The Secret Box that Was Snuck Out to Completely Change WW2



On the morning of August 29, 1940, amidst the ferocious Battle of Britain that roared in the skies, a select group of men, handpicked by Prime Minister Winston Churchill, boarded an ocean liner and departed the country. At that moment, this British team on board the vessel represented the last glimmer of hope for a beleaguered Europe.

Comprising the United Kingdom’s foremost civilian and military scientists, the group embarked on a journey to Washington, DC, in an attempt to turn the tide of the war, which had been heavily favoring Nazi Germany until then.

Officially designated the British Technical and Scientific Mission, the men informally referred to it as the Tizard Mission, named after their leader, Sir Henry Tizard, the chairman of Britain’s Aeronautical Research Committee. Their objective was to share Britain’s latest military technological breakthroughs with the hesitant American government in exchange for access to the United State’s vast industrial capacity, thus facilitating the production of weapons derived from the research.

Among the many secrets transported across the Atlantic was a critical piece of hardware invented only months prior. As several historians have noted, the Tizard Mission helped bring incredibly valuable cargo to the shores of America…

–

As images and footage of actual events are not always available, Dark Docs sometimes utilizes similar historical images and footage for dramatic effect. I do my best to keep it as visually accurate as possible. All content on Dark Docs is researched, produced, and presented in historical context for educational purposes. We are history enthusiasts and are not always experts in some areas, so please don’t hesitate to reach out to us with corrections, additional information, or new ideas. –

source

26 thoughts on “The Secret Box that Was Snuck Out to Completely Change WW2”

  1. Britain was right to be reluctant to share technology with America. The British gave all their nuclear research to America. America refused to reciprocate after the war. America helped Britain but also helped themselves win the war in the Pacific. Britain did not need the Norden bombsight. It was rubbish.

    Reply
  2. It's always good to see research and development from early stages, too: things can go wrong or right from any point.
    The long term, and especially post-war period, is often overlooked.

    Reply
  3. What i have learned from a number of documentary's, is that the Norden bombsite was not an instant succes. It failed many times in accuracy, like we here in the Netherlands have experienced. Only later in the war it was succesful.

    Reply
  4. The Norden bombsight was largely myth. The British bombsight was equal to the Norden one. Actually the Sperry company made a bombsight which actually was better than the Norden one, but politics played its usual nasty game and the Norden item was the one that got the major contract.

    Reply
  5. The Battle of Britain was, as Sir Winston Churchill said, Britain's finest hour. And I don't mean the generals & admirals & politicians, but the little bloke. The average citizen from the brilliant scientists to the guy on the street. And of course their military. God bless them all. πŸ™β€οΈπŸ™β€οΈπŸ™β€οΈ 🫑 πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

    Reply
  6. Then we (USA) paid the British back by shutting them out of the atomic secrets, that their scientists worked on. Windscale was partially our fault as they didn't know some critical things about graphite piles.

    Reply
  7. Victor Davis Hanson said that the collaboration between GB and the US was one of the keys to Allied success. They collaborated on electronics, cannon barrels for tanks, aircraft engines, etc. Germany, Italy and Japan did almost no collaboration.

    Reply

Leave a Comment