Here!



Starship Test Flight 2 Update Is Here!

Last Video: NASA Reveals New Lunar Rover!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JC26ydgvD2Y&t=31s

►The Space Race Merch Store Is Live! Shop our first release while quantities last: https://shop.theteslaspace.com/
► Join Our Discord Server: https://discord.gg/zfMNSnuRQN
► Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/theteslaspace
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Space Race: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheTeslaSpace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBfN0491sF0SQRy0-pZBjdnBaU6JsWr4B

SpaceX News and Updates: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBfN0491sF0QGbrNimSIWKYeyQ7JjENhE

The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans’ mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race… you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!

► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: https://www.theteslaspace.com

Business Email: [email protected]

#Spacex #Space #Mars

source

37 thoughts on “The SpaceX Starship Test Flight 2 Update Is Here!”

  1. Better to accelerate slowly without explosives with 1g+ high after under 1 year near c half way to stars

    Hg ring accelerator drive with propulsion through linear braking in tubes without loss of recoil mass Energy from cold fusion by shooting Hg in D2O and new CO2 turbine circuit with FK compressor return cooling th. Isolatable efficiency almost 100%.

    Besser langsam ohne Explosivstoffe mit 1g+ hoch nach unter 1 Jahr nahe c halben Weg zu Sternen beschleunigt

    Hg Ringbeschleuniger Antrieb mit Vortrieb durch lineare Abbremsung in Rōhren ohne Verlust von Rückstoßmasse Energie von kalter Fusion durch schießen von Hg in D2O und neuartigem CO2 Turbinenkreis mit FK Kompressor Rücklauf Kühlung th. isolierbar Effizienz fast 100%.

    Reply
  2. Lol…so pathetic….the flight failed!!! Good data can still be collected and there were highlights and successes but overall it failed again. Can you imagine back in the 1960s if NASA cheered failing like the Musk cult does???

    Reply
  3. It's really just as incredible that the ground crews were able to destack, replace grid fin motors, and restack the rocket and do it literally overnight. Think NASA could pull that trick off? "Launch to be rescheduled. We'll announce when the reschedule will take place, in two weeks."

    Reply
  4. Between 3:02 and 3:06 in the clip you can clearly see a HUGE piece of plate steel flip upwards that nearly clipped the starship as it was lifting off. That could have damaged the pressure chamber of the fuel tank and been a colossal failure of the launch.

    Reply
  5. Excellent coverage & summation of this second StarShip & SuperHeavy launch. I've looked closely at the SuperHeavy RUD for any evidence the Staging Ring & pressure dome grenading first because I'd suspected that there were damages caused by the Hot Staging event. It looks like that all held up and the problem was with Raptors flaming out all on the same side at first. A Clue to fuel starvation resulting from the powered flip, maybe ? Anyways, it looks as though SpaceX's new FTS works Much better !
    It's the StarShip RUD that puzzles me. There were some large bursts of gas just prior to Engine shutdown or RUD via the FTS. I was pretty excited to see all six of the SS Raptor Engines stayed lit up to the RUD event, but whatever happened is now up to SpaceX to determine & hopefully enlighten the rest of us. Better log onto X and have a look see at Elon's version.

    Reply
  6. The number of those who give flack for the progress spaceX is making is staggering to me. How can so many be so willfully ignorant to the R&D process and not comprehend how far spacex has come in such a short amount of time? You can dislike the owner of a company all you want, but to deny the feits that have been made? That's just willful ignorance.

    Reply
  7. With the Starship, if you watch the LOX Gauge, you can see it starts out a tiny bit higher than the CH4 and after the first puff it starts draining faster. Most likely a LOX line broke. When the Starship noticed it couldn't make the altitude it needed it said goodbye.

    Reply
  8. it was a failure, a thermonuclear second failure; perhaps, when one engine failed, a spotlight was turned on into the engine to make people believe that everything was working.
    If they have to build a starship for every 40 miles traveled beyond the previous test before it explodes, considering the Earth-Mars distance is 140 million miles, do the math and calculate how much time it will take for this suppository (and the number that needs to be built) to be ready to get a crew on board.
    Aspiring capricious dictators with spoiled and whimsical behaviors must receive lessons from adults who, with fewer computers and technological knowledge, less knowledge a bout space and less space exploration attempts, managed to send men to the moon. pathetic

    Reply
  9. It's all bullshit! At those alleged speeds, there would be no plume of any gases. No initially, anyway. It would be more like a tight stream. And the booster wouldn't gradually turn. Once it's off course by a few degrees(10 or less), it would be whipped back instantaneously and disintegrate! Anybody who's ever stuck their hand out of the window of a moving car has experienced this! Now times that resistance by 50 to 100 times, or more! Even in the thinner air of such altitudes, the effect is undeniable! And what unobtanium alloy did they use to skin the thing with that could withstand the incredibly high heat generated from traveling at such incredible speeds(24,000 kph, 15,000 mph, Mach 20)? The SR-71 skin could only withstand Mach 4(that's being generous!) before heat damage was apparent!

    Reply
  10. SpaceX needs to reroute the plumbing to incorporate the fuel flow on a horizontal plane relative to the ships' position so fuel flow is uninterrupted. Another alternative is to somehow immediately repressurize the fuel system to avoid plumbing hammering from gases in undesired fuel lines

    Reply
  11. It’s clear due to this failure that the 2025 moon mission won’t happen. The first mission will be 2027 at the earliest and probably 2028. There aren’t enough flights available per year to get everything in the NASA contract complete before then.

    Reply

Leave a Comment