Bishop Robert Barron, William Lane Craig, and Ben Shapiro have all used the same argument in defense of their god’s moral nature, but the argument is versatile enough to defend any characteristic of god. If the Teleological argument (argument from design) is the best argument for god, this is the best argument *in defense* of god. It may be overpowered, but does it have a weakness?
Videos of mine mentioned here:
I paid for Ben Shapiro’s video about atheism and all I got was disappointment
https://youtu.be/aZjnS1mp88E
Arguments for God’s Existence Tier List
https://youtu.be/cpC8WtufJbo
An Ex-Christian Q&A (Inside the Ark Encounter)
https://youtu.be/q4SaMJdfE8Y
——————————————-SUPPORT——————————————-
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/GeneticallyModifiedSkeptic
PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/GMSkeptic
——————————————-FOLLOW——————————————-
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gm_skeptic
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GMSkeptic/
————————-Resources for atheists in need————————-
Find a Secular Therapist: https://www.seculartherapy.org
Recovering from Religion helps connect those who are leaving or have left their religion with support, resources and community: https://www.recoveringfromreligion.org/#rfr-welcome
Resources for Ex-Mu’s: https://exmuslims.org/join-us/
This video contains 100% therapeutic grade skepticism.*
*This statement has not been evaluated by the FDA
source