The Long Island Serial Killer: Anthony's Connection to the Case



The Long Island Serial Killer

Imagine finding a duffel bag filled with drugs, sex toys, horrific porn, and a blank DVD showing a potential murder. This shocking discovery leads to an extraordinary tale of corruption and illegal detainment involving a troubled youth and a corrupt cop. Join us as we unravel this gripping story and the fierce battle for justice that ensued.

From lighthearted debates about the communication styles of boys and girls to humorous personal anecdotes, our latest episode has something for everyone. We share the exciting news about our upcoming live show at Catholic Palooza in New Jersey and the launch of our new merchandise store. The journey continues with a hilarious recounting of a minor head injury and the dramatic reactions it sparked, offering listeners plenty of laughs along the way.

Our conversation takes a deeper turn as we explore moral desensitization, addiction, and the struggles of those in positions of authority. We discuss the intersection of the spiritual and physical realms, touching on angels, hell, and resurrection. Reflecting on modern skepticism and historical spiritual experiences, we also address contemporary issues like social media addiction and its consequences. With powerful testimonies and thought-provoking discussions, this episode promises an engaging exploration of faith, morality, and the human experience.

********************************************************

https://www.avoidingbabylon.com

Merchandise: https://avoiding-babylon.creator-spring.com/

Locals Community: https://avoidingbabylon.locals.com

RSS Feed for Podcast Apps: https://feeds.buzzsprout.com/1987412.rss

SpiritusTV: https://spiritustv.com/@avoidingbabylon

Odysee: https://odysee.com/@AvoidingBabylon

source

26 thoughts on “The Long Island Serial Killer: Anthony's Connection to the Case”

  1. Yeah my brother was in an elavtor with joel rifkin a few times . Rifkin was visiting relatives .The nephew of Rifkin in that building while in the elavator with my brother told him that Rifkin just got arrested . Creepy world .

    Reply
  2. What does anyone think of the theory that the bodies were dropped out of a helicopter? Some of them were in very inaccessible places from the road. Maybe they hired some guy who flew rich guys from the city out to the Hamptons on the weekends. That’s what my BIL thinks.

    Reply
  3. Funny. I hardly talk at all, but my hubby can be a total motor-mouth! I asked his mom once if he talked much as a kid? She howled, and said they could never get him to shut UP! 😅 He's still at it at age 68, but I love 'im. 😊💕

    Reply
  4. BTK killed my friend, Nancy Fox. By then, I was working for the PD, and … it was really hard, especially when one of the Detectives had me pull the files and photos. He asked me to find the photos of the latest victim. Unfortunately, I came across Nancy's, first. 😭 Some lout had put them in the wrong envelope. 😠
    He seemed to have no particular "type" of victim, although he preferred females as they couldn't fight back so easily.

    Yes, he was married, with TWO kids: son and daughter.

    Reply
  5. 9:11 as a fellow member of the “Italian wives” club I totally sympathize with Anthony’s wife. Total solidarity.
    Italian men keep their guardian angels really busy. Everyone knows this.

    Reply
  6. About the whole “Eucharistic abuse” thing – clearly, horrific silliness was unleashed through the new mass. No disagreement there. If the Latin Church returned to the TLM that would be ideal. I attend the TLM. But I will say, in all my life attending the NO I’ve been fortunate enough to never witness a host falling to the ground. I’m puzzled ??? Like Nick, I too live in central Texas so I’m not sure if I’m just lucky but yeah… little weird to say you’ve seen the consecrated host fall to the ground more than 3 times during a NO Mass. that seems ridiculous.

    And even so, another point we fail to consider is that as much as our Lord does not approve of unworthy reception or desecration of the Eucharist, he is not “pained” by it, at least not now in heaven (where he is presently located). I hear many trads saying this is somehow “physically” hurting Jesus when we “drop him”. This is just incorrect.

    Sure, it is possible that, with his divine foreknowledge, Jesus was aware of future unworthy receptions of the Eucharist, even as he walked this earth 2000 years ago, and that this was a cause of pain back then. But let’s look at it.

    First of all, Jesus retains his human nature in Heaven and will retain it for all eternity. (See CCC 659.) However, because he has ascended into Heaven (where he is LOCALLY present), he is now glorified and therefore impassible; that is, he can no longer suffer. (This is a property of all glorified bodies, including Christ’s; see Revelation 21:4.)

    Second, it should be noted that, although the presence of Jesus in the Eucharist is real and substantial (that is, the consecrated bread and wine are no longer actual bread or wine, but Jesus), it is a sacramental presence – different from a “local” presence. (See CCC 1353 and 1369.) One is not to imagine that our consumption of the sacred species causes harm to Jesus physical body that is in Heaven. In a similar way, it is not as though Jesus feels a physical discomfort or anything like that when someone receives him unworthily.

    It follows that no action on our own part can harm or otherwise grieve Jesus in the Eucharist… although, of course, deliberately receiving Christ unworthily or desecrating the Eucharist is extremely harmful for the person who does it. That’s the big concern! We have a reverential duty.

    Naturally, people are not responsible inadvertently stepping on small particles—provided it is truly inadvertent and not due to negligence or something like that. In that case, it does not even harm or affect the persons who do it, still less Jesus.

    And while Jesus is still fully present in the tiny broken fragments or visible pieces of crumbs, once the Eucharistic species suffer a change sufficiently great that they no longer have the properties of bread or wine, then the sacramental presence ceases. Christ is not sacramentally present in micro-particles of the host that are barely visible to the human eye.

    Hence, in essence, for the host, the Presence remains until it has been dissolved into a paste or divided into minuscule particles; for the wine, the Presence remains until it is diluted or divided into minuscule droplets.

    (That is why, for example, the priest, deacon, or acolyte uses water to purify the vessels after Communion: this action dissolves any remaining particles of the host and dilutes any remaining drops of the Precious Blood. Although minuscule particles of the Host technically do not retain the Presence, out of reverence for the Presence that was once there, care should be taken lest these fall to the floor. Thus, for example, any breaking of the host should always be done over the corporal—the white cloth on which the species are consecrated—and when Communion is given out, someone should generally hold a paten or other receptacle underneath to catch any falling hosts or particles.)

    It is hard to pinpoint the exact moment after receiving Communion that the Presence ceases, but it’s safe to say the Host remains Christ's body until it is broken down in our digestive systems.

    Reply
  7. Watching now and I too spend half my Sunday driving to Mass and back. It’s a diocesan Latin Mass at 2pm. I’d spend my whole Sunday if I had too obviously but I cannot have any other activity with family and friends and that’s hard for sure.

    Reply

Leave a Comment