The Most Insanely Armed Incredibly Smoking Aircraft Carrier



In the 1980s, the proud Soviet Navy built a less-than-satisfactory vessel that would become the symbol of the decaying regime. But when the USSR fell apart and Ukraine asserted its independence, the newly-formed state decided to keep it.

Admiral Kuznetsov was not as much an aircraft carrier as a heavy aircraft-carrying cruiser. From her inception, she was designed to support submarines and aircraft that carried missiles, as well as surface ships.

However, her development was hindered by the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and she was even forced to sail for thousands of miles without being finished.

After the fallout, the Soviets did not have the means to keep the flagship in optimal conditions, but the crumbling government would not let go of their crown jewel so easily, and secretly plotted to retrieve her from the Ukraniansโ€ฆ

source

37 thoughts on “The Most Insanely Armed Incredibly Smoking Aircraft Carrier”

  1. That's a nice pretend aircraft carrier you got there. It's be a shame if a missile were to hit it and it sank. Better play it safe and keep it in port. Don't you think?

    Reply
  2. โ€œShe was even forced to sail thousands of miles without being finishedโ€. Yeah that is called an act of piracy and international theft. Russia stole the Carrier from Ukraine. If you want an idea as to how far back the strains in the relationship were showing.

    Reply
  3. They intend to use it for another 10-15 years but like the rest of its life time it will be plagued with malfunctions and problems likely spending half of it in repair and refit and the other portion escorted by the mighty and fear inducing tugboat.

    Reply
  4. i see a lot of people already pointed out some important omitted facts and corrections. so all i'll say is that your russian pronunciation at 5:08 gave me cancer. in the future, just don't bother. say english/latin version of whatever you're talking about.

    Reply
  5. What a donkey.
    Imagine owning a aircraft carrier that was so functionally useless, and crushingly expensive to operate, that it actually REDUCES your armed forces ability to defend themselves.
    Seriously think about that. In a war the enemy would be better off NOT destroying it if they wanted to harm the Russian war effort.
    That is failure on a spectacular level.

    Reply
  6. I really think Russia should start work on a second carrier. With the US terrorist state and its NATO lapdogs destabilising the world, we need a stronger Russia.

    Reply
  7. It's not really a pure aircraft carrier. After the refit it will have a large missile inventory. Probably won't smoke as i understand it will have new engines.

    Reply
  8. She shares similarities with the incomplete German aircraft carrier Graf Zeppelin from ww2, which they refloated, inspected, and then sunk. Both were aircraft carriers combined with cruiser armor and weapons, and both nations by themselves could not care for the ship they were building or built.

    Reply
  9. Hell, just like the Soviets, the Russian government today doesn't even have the means to keep this ship in a working condition. It's amazing how far the Russian military ended up failing while under Putin. But hey, yachts win wars.

    Reply

Leave a Comment