The Fukushima Disaster: Japan’s Nuclear Nightmare | Free Documentary



The Fukushima Disaster: Japan’s Nuclear Nightmare | Free Documentary

Airpocalypse – Surviving the World’s Most Polluted City: https://youtu.be/f3y0hz_ahqY

There has been endless hand-wringing and finger-pointing following the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Disaster. But the full effects of the disaster are still shrouded in secrecy, and both TEPCO and the Japanese Government have limited any meaningful analysis of the disaster’s impact on health and the environment. Featuring interviews with scientists and whistle-blowers, this unwavering documentary reveals the political and financial interests at work behind the most severe nuclear accident since Chernobyl.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Subscribe Free Documentary Channel for free: https://bit.ly/2YJ4XzQ
Instagram: https://instagram.com/free.documentary/
Facebook: https://bit.ly/2QfRxbG
Twitter: https://bit.ly/2QlwRiI
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
#FreeDocumentary #Documentary #japan
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Free Documentary is dedicated to bringing high-class documentaries to you on YouTube for free with the latest camera equipment used by well-known filmmakers working for famous production studios. You will see fascinating shots from the deep seas and up in the air, capturing great stories and pictures of everything our extraordinary planet offers.

source

42 thoughts on “The Fukushima Disaster: Japan’s Nuclear Nightmare | Free Documentary”

  1. There has been endless hand-wringing and finger-pointing following the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Disaster. But the full effects of the disaster are still shrouded in secrecy, and both TEPCO and the Japanese Government have limited any meaningful analysis of the disaster's impact on health and the environment. Featuring interviews with scientists and whistle-blowers, this unwavering documentary reveals the political and financial interests at work behind the most severe nuclear accident since Chernobyl.

    Reply
  2. An incredibly insightful and powerful documentary. The Fukushima disaster serves as a sobering reminder of the immense power and risks associated with nuclear energy. This video does an excellent job of explaining the complexities of the situation, the human impact, and the ongoing challenges. Kudos to the team for shedding light on such an important topic!

    Reply
  3. I'll post the marine biologist channel if I can find it.. BUT this channel I used to follow had a marine biologist do underwater videos of B.C shoreline. Before Fuks.. It was so loaded with life you couldn't see the rock it was attached to. After Fuks, barren wasteland. Just stones and rocks and a white ooze.

    Gonna watch this one tonight.

    Reply
  4. 30:00 omg .. this woman was given waaay to much speak time about her idea of a Plastic, nuclear, green earth friendly way of life, etc… made me fall a sleep .. >.<

    Saying nuclear energy is the most unclean, expensive, etc energy form had me lol! …
    She is delulu

    Reply
  5. This is a s*****, liberal bias documentary. Watch this if you only want one, very opinionated point of view. The best documentary on Fukushima is the front line documentary. It's bias left too but not nearly as bad as this one.

    Reply
  6. Loved hearing from Maggie Gunderson. She made all good points. The news media is always being controlled unfortunately, even for those who work hard to find the truth & bring it to the people who deserve it!
    She is NOT delulu 👀 (I'm not sure daquarius1222 really knows what that means)

    Reply
  7. as chernobil survivor, stop all nuclear energy! people just should focus on stop wasting energy, 99% of energy in world is useless waste, no u dont need sofa, no u dont need constant hot showers, no u dont need go everywhere with a car. Much safer breeder reactors could be allowed but only for research and not as some industry…

    Reply
  8. I moved to Japan from the UK, and even considering natural disasters INCLUDING that which caused Fukushima meltdown, I still feel a hundred times safer here than I did there. The Japanese have done astonishing work cleaning up after Fukushima. For example, people and businesses are already moving back into what was the exclusion zone.. You cannot say the same thing about Chernobyl. Yes of course they (the Japanese) weren't prepared, but can anyone ever be truly prepared for waves of 40 meters high? No! It's not what happened that the Japanese should be judged by, it's what they did after the fact which counts. Humans will NEVER defeat mother nature, she is stronger and more powerful than we will ever be. We can only do our best. Fukushima was an accident, brought on by natural disaster. We humans have caused far more, worse things by our own choices and decisions!

    Reply
  9. AU, did you know?… The federal government had selected a site in South Australia's Eyre Peninsula to store low and intermediate level radioactive waste, In November 2021, Napandee near the town of Kimba, We here, in Australia should say NO to storing Nuke waste and NO to the nuke plants Aus govt and industry are trying to push to have Nuclear power plants here in Australia. Who wants to store this stuff and risk every 7 years having nuke fallout?? @45:19 +

    Reply
  10. ‘OPAL’ research reactor at Lucas Heights, approx. 25kms south of Sydney. The desire to continue to operate a reactor is driven by questionable foreign policy objectives.

    Since 2007, a saga has been unfolding regarding contamination accidents at the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), ANSTO’s handling of those incidents,

    28 August 2008 − Incident at ANSTO involving a vial of molybdenum-99. An audit found that proper processes were not followed: evacuation of the area did not occur, timely communication and event reporting, thorough investigation and follow-up did not occur.

    (source: This entry was posted in Nuclear Reactor or Former Proposed Reactor Site and tagged HIFAR, OPAL, Lucas Heights, nuclear research reactor, ANSTO on September 20, 2011 by jim. )

    Reply
  11. I have some mixed opinions about this documentary. I feel that after watching this, I'm moved emotionally, but it hasn't been educational.
    I was hoping for a deeper explanation as to the breakdown of the Fukushima power plant. But there are far too many opinions from too few people and it's very light on documented facts.

    Reply
  12. stop nuclear energy agenda masquerading as a documentary..shame on you! Simple fact of the matter is that solar and wind are not even a small drop in the ocean of the energy requirements for an exponentially rising demand. the affects from burning fossil fuels will be hundreds of millions times worse than any/all nuclear disasters past present and future. Fission will be required until the gap is bridged to fusion.

    Reply
  13. Why can't we create new technologies that can convert plutionium waste to something useful , this would remove the need for waste management. The other thing that can be managed is safety: How to build better nuclear power plants that are highly resistant to accidental meltdowns. These two would require more money for research.
    On a philosophical note, I think stopping something is same as supporting it. Anything that is not good fades away without any stop/support. For example, light bulbs faded away and LED bulbs took their place, not because of energy concerns (opposition), but because of creative newer alternatives.
    So in terms of thinking if nuclear energy is bad, scientists should get more funding and more time to research in tidal wave energy, ground movement energy, better materials for tapping more solar energy, tapping infrared/radio wavelengths energies (similarly, other newer forms of energies available). The same future approach of giving more money and time to nuclear fusion is already happening in France.
    On a lighter note. what's better to quinch thirst (concern, political will to change) aroused from chillis (man made disasters): water (prohibition), or sugar syrup (newer renewables or upgraded technology for nuclear fission and fusion) 😃

    Reply
  14. I can say nuclear creator are evil person.. i would say , why dont they rather help the poor people on earth instead of wasting billions of money on nuclear??? Without nuclear the world would be happy and better to live

    Reply
  15. Atomic power is the cheapest most safest power available to us. Watch the Illinios energry professor if you want to know. This documentary has so many falsities and scaremongering its not worth watching. Did you know nuclear power stations release less radiation than coal fired stations?

    Reply
  16. Well that was a bunch of fear mongering. If you want to fear it then stop building coal power plants that puts radioactive elements straight into the air or hell let's go a step further let's just stop eating bananas they have a radioactive element in them. I'm going to tell you right now we have a better chance of dieing to each other and our lack of compassion for one another then we do from any meltdown and if you don't believe look at all the wars that have happened. Fun fact radiation dose save lives. Ever been woken up by your fire alarm you can thank radiation for that

    Reply

Leave a Comment