The RIDICULOUS Steam Submarine: The K-Class Failure



The K-Class submarine was a attempt by the Royal Navy to create a submarine capable of keeping pace with the massive dreadnoughts of the era – but sadly the design was badly hampered by issues from the start. The choice of steam turbines for a propulsion method presented the crews with an intricate dive procedures that had to be followed closely and without mistakes – a single error could doom the sub. What resulted was a series of accidents and mishaps that killed dozens of sailors and created deep embarrassment for the Admiralty. This is the true story of the British K-Class submarine!

Edited by Alex Anastasakis
Animations by Jack Gibson

Oceanliner Designs explores the design, construction, engineering and operation of history’s greatest vessels– from Titanic to Queen Mary and from the Empress of Ireland to the Lusitania. Join maritime researcher and illustrator Michael Brady as he tells the stories behind some of history’s most famous ocean liners and machines!

#submarine #disaster #history #sinking #war #military #navy #royalnavy #documentary #facts #story #maritime #ships #subs #accident

source

31 thoughts on “The RIDICULOUS Steam Submarine: The K-Class Failure”

  1. The future King George Vl of Great Britain nearly died on a K class submarine while serving as a midshipman. After a diving demonstration it wouldn’t resurface, eventually the crew were able to get the submarine to do so.

    Reply
  2. Since nuclear subs are steam engines , i am curious about what is fundamentally different from the point of veiw of the steam part (generating fresh water, and then condensing it for reuse). Since Titanic already had the tech to run an almost closed cycle freshwater from water to steam to water, I would assume they could do same on the K class boats?
    If so, wouldn't it be just a case of turning off the boilers, and running on leftover steam while you dive and eventually switching to electric?
    I am curious whether the concept itself was flawed, (since nucler subs reuse the concept today, is it flawed?), or whether the tech of the day just didn't allow scaling it down to fit a sub?
    If you turn off fuel flow to the boilers, wouldn't it very quickly stop generating smoke? Couldn't they have funneled all boiler smoke into a single "funnel" that went through the hull to the outside and thus, like for diesel subs, need to close off only one hatch for the smoke funnel?

    Reply
  3. I’m kinda shocked to hear you say diesels weren’t a known commodity by that point. What’s your take on the theory that the UK faked Rudolph Diesel’s death so he could defect and help them build submarines?

    Reply
  4. Well, Britain was ahead of its time using steam in its submarine vessels as we look at the submarines used by a number of countries now (We're behind in Canada still using Diesel due to some complaint years ago from the US regarding some US-British treaty and public backlash even though Canada is at the forefront of nuclear technology being the largest producer of radio-isotopes used in science and medicine and also being a country with virtually zero mishaps with the currently operating reactors) that use steam turbines driven by heat from nuclear fission. Then again, Canada promotes nuclear energy for peace and prosperity than for violence and as weapons. Ironically, that's how Rudolph Diesel wanted his engine to be used for peaceful purposes. The Germans kinda wrecked that image.

    Reply
  5. 1 minute 30 seonds in, Youtube runs a couple ads.

    All part of the wire's idea of how a phone call should work. Ninety seconds of "Hi, Mom!" and 60 seconds of "BUY Ol' Bens' FARINA !!" Then, carry on for another 60 seconds with Mom.

    Reply
  6. Diesels could be shut down with no CO2 fumes, only the stink of diesel fuel through the boat. There is no way to damp a coal fire quickly with the ability to relight it and get the steam turbine up to operational levels. The stem sub would consume the oxygen quickly and produce CO2 quickly a double whammy. A disaster easily seen by a child. Subs are not meant to be fast with the tech available at the day. Fast propellers produce cavitation. While anti submarine tech had not been developed to pick up the noise that cavitation produces there is no doubt that these fast subs were very noisy acoustically. and would have been easily located by passive sonars had they been developed at the time.

    Reply
  7. The silly mistake was that the boilers were high pressure, so neither they or the steam turbines needed to be inside the submarine. Being underwater wouldn’t bother them at all.

    Reply
  8. This was great, thank you! I’d like to see your thoughts and on Simon Lake submarines one day. Subs with wheels and intent for salvage. The story of the submarine sale and shipment to Russia and then transport by transiberian railroad is fascinating. His autobiography and lots newspaper articles and photos are online with some research. Holland vs. Lake – Lake is under appreciated.

    Reply
  9. Nuclear is steam. Nothing ridiculous about that.
    Sweden or Finland has a sub with a Sterling engine. Any insults you wish to hurl at that?
    I'm waiting to hear about your relevant military service that qualifies you to speak.

    Reply
  10. Ah yes, the "lawn darts of the sea," the ones that can reach crush depth while still on the surface with an incline of 15 degrees, Kudos to K-13 turned K-22, despite her best efforts, she was one of the last ones afloat, managing to get herself scrapped after a relatively long career (for a K-class).

    Reply
  11. If you continue with videos like these you will have to change the name off the channel. these aren't ocean liners.
    The "curse" was bad design. They should have known better. There were people that realised the problems.

    Reply
  12. Another amazing episode from one of my favourite channels. Thanks Mike, totally absorbing content delivered in a gimmick free style. This story is interesting from a technological stand point but is also an incredible story of human endeavour. Those sub-mariners are truly heroes and I cannot imagine what it must have been like to be a crew member of one those death traps.

    Reply
  13. I think it is like any new or emerging technology
    Your ideals cannot be met by present technology
    Evs are in the situation right now
    We want something new and better but unfortunately present technology is just not there yet
    I feel for all those early submariners who died because of technology short falls

    Reply
  14. I like how the info about the sub steam turbines fueled by fuel oil is accompanied by video of an airplane instrument board showing 5000 RPM, banking slightly left at altitude of 750 feet 😀

    Reply

Leave a Comment