NASA Reveals Plans to Find Life On Mars using a fleet of Ingenuity drones and more Space News!
Last Video: How NASA Plans To 3D Print A Mars Colony!
https://youtu.be/wj9KFpitdTw
SpaceX News and Updates: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBfN0491sF0QGbrNimSIWKYeyQ7JjENhE
Mars Colonization News and Updates
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBfN0491sF0SQRy0-pZBjdnBaU6JsWr4B
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans’ mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race… you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: https://www.theteslaspace.com
Business Email: [email protected]
#Spacex #Space #Mars
source
MEANWHILE A FLYING WHITE PROPANE TANK IS FLYING AROUND at MACH 10 UNIMPEDED AROUND THE US NAVY……While NASA is still looking for life on Mars! SMH, what a idiotic agency and the people that support it! SHOULDNT WE FIND OUT WHOS FLYING MACH 10 PROPANE TANKS FIRST before sending helicopters to Mars? lolz
That probably won't be us in the USA because Biden has given everything over to China and they'll probably take over the moon in the rest
they have developed a new way of drilling using fusion technology to melt and vaporize the rock, miniaturizing one and putting it on mars to drill in deep could be a viable option
Make a big one to retrieve everything.
Your outro speech is still cut off bud! Great vid as always.
Stop destroying the planet 🌏
STOP FRACKING ‼️
Stop to destroy the world with fracking ✋ 🛑
Only one people
Only one world
Stop fracking ✋
Great content.
good video. easily watchable at 1.5x speed.
I am probably in the minority hoping that they do not find life on Mars. If they do find something it will most likely be some uninteresting microbes. If they do then there will probably be a focus on preserving them. In my opinion this will get in the way of what we really need to be doing and that is colonising Mars, finding water sources to sustain life.
There are pyramids on Mars and this is why they are going. It's an archaeological Mission searching for The Rare Element 115 SpaceTime bending magic rock at the heart of interstellar alien propulsion systems. Faster than light speed travel is possible. CERN is trying to reverse engineer the alien technology already found on Earth. The boring machines electric cars robots and starlink satellites all fit into Starship.. they're not going to make a colony it's an archaeological mission the Chinese are already there because it is a race to find the Holy Grail. Element 115 will give us the power over space-time itself open the doors to the universe for exploration and give us the power to become gods. Just like the ones that created us millions of years ago. The Annunaki.. and now you know… The rest of the story
Try a propeller powered balloon next. With propane. Or whatever gas would lift it.
When is the next manned mission going to the moon?
Some one please let me know where he gives us the real reason for 100’s of drones as stated in the title.
Whenever I hear about destroying asteroids, I can’t help but hear Aerosmith in the background. “I dnt wanna close my eyes…”
Are The Klingon in Mars ??
I hate to burst everyone's bubble, but those rovers are NOT on Mars. I ran video footage from the rover through a software program that finds edits and alterations in the file and found in the background 3 or 4 trucks and a jeep. After running a color scan, the red hue was added as well. NASA is deceiving everyone…..there are 2-3 dry rock valleys in Antarctica with red soil that ive been told have been used to fake quit a bit of footage
In the series 'Mas' they use a series of drones to scout and provide aerial data for Martian astronauts.
What space race..?! we are already there ..wake up people
Anyone who is not investing now is missing a tremendous opportunity.
NASA found life in the 1970s. Says re-checking of their results. But NASA is afraid to disappoint, so stays quiet. – We need NASA and SpaceX success! Chinese already have a powerful heavy-lifter. And we beg European and Russian rockets, stronger than ours. We built the strongest, F-1 to the moon. Then forgot it, only use smaller rockets after. Why? Why wait 15 years for Shuttle, 3/4th the size of Apollo but only lifts 1/6th the weight and only 250 miles, not the 250,000 miles of Apollo! Where is the strongest F-1? Apollo, lifted 6 times the weight, 250,000 miles! Fastest, farthest of any rocket EVER! Both Shuttle explosions, 14 people dead from external fuel tanks and solid fuel boosters would have been prevented using the Apollo F-1s to lift the Shuttle! Why did we silently retire the Apollo Saturn 5, 3-man F-1, strongest rocket ever built, after complete success of moon landings? We beg Russia for their less powerful rockets. No F-1 failures, 65 times proved, 13 flights. 100% successful, most weight lifted, most distance, 250,000 miles. All other rockets lift less and mostly to 250 miles. The F-1 was promised to take us to Mars by 1985. It was quietly retired, even the blueprints lost. After complete success and reliability to the moon! For 60 years, we use old Mercury (1-man) and Gemini (2-man) Titan and Atlas rockets, upgraded. The 1950s Apollo upper stage J-2 is the Centaur. And we beg the Russians for their old 1950s rockets stronger than the Gemini, but weaker than the Apollo F-1 that took us to the moon. All other 1960s rockets are still used in America and Russia. Strong Apollo F-1 forgotten! Why? We put a lot of mass into space. We need every good rocket we have. And the F-1 was our BEST! After silent 15 years wait replaced by the Shuttle. A weak hydrogen burning rocket with solid rocket boosters (SRBs). Half a generation wait. Why? We had fully developed in 7 years, the 100% reliable, proved, most powerful F-1 that could have lifted SIX TIMES the weight. The Shuttle, 75% the weight of Apollo, but could only lift 1/6th the weight and up only 250 miles (at 3 times the cost per launch). All F-1 blueprints are missing. Gone! I've worked a government office. They keep everything! In 5 copies! The 5th, last goes to a special place; it can NEVER be lost! F-1 rocket, strongest, telling the world our nuclear missiles stronger than the Russians. F-1 forgotten, blueprints gone! If an alien UFO landed we would take it apart and reverse engineer it. Why 60 years, we have not reverse engineered the perfect record, strongest ever F-1s still in museums? They are easily X-rayed and copied and are mostly plumbing. No. We beg Russians for their weaker than the F-1 rockets! Gus Grissom, 2 weeks before he died in Apollo 1 fire said the Lunar LEM was unsafe. "Staples and taped aluminum foil." NASA officially says the LEM was 3 sheets of kitchen aluminum foil thick. 12/1000th of an inch. Yet a 10,000 lb rocket did not tear it to pieces. Look closely at official hi-def pics of the LEM sitting on the moon. You can see admitted "Scotch tape" holding on external panels. NASA admits using Scotch tape! It saved weight. Temperatures of 250 heat on the moon, but Scotch taped. (Odysee com search Lunar lander or American Moon). Was the Apollo Lunar lander on the moon a time machine!? Some audio questions were answered in 0.9 of a second in official NASA tapes. That is 3 times the speed of light. 2.7 seconds to-from the moon is required (without time-travel). Some NASA questions were answered by moon astronauts 0.9, 1.0 and 1.1 seconds between question and answer. In official NASA tapes. Every country was given a moon rock. The Netherlands tested theirs, it was petrified wood. From earth. Von Braun, NAZI head of moon mission would leave at busiest times to collect meteorites in the Antarctic. Antarctica was once a forest, petrified wood "rocks" are found there to this day along with meteorites, visible in the white snow. The original tapes from the moon landings are gone! We keep the original Constitution and a bell that cracked in 1776 Philadelphia, but not record of America and human's historic first trip to the moon! Nor blueprints to the strongest rocket ever built. James Webb, the head of NASA resigned DAYS before the 1st mission to the moon. Why? Neil Armstrong resigned and was silent all his life. Why? He was shy? Who cares, that was his job! To be the triumphant first on the moon, voice of all of us. Armstrong fully trained, successful on the moon, why not go on another mission? No. Retired! His anniversary words, "Much that is left undone", "protected by truth's protective layers." Who talks that way? He's admitting they lied! He avoided all anniversary's after! Human eyes see flashes in space. Film does not work beyond earth orbit. Both eyes and film see spots and cloudy patches from X-rays, Cosmic rays and the massive radiation of the Van Allen belts. There was NO thick lead around the moon camera. Nor lead lens! Nor around the film, going through the Van Allen belts twice! The film from the moon is perfect, no spots! As though made in Hollywood. The camera on the moon was thin aluminum. No insulation! Aluminum near INSTANTLY transfers heat or cold! It had no electric heater. -250 temperatures would have cracked and broken the plastic film as it moved through the camera. If it could move in a frozen camera. In sunlight, +250 temperatures would have melted the plastic film inside. The LEM has bright red hypergolic fire and smoke. The same SpaceX uses and Soviet thrusters maneuvering toward the Space Station. Always the flames are visible! You've seen them. Also look at the test films showing massive billowing dark red clouds from it. But on rise from the moon, the video shows no exhaust fire or smoke, not deep red, none. And no LEM thrusters fire as it rotates and aligns to join with the command module above the moon. You must have thruster fire right when the LEM moves left, but none! LEM landing pads in pictures on the moon have no dust in them. There are not even scorch marks under any LEM in moon pics. No craters either. The massive 10,000 lb rocket exhaust would have thrown dust into the pads. And at least left fire scorch marks under it. The LEMs were noisy. The engine more powerful than a jet, inside the LEM with the 2 astronauts. Engine and astronauts separated by thin sheets of aluminum foil. NASA says it was so thin, "You could put your fingers through it." That engine roars and massively vibrates! They couldn't even hear themselves. Yet you never hear anything in their calm, quiet words "from the moon." 1969 was the PEAK sun activity of that 11 year cycle, that could kill people in space. The WORST time to send astronauts! (Protected by 3 sheets of aluminum foil). And one Apollo, the landing site was in the dark when they were scheduled to land. You can check the charts. The LEM cannot land in the dark! And their rules forbade it! Because it would crash in the dark, on rocks or into holes! NASA always checked these details and timed launches to be exactly correct for a landing in the light. Fra Mauro, the landing site was completely in the dark at the scheduled landing time of Apollo 13! They knew they could not land! Before the launch! The sun/moon charts don't lie! Check them. Apollo 13 was totally faked! Another moon trip, video inside Apollo, when supposedly near the moon showed a full big blue earth through the window. That video is labeled by NASA, "Not for Public Showing." But was released. No Apollo moon mission ever left earth orbit! Grandpa lied! Nixon. Nazi Von Braun. 1960s American government. Vietnam. JFK killed by a magic bullet. The moon landings. CIA bs around the world. And more! Youtube hides it, but O d y s e e. com shows much evidence. Search Lunar lander. Or, 'American Moon (English)'. And while we SIT, Communist Chinese with Russians may be the TRUE first human beings to walk on the moon.
Lol, they are NOT looking for life on Mars. Lol.
Anybody know about the tic toc ufo?
If that is real, is it worth using time and money on new drones to try to find life? Should they use money on something else to get more technologi?
Obviously it is for the Amazon deliveries after Elon builds a colony there.
Get Musk to do it. Will be better, cheaper and do more
Why can't they just put a small propeller above the solar panel to blow dust off as needed?
But not only could the Chinese use this to destroy asteroids , but it could also be used against American spaceships returning to Earth from deep space.
And that is the REAL reason behind this test .
To control travel in the Solar System to just China .
DML
They should start with Aerostats (Mini-Blimps and Balloons). The raise into the atmosphere when the Sun is up, and land on the regolith when the Sun goes down. Just cameras, probe arms and detectors, with telemetry uplinks to satellites. Super cheap – so much so that 20,000 of them could be in place with just one mission to Mars. Gyro-copters are very expensive, complex.
Why can't those core samples just be stored in the explorer until the retrieval vehicle comes? Wouldn't that make it a lot easier to find the samples? They would be much less likely to be buried in a dust storm or damaged by a meteor near miss. I've never heard the logic behind doing it this way, dropping them in random places to be picked up in several or many years. They are tiny and the rover is the size of a VW!
If the rover can turn over a rock, that might help to find protected amino acids. A recent meteor crater or rock slide would be other places. I wonder if NASA plan to do that?
What’s the fake reason?
For them to use helicopter drones would mean that there is air and a sufficient atmosphere.
Which there is.
So what does that tell you
Nice Armageddon reference
Experiments on heat/cold waves, quake, flooding,,,,,,,to destroy E-signal,,,,,,,,
E-signal terrorists countries like India, China, Korea, Japan, Middle East etc must be destroyed.
These planets their lying about don't exist,the planets they say that's out there are the name of FALLEN Angels WAKE UP PPL THEY LIED GOD ONLY MADE THE HEAVENS AND EARTH NO PLANETS
That's great and all, but we have to start looking at other ways to detect other forms of life in the universe.
Yay, lets put more billions in exploration on a dead rock while we hardly spend anything to safe our own planet.
Does NASA and the US government tell us everything they find? If they have already found complex life on a celestial body, would they tell us?
I do not care what no one says. Space X is not telling the truth. It clearly shows a brief STATIC FIRE. IN SLOW MOTION YOU CAN SEE ALL 33. RAN HOT B4 THE EXPLOSION. Venting 33 engines created a cloud that lit up when the engines lit up. They snuck in a static fire.
I don't think we should bring any soil from Mars to Earth just yet. We don't know enough. After we have humans on the surface and have completed some solid examinations of martian soil and atmosphere. There is still too many unknown possibilities given the fact this is another planet that may have had life forms for which we have no knowledge of. Who knows what kind of virus could exist on another planet ? No one , we haven't done this yet.
If they could develop a kinetic penetrator Something that takes a core sample as it penetrates With Leaver bars at the end of the shaft t That would effectively use the impact to then recoil eject an in capsulated sample core Maybe with something so it can be tracked And then retrieved by the helicopter There's not much in the atmosphere for it to burn up on Reentry It would be an easy way to collect a lot of samples , Depending on how you design the penetrators You should be able to go down to depths as much as 40 feet Assuming you don't hit any rock
China can't be trusted in space they can't be trusted on the ground they can stay out of space backstabbers
Elon's Teslabots will be the first denizens of Mars. It'll be up to them to establish the underground colonies in advance of a human voyage there.
the martians are like; I saw a ufo…i swear!
THERE IS NO ATMOSPHERE…MARS IS IN A VACUUM…THERE IS NO DIFFERENTIAL IN PRESSURE…THIS IS A LIE…
If one can go with what you said as far as schedule, then we're not going to Mars in this decade.
Why do they vent it ? I mean isn't that wasteful and expensive over time why not put a vacuum chamber around the circumference of the base an pump the vented gas to a container of some sort i am not an engineer so this is probably a stupid question..
Nasa's BS continues. It is jsut shameful, Nasa.