The Exiled Windsors (2023) – FULL DOCUMENTARY – HD



The year; 1936. Behind the doors of 10 Downing street. Controversy. Suspicion. Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin has a difficult decision to make. The King of England, and of Great Britain, is infatuated with divorced American socialite Wallis Simpson. The King has been showering his mistress with extravagant gifts, a warning to the security services of possible blackmail. Fears grow, too, of his association with fascist sympathisers, and the possibility the king could attempt to overthrow the government to keep his seat of power on the throne. At the very least, would the affair trigger civil unrest and turmoil in an already unstable country. The Prime Minister must make that difficult decision. To spy on the head of state, the monarch, is an extraordinarily controversial and intrusive act, but Baldwin finally gives the order. The British intelligence service began to spy on the King. And so began one of the greatest constitutional crises in centuries… Edward and Wallis – The Exiled Windsors.

source

46 thoughts on “The Exiled Windsors (2023) – FULL DOCUMENTARY – HD”

  1. The fact is wallis Simpson was born with androgen-insensitivity syndrome, an intersex condition. Outwardly she appeared female but didn’t have a womb or cervix . Doctors do consider them female but she could not get pregnant and by her own admission never had sexual penetration ever in her life or let anyone touch her below her mason dixon line . Even Edward never had inter course with her. But she had spent a year in china and knew all sorts of oil message techniques for stimulation and oral sex .

    Reply
  2. Clearly, she was a clout chaser clawing her way up the ladder of society. Got to the top, couldn’t back down and what a miserable existence living with this no backbone jellyfish.

    Reply
  3. Again, what good are aided countries in preserving heritiage ,power and currency (they are no good) …In fact traders to greed and immortality that give way to no morals or noble acts…

    Reply
  4. Wallace loved him and he loved her. Not much else can be said about that. She wasnt a plant of any country. There was no conspiracy. After his death the royale family took care of her and she lived on royale grounds till her death and is buried on royale grounds next to her love so that fake narrative is debunked.

    Reply
  5. King Edward wins the trophy for being the most whipped man in modern history.
    By the time Edward hooked up with Wallace, she already bedded enough men to fill every room of the Monarcy huge residence.
    To give up the thrown over a piece of lady hood is ridiculous.
    Edward lived out his life being the DooBoy of Wallace.

    Reply
  6. There seems to be A LOT of rewriting history in this. Never saw anything anywhere about Wallis being this wonderful hard-working Woman. That said, Wallace Simpson does deserve a statue in London because she saved England from the horrors of having this insipid man as king. God knows what would've happened during World War II with him on the throne and his Nazi proclivities.

    Reply
  7. Imagine being the man formerly known as the King living out his life with his American lady as a footnote.
    Wallis must have been remarkable in the sack for Edward to allow himself to become her Do Boy.

    Reply
  8. This was never about love. After the abdication thet both should have realised they were private citizens with a good income who should have concentrated on their relationship and retired from public view. The face they fidnt shows quite the opposite… cake and eat it comes to mind.

    Reply
  9. thank you for sharing history. a private ois worth a thousand wards .
    many would have never understood.

    it is hard to deal with love anvd famliy and duty to the british empire called the.

    royal united

    kingdom. . history happened yet the books are not always fair.

    look at the mess with the heigr and a spare that qe2 had to deal with prinnse chrles and the messbwith lady diana spenser andb2 royal sons . thenb the messey divorce and the camilla gate mess. prince william found love a nd family. that knockrf the family of harry who renounsed his royal duties. prince george us the next in line agter prince william and prinvess charolrttr is thenext i n linebtonthe throne.

    qe2 stripped thebroyal duties from randy andy and turned over thehis duties to prinvess anne. qe2 loved abdy as a son and left him the royal duty of txaking care of her beloved corgies. i guess some one has ro be a royal pooper scooper. the prince of disgrace is stuck taking care of doggie crap. and the royal beat of the united kingdom bgoes on.

    Reply
  10. Oddly enough, to me, it seems like he really never expected to happen what happened. He expected he could resign and still call the shots. The fact that a tippy toed around the nazis is a prime example of that.

    Reply
  11. Listened to the whole thing. Interesting that there was not so much as a peep about the accusations of her role in communicating/interceding/supporting(?) with the German intelligence services. At least address the concerns.

    Reply
  12. I remember seeing them interviewed years ago. First of all it struck me that she did most of the talking, and he seemed very uneasy. He kept rolling his thumbs over each other. She was wearing thousands of dollars of clothes and jewelry. I do recall, especially as an American, that I was nonjudgmental, but I did find her to be a self indulgent, entitled individual by some of the responses she gave. As I mentioned, he spoke very little.

    Reply
  13. A Monarch has the duty of service toward their Kingdoms' subjects.
    A Prime Minister has the duty of service toward the Monarch and the Monarch's Kingdoms' subjects.

    David claimed that he "never wanted to withold anything"… but he did, again and again.
    All his married mistresses he witheld from the Kingdoms' subjects, except for Wallis.
    Can anyone truthfully say they trust a single word David ever said?
    Never EVER trust an overt/covert narcissist such as David.

    Reply
  14. Wow these commentators place interpretations on the actions of Churchill, Cosmo Lang and the newspapers that are not justified by the evidence. The surveillance was started by the king and was paid for by him. Baldwin continued it, but that was because he had legitimate reasons to be concerned. Maybe they were worried about comments about miners, but they were more worried about him not keeping his confidential papers secured and his firing people to pay for jewels for Wallis. It appears they did use Wallis to get rid of him, but they had good reasons to do so

    Reply
  15. His whole life Edward wanted status for Walace.
    So much for the 'great needful love of his life'being enough.
    The status for 'HER'
    besides being unrealistic in reality, makes one wonder why. Was it because he still imagined himself the very image of a king. As in noble Caesar is always and forever king below God only??
    Did it diminish him if she wasn't? Or was it a reaction to her pevish hold over him.
    Like, I will try to get you, HRH ,just get off my back, will you!

    Reply
  16. To be perfectly honest , I would not want to be associated with any of her siblings . Their children seem mercifully(on the whole), to have escaped their influence. Her parents, on the other hand are a different matter . Doria, has apart from one headline about Compton had a freee pass , guess why , female , black , single mother . The fact that Rachel's father raised her on his own , private education etc , orchestrated the only known feminist thing she can lay claim to , that his brother facillited her internship at an embassy . Well they are white / male . Its still astonishing to me that with all their secret jetting around the world , the D of S never wondered why Rachel could never find the time for him to meet the man who raised her on his own . But that would not have fitted with her narrative of a bi-racial woman , offspring of a black single mother , battling against racial prejudice in the US . Poor Rachel

    Reply

Leave a Comment